Three couples had sex with each other while traveling, but they still pleaded not guilty after being sentenced. How to interpret this sentence?

Three couples had intimate relations while traveling, but they still refused to plead guilty after being sentenced, which is jaw-dropping! These three couples were suspected of gathering people for sexual immorality, and the court ruled that there was nothing inappropriate in accordance with the law! For this reason, it is reasonable, reasonable and legal for these three couples to be sentenced to one year in prison each! Three couples were suspected of gathering a crowd for obscenity, and the court's sentence was reasonable and legal

After the first instance verdict was announced, these three couples actually mentioned that they wanted to appeal in court, which was shocking. They did such ridiculous things. They trampled morality and law under their feet. After the verdict was announced in the first instance, they did not plead guilty, thinking that they did not belong to the group of people who gathered for lewdness and that they had the right to control their own bodies. It was deeply regrettable!

After this incident was posted on the Internet, netizens expressed their disbelief. After all, it was something immoral and against public order, good customs and the law! After the first-instance verdict, the three couples still shamelessly believed that they were right. Their views were incorrect and shocking! This case will definitely go to the second trial. I hope the second trial will uphold the original verdict and allow these three couples to serve time in prison and reflect on their sins! I hope that after they receive education, they can understand how disgusting and destructive what they did is! Article 301 of my country's "Criminal Law" stipulates that "anyone who openly floutes national laws and social ethics, gathers many men and women to engage in lewd acts collectively shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years, criminal detention or surveillance." That is to say, as long as three or more people are involved. In sexual relationships, regardless of whether the participants are voluntary or not, and whether it is conducted in public or not, they will be treated as the crime of gathering a crowd for lewdness.

Treating marriage as child's play goes against public order and good customs, and has a huge impact on many people's values. This is also a wake-up call for many people. In many cases, the bottom line of morality is the bottom line of the law. Never do things that violate public ethics just because of temporary excitement. Two people in a marriage should pay enough attention to the marriage. Even if the relationship fades, if they want to find excitement, they should not use such methods to have an impact on the marriage. Their behavior violated marital fidelity. Not only that, this behavior has a great negative impact. If this behavior is not stopped, it may have a very bad social influence, not only destroying many people's beautiful imagination of marriage, but also destroying the stability of the family.