Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Modern people's views on the original photography studio
Modern people's views on the original photography studio
This kind of good/bad criticism is mostly impromptu, random and subjective, and often lacks theoretical depth and academic rigor. For example, if you think a text (whether written or visual) is "good/bad", this expression can hardly explain anything except your personal inclination, preference and attitude. Because you have not pointed out the theoretical basis of the "good/bad" standard, is this standard reliable, what is the deep relationship behind it as a product of "historicization", and which "ideologies" have been covered up? For example, the standard of "good" in "Jose" is very different from that in domestic film competitions. Why? Is it really as simple as you think? In addition, do you really understand the text (although all reading is misunderstood), do you go deep into the text, or are you just confused by its rhetorical appearance and act as an ideology (mainstream discourse ideology? Daily life ideology? "accomplice" Wait ... Although this kind of critical criticism also has its existence value (such as the demand of mass culture market), it is not the real theoretical criticism I am interested in. Although it is also helpful to photography, it is difficult to promote the renewal of photographic discourse-symbol system.
- Related articles
- The most effective way to deodorize squatting toilets.
- Bride makeup artist
- How about Qingdao Boiling Point Catering Management Co., Ltd.?
- What TV series do mothers like to watch?
- Small wedding scene layout
- Trunk+camping wind! After Sanse Road in Chengdu, another night market is on fire!
- What honor did Gao Yuan, a famous calligrapher, win?
- How to take a picture of my hand? Specifically, my camera is Panasonic GX- 1.
- The most famous tourist attractions in Yunnan are in that area.
- Self-taught photography course