Will Trump's travel ban really be frustrated again?

On Monday (September 1 1 local time), the U.S. department of justice filed an urgent application with the U.S. Supreme Court, aiming at blocking the ruling of the Court of Appeal. The ruling will curb President Donald Trump's intention to temporarily ban most refugees from entering the United States.

The Ministry of Justice did not ask the Supreme Court to immediately block the ruling made by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco on Thursday (7th).

On Thursday (7th) local time, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected Trump's travel ban, allowing grandparents of extended family refugees and other specific categories of refugees to enter the United States without being restricted by the travel ban.

The resolution, ruled by three judges of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, allows some refugees to enter the United States after signing commitment contracts with relevant institutions, and the resolution will take effect within five days. ?

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected Trump's "travel ban" issued in March, which banned travelers from Iran, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days. The same executive order includes a refugee ban of 120 days. ?

Both clauses were rejected by lower courts, but the Supreme Court partially restored them in June. According to local media reports such as The Wall Street Journal, the US Supreme Court ruled on June 26, allowing Trump's government to partially take effect of the travel ban issued in March this year for six countries with a majority Muslim population, which changed the previous decision of the lower courts to suspend the implementation of the "travel ban". The media generally believe that this is a major victory won by Trump. ?

On June+10, 65438, the Supreme Court will rule on a broader issue, that is, whether the travel ban violates the US Constitution because it contains discrimination against Muslims. ?

According to earlier reports, the Trump administration of the United States issued a travel ban in March this year to suspend the entry of citizens from six countries, including Iran. After the ban was partially implemented at the end of June this year, it is still controversial. One of the focuses of controversy is the definition of "close relatives" who can enter the United States. ?

On the 7th local time, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that it did not recognize the explanation that the government banned grandparents and grandchildren from the category of "close family members". ?

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that in the travel ban, grandparents, grandchildren, grandchildren and cousins of American residents in six restricted countries should all belong to "close relatives" to avoid being restricted from entering the United States in the ban. It is unreasonable for the Trump administration to exclude these relatives from the scope of "close relatives", but it cannot give a convincing explanation. ?

Earlier, the State Council said that among the citizens of the six countries restricted by the travel ban, anyone who has a "close family" relationship with American citizens will not be restricted by the travel ban, including parents, spouses, children, brothers and sisters. However, grandparents and grandchildren are regarded as distant relatives and are restricted by the ban. ?

In July this year, Hawaiian federal judge Derek Watson ruled to expand the scope of "close relatives" in the "travel ban" on the grounds of "basic common sense". The ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit made Trump's travel ban frustrated again.