For travel photography, is it worth choosing the 70-200f4?

For travel photography, is it worth choosing the 70-200f4?

This configuration is not suitable: the 70-200 lens is a telephoto zoom lens. Its main advantage is in portrait photography, and daily travel photography is mostly landscape or environmental portrait photography. More lenses require wide focal length, which means a wider field of view. What's more, 70-200 is not lightweight!

70-200 is a long focal length, which is more suitable for taking photos with shallow depth of field and small angle of view, and is more suitable for portrait shooting.

It is also very capable for some distant scenery photos. These are the advantages of telephoto lenses.

But for scenes with a larger field of view, 70-200 is powerless, not to mention that in travel photography, scenes with a wide angle of view are more often shot.

If the space is wide, the 70-200 can completely solve the problem by increasing the shooting distance, but in some restricted spaces, the 70-200 is basically impossible to shoot.

For travel photography, a "neither long nor short" lens like the 24-70 may be more suitable. It has both wide and telephoto lenses, although it is "black" as "neither long nor short". ”, but after all, this is a travel shoot, so the focal length arrangement is very suitable.

The above personal suggestions are for reference only.

I am the South of the South, welcome to follow me.

For travel photography, is it worth choosing the 70-200f4?

It is safe to say that your choice is no problem.

First of all, if you mainly focus on traveling and shooting scenery, choosing 70-200/4 is a good decision.

This lens is one of the small ternary lenses. Although it does not have a large aperture of 2.8, it is no problem at all when shooting scenery, and it can be taken well. The biggest feature is that this lens is relatively lightweight and suitable for carrying around. Shooting and holding for a long time are not too burdensome.

As for imaging, you can rest assured that the image quality is very good, and the imaging is good at all focal lengths. Compared with large ternary lenses, the price of this lens is several thousand yuan cheaper. Of course, it is also feasible to use it to shoot portraits. Although it is not as good as the bokeh of 2.8 aperture, it still has a good soft effect.

Whether it is Nikon or Canon, the sharpness of this focal length lens is still quite good, and the anti-shake is also very powerful. Especially when you are traveling, sometimes it is not convenient to bring a tripod, so choose a lighter and anti-shake lens. A powerful lens is suitable.

Overall, this little three-dimensional lens is very good, a good lens for travel photography.

The above is my opinion. Friends are welcome to add or comment.

Sword Dance Image, western photography enthusiasts, welcome to follow

Is it worth choosing 70-200f4 for travel photography?

For travel photography, it is good to buy the latest mid-range original 70-300mm telephoto lens

Hello, let me share my opinion And suggestions:

1. 70-200mmF4.0 is basically a lens that has been eliminated by the times

1. If you are a professional photographer, you still need 70-200mmF2.8. F2.8 cannot be replaced.

2. If you are an amateur photographer, then the new 70-300mm has good image quality, is not bulky, and is not expensive.

3. If you are a landscape photography enthusiast, then 100-400mm or 80-400mm is a better choice.

4. The 70-200mmF4.0 does not have much background blurring capability. The background blurring capability is almost the same as that of the 70-300mm.

5. The image quality of 70-200mmF4.0 is actually similar to the latest mid-range price 70-300mm from the original factory. Although there are differences, they can be regarded as the same thing. .

In short, no matter from any aspect, it is not recommended to buy the 70-200mmF4.0 lens.

2. In fact, more strictly speaking, for travel photography, a telephoto lens is not strictly necessary.

Except for some scenery in western China, if you don’t have a telephoto lens, you will feel pity.

In fact, even if you don’t have a telephoto lens and can’t photograph most of the scenery, it wouldn’t be a pity.

3. Strictly speaking, if you are not a person who is demanding about image quality, nor is it a high-pixel body

To put it bluntly, if you are demanding about the image quality of the lens, why bother? Woolen cloth?

If you really have the money, time, and fame to do a full-length drama, you will definitely want to do a full-length drama.

If you can’t do a full set of plays, you might as well use an APS body.

For example, a Fuji XT30 paired with a Fuji 18-135mm is sufficient for travel photography, and the image quality is actually good enough.

To sum up, it is a very important spirit and concept to do a full set of dramas. If you cannot do a full set of dramas, then you should streamline your ideas and pursuits and make them consistent with your own reality.

I am currently using a 70-200f4 Canon lens, commonly known as: Xiaobai. The reason why I bought it was because of its lightness. After using it for several years, I have the following thoughts:

1. Lightness. As the number of trips increases, I feel more and more that the lightweight of equipment is really important. Otherwise, why are micro-singles becoming more and more popular?

2. The image quality is average, because its maximum constant aperture is only f4, and the background blur effect when taking portraits is not as good as f2.8, but the price and weight have also come down, so it is definitely not suitable for travel photography. questionable.

3. This lens still has batch-to-batch quality differences, so be careful when purchasing.

When traveling with a 70-200F4 lens, it’s not about whether it’s worth it, but whether it’s enough.

When traveling, a 70-200 F4 small ternary lens is definitely much lighter than a large F2.8 ternary lens. The F2.8 is indeed a bit too big and heavy. When traveling with this lens, no matter whether you want to climb mountains or not, and carry it for a day, the first thing you should do when you return to the hotel at night is to wash up and go to sleep. It would be much better to bring F4, after all, F4 is much smaller and lighter. There is not much difference in image quality between the 70-200 F4 and F2.8 lenses. With the big three yuan, the reason why we also produce the small three yuan is because the small three yuan is easy to push and bring, and there is no distinction between them in terms of picture quality.

However, when traveling, you will encounter a variety of scenes and scenery. Carrying only one 70-200 may be too limiting. Faced with some large scenes and rural customs that require a wide-angle lens, only one 70-200 cannot handle them all.

When traveling, the first thing to consider is to bring a wide-angle zoom to medium focal length lens, such as: 24-70, 24-105, 28-135, etc. I think the 24-105 is the most suitable lens for travel. , if there are not too many distant views to be photographed, bring a 24-105, which can handle most scenes, and will definitely make your trip without regrets. The 24-105 is Canon's classic wide-angle zoom medium focal length lens. It has good image quality, is small in size, and is light in weight. It can handle shooting in most scenes and should be your first choice when traveling.

The 70-200 is an auxiliary lens in photography. When we need to shoot some distant scenes that are inaccessible, we can use the telephoto lens. But when traveling, most of the scenes should be in front of you. There are many shots that need to be shot with wide angle and medium focus. After all, there are only a few distant views shot with telephoto lens. Therefore, the telephoto lens can only be used as a backup lens, and a wide-angle zoom to medium focal length lens is the main camera lens and should be considered first when traveling.

Summary

When traveling, bring a 70-200F4 lens, which is definitely better than an F2.8 lens because it is easy to carry and the image quality is also very good. But if you only bring this one lens, it may not be completely sufficient. You have to consider adding a wide-angle zoom to a medium-focus lens, so that your travel photography can finally be complete.

For travel photography, is it worth choosing the 70-200f4? I used to be confused about this issue, but now it’s clear. Let’s analyze whether you need it or not.

First of all, your main purpose of shooting is tourism, that is, cultural scenery, so the F4 aperture is not only a small lens but also cheap, and it does not need to take pictures of people (in fact, it is okay to take pictures of people with telephoto blur). F4 is preferred because humanities and landscapes basically do not require a large aperture.

The main reason for choosing F2.8 is that it is not lacking in money and stamina. For portrait shooting, there is a very high demand for blur when shooting a large number of people. In this case, you must choose F2.8 or buy an F4 lens.

If you are not the one mentioned above, F4 is actually very economical, especially when shooting scenery, F2.8 will be used in rare cases, but in such rare cases, how often do you have the chance to use it? What about filming?

In addition, the design positioning analysis is also in line with our analysis. The F4 lens is designed and positioned as a travel landscape lens. For photographers who shoot long-range shots, F2.8 is useless, and it is light and cheap. It’s very comfortable to take photos of scenery and people.

F2.8 is designed and positioned as a large-aperture lens for portraits. If used to shoot landscapes, it is a little overqualified, but it is undeniable that F2.8 is an all-round lens that is also very good for shooting landscapes, not to mention that it can also shoot portraits. With such a large constant aperture, the blur is incredible.

In the final analysis, I recommend buying F4 for scenery and travel. It has many portraits and scenery, and is not afraid of weight or price. It is necessary to buy F2.8. What else can I say? I hope my answer can give you some suggestions. Thank you.

Not worth it

Ying 2470

The 70-200 lens is definitely worth owning. In order to have a relaxed and happy mood during the trip, you still have to consider your physical conditions. Properly equipped, telephoto or short focus is just the same distance.

I like traveling. If you are not a professional photographer, I think it should be OK to carry a 70-200F4 instead of F2.8.

F2.8 is relatively expensive, both expensive and heavy, but it has a large aperture and good blur effects, and has more advantages when shooting in low light. F4 is cheaper and lighter. If you don’t plan to develop into a professional photographer, using F4 is not a big problem.

But the question is, do you plan to travel with just this lens?

It is true that the medium-to-telephoto F4 is good for shooting scenery during travel, but it is more suitable for close-ups, and the grandeur of some scenery requires a wide angle to reflect it. In addition, sometimes you will visit some buildings during your trip. At this time, the 70-200 will be at a disadvantage and you will not be able to take pictures of them all.

Therefore, I would suggest buying another wide-angle lens. If the wide-angle zoom lens is too expensive, then add a wide-angle fixed focus lens, which is lightweight. In this way, you can basically cope with the scenarios you encounter during the trip.

The above humble opinion is ridiculous. pat!

First of all, I think focal lengths such as 24-105 and 24-240 are more suitable for travel photography. The focal lengths cover a wide range of close-ups and distant views. Focal lengths like 70-200 are more suitable for portraits and close-ups. The aperture of 4 is indeed smaller, and you have to lose the wide-angle end. If you travel, most of the scenery is beautiful, and the wide-angle can better reflect the breadth and majesty of nature.

Therefore, I think that considering factors such as light travel, comprehensive image quality and size, 24-240 is more suitable for travel and pursuit of comprehensiveness.

24-105 is a balanced choice in terms of size and image quality