How to resume trading after the delisting of 5A scenic spot?

After Shanhaiguan was delisted 20 15 due to poor price management, four AAA scenic spots in Xuancheng, Anhui Province were delisted. As more and more scenic spots are delisted, a question is placed in front of us: how do the delisted scenic spots "resume trading"?

Article 3 of the Measures for the Administration of Quality Classification of Tourist Attractions stipulates that the quality classification of tourist attractions should follow the principles of voluntary declaration, grading evaluation, dynamic management and classification guidance, in which dynamic management is clearly included in the management category. However, for many years, this management model has existed in name only, especially many scenic spots have won the gold medal of avoiding death after successfully establishing the 5A-level scenic spots, which has led to many problems such as lax management, declining service quality, price fraud and poor environmental sanitation.

20 15 10, Shanhaiguan scenic spot became the first 5A-level scenic spot to be delisted, which really kicked off the dynamic management of A-level assessment of scenic spots. According to the official public information of the National Tourism Administration, up to now, the national 39 1 A scenic spots have been dealt with in four ways, such as warning, informed criticism, lowering or canceling the level, including 3 scenic spots with 5A level, 65 scenic spots with 4A level and 52 scenic spots with 3A level.

Delisting unqualified scenic spots or giving serious warnings has really set a good direction for the tourism market. However, for these scenic spots, especially the delisted 5A scenic spots, how to restore or rebuild the original level, tourism law and other laws and regulations have not given a clear answer. Article 28 of the Measures for the Administration of Quality Grades of Tourist Attractions, revised and promulgated by the National Tourism Administration, stipulates that a scenic spot that has been delisted "may not reapply for grades within 1 year", but there is no clear stipulation on how to apply after 1 year.

It is certainly a good thing for the National Tourism Administration to seriously implement the dynamic management system, but if there is only an exit mechanism and no clear re-entry mechanism in policy, it will undoubtedly make the dynamic management system in a semi-dynamic embarrassing situation.

Do I have to go through the first application procedure before applying for Grade 5A again? On this issue, I don't think it is the same as creating a new scenic spot to re-declare the level of the scenic spot that has been removed from the list, and there is no need to specify a specific time when re-application is not allowed.

Relevant departments should simplify the declaration procedures and build a sound quality monitoring and evaluation system. As a quality certification system led by the administrative department, the key of A-level standard of tourist attractions lies in certification. For the scenic spots that apply for creation (certification), including those that have been delisted or downgraded, it is entirely possible to conduct irregular inspection, evaluation and certification, and grant permission or resume trading if all conditions meet the standards; At the same time, the existing A-level scenic spots are reviewed irregularly, and they will be delisted if they fail to meet the standards, so that the dynamic management is not only truly normalized, but also truly dynamic.

It must be clear that the evaluation standard of A-level scenic spots is only a quality certification system, not the only standard for evaluating scenic spots. All scenic spots should accept the supervision of government agencies and tourists with a positive and optimistic attitude, face the problems calmly and make positive rectification. In fact, rectification can inject new vitality into the scenic spot and promote its better development.

I hope all the scenic spots will be improved as soon as possible.