Meng Jia's studio published a long apology in Weibo. How to evaluate the team's public relations on plagiarism?

Everyone must have seen Meng Jia naked on the cover of Meng Jia's new album, and then she made a cross sign on her chest. Then when she released the album, she also said that she was trying to break through herself, but netizens found that the cover of her album involved plagiarism, and later her studio apologized. I think her team's public relations about plagiarism is quite good this time, because the following comments are basically favorable.

One: too much plagiarism. The Public Relations Department pointed out that this had nothing to do with Meng Jia. Meng Jia's plagiarism is really serious this time, because others' plagiarism may be in the middle, or at the beginning and end, and it is impossible to copy them all. However, from the comparison of the pictures, Meng Jia copied the whole picture this time. Judging from the pose, her dress and hairstyle are exactly the same as those of the model. Who can not be angry when she looks at it? Not to mention the original author who took the photo, she was definitely more angry after reading it, so her studio immediately responded that it had nothing to do with Meng Jia, so please don't attack Meng Jia.

Two: plagiarism is the pot of the photography team. Meng Jia was kept in the dark. The studio said that this photo belongs to her team of photographers. She felt very good and took this photo with luck, but Meng Jia actually knew nothing about it, so please stop accusing her of plagiarism. In fact, she just thought she appreciated this photo, so she used it. She doesn't know where this photo came from, and she doesn't know that it already belongs to the owner. I think Weibo responded to plagiarism. Weibo's comment is basically good, because many people are saying, please protect Meng Jia and don't let her get hurt again, because this own goal really hurts her a lot.

Three: team public relations is very good. Compared with Zheng Shuang, I think this kind of public relations is quite good. The language is clear and others can understand what is expressed. Unlike Zheng Shuang's one response, she responded twice, and she really didn't know what she was responding to. This time, they did not respond to plagiarism lightly. After discovering plagiarism, they also responded positively and asked the photography team to communicate and apologize. I think this public relations is very good. I actively admit my mistake, then find out the cause of the mistake, then change the mistake and find the measures to make up for it. I think it's good. Unlike before Zheng Shuang, public relations was very unsatisfactory, just like reading comprehension, which was still unclear and boring.