My Nikon 18-5555-300, I want to give them a close-up, with a UV hood and four times green leaves. I mean, match them all.

If you choose 55-300 besides 18-55, I want to say that this is a good DX telephoto. If these two lenses want to be used for a long time, they should be matched with UV and hood.

UV mirror can eliminate ultraviolet rays, but it has little effect on the daily photography of digital cameras. More often, it is to protect the lens. Even so, if you choose a low-priced UV mirror, there will still be side effects: the ghost in the backlight is very serious, and the definition of the photo is reduced. Therefore, it is suggested that the minimum in ordinary UV should be high. It is suggested that MC should be coated with UV in multiple layers.

It is best to have a hood. The main function of the hood is to block the stray light around the lens, which is more obvious when the backlight or side backlight is used. The other is to protect the lens. Generally, a hood can block the lens. The original range hood is too expensive and cost-effective. You can choose a domestic range hood, which is cheap and affordable, and its functions are not diminished. Look at the buyer's comments when buying. There are differences in workmanship between domestic brands, and some brands may not be tight.

Green leaf +4 close-up mirror is a magnifying glass, but it is not expensive. The effect can only be said to meet the needs of the primary macro-curious crowd. It doesn't matter if it's inappropriate. Close-up can choose XPRO, the effect is very good, but the price is not low. Macro lenses are not used much. It is recommended to buy only large-caliber lenses. If the 55-300 is a 58mm filter, buy a 58mm close-up lens, and then buy a 52-58 adapter for the 18-55 lens. The adapter ring can also be used to connect filters such as CPL in the future, which is portable and economical.