How should the tourism planning and development of tourist attractions with average resources be done well? Is there any plan copy for reference?

The question in question is relatively big. As a practitioner, I will try to answer it. The first thing I want to say is that the development of a scenic spot is not a problem that can be solved by a set of planning texts. Many scenic spots will go through rounds of planning, from general plans to general plans, control plans and even detailed revisions, but planning can solve It is always just a matter of development ideas. When it comes to the actual operation level, you will encounter many problems. These problems determine whether the scenic spot is completed. So I understand this question as: The main question is how to create a good-looking planning text in an area with poor resources. My understanding of poor resources is that not only the natural scenery is poor, but also the cultural heritage and surrounding industrial support are poor. The mountains and rivers may not be beautiful, and there are a lot of chemical industry zones around. Then I think the main problem is that the resources of this scenic spot are poor. If this is the case, why does your Party A want to develop here? What is his real purpose? Do you want to travel well? Or do you just want to get some land under the guise of tourism? Do you understand Party A’s demands? Well, assuming that Party A really wants to develop tourism, then it should dig deep into the context of the place, dig hard, dig three feet into the ground, and dig with open minds. After digging, list one, two, three, four, and put With. Then think about the overall domestic situation, the priority of the national maker ecology, and what can be combined with the natural foundation or cultural heritage of your base, then the direction of tourism development should be there. The questioner must have an idea of ??what to do next with this case. As for the book requested by the questioner, I don’t have it. Finally, I was a little excited to answer the question for the first time.

>_