Shenzhen girl was murdered while traveling alone in Huashan: Why is “danger awareness” always ignored?

According to media reports, on July 16, a 27-year-old Shenzhen girl disappeared after visiting Huashan alone. Before losing contact, the girl left a string of "strange numbers" in her circle of friends. On July 19, the family received a call from local police telling them the girl had been killed. The suspect has been arrested. The police initially suspected that he was "robbing money." The details of the case are still under investigation. According to reports, the girl's boyfriend said: "The family's request is that the murderer be brought to justice. We all want him to be sentenced to death. We don't want compensation, we want him to pay the price with his life."

There have been similar killings of women. There doesn't really seem to be any added sexual value other than "first time" anger at the murderer. Ultimately, family and public perceptions of safety issues are similar. Everyone was told to "walk slowly" and "be careful." Even in some places where safety hazards exist, very eye-catching "safety warnings" will appear.

In short, the awareness of “emphasis on safety” has become widespread. Unfortunately, the more you stress about something, the less seriously you take anything. Even, to some extent, "taking the dangerous road" has become a sign of bravery. Therefore, in many cases, the same thing will present two completely different evaluations due to different results.

Take "traveling alone" as an example. In most cases, it is no problem. However, when something goes wrong, it can be a big problem. As with many things, the lower the probability, the bigger the problem. For example, the original intention of "Shenzhen Girls Lone Ranger Huashan Tour" may be to experience the free experience of "Lone Ranger Tour", which is also an activity that most independent women are passionate about.

However, when a "low probability" malignant event occurs, all problems are unavoidable. Of course, some people will say, there are many people "traveling alone", why was she killed? This type of question is a bit ironic, but it reflects the uncertainty of a dangerous situation. Frankly speaking, outdoor travel is prone to accidents, so traveling in groups is a mainstream choice.

As for "traveling alone", many people only see the tenacity of independent experience, but do not see the dangerous side. Even after some people successfully complete a "solo trip", they use their personal experiences to set an example for nature. But in fact, these are all about seeing the positive side, while the negative side is often ignored and hidden.

The "danger awareness" and the "brave label" are always lurking in the background. However, many times, people only see the "brave label" but ignore the "danger awareness". Furthermore, “danger awareness” is mostly “hindsight.” In fact, it is impossible that the murdered Shenzhen girl did not know the possible risks of "traveling alone". She may even have received well-intentioned advice from her close friends and relatives.

Unfortunately, when many things happen, they often happen on the track that you least want to believe. Of course, all this is unpredictable. Yet evoked for "Murder by the Storm" and deconstructed for "Awareness of Danger." First of all, for women, learning to protect themselves is an ongoing topic. But there are still a lot of women who get into trouble at night.

In the world we live in, although there is the maintenance of public security and order, self-defense is often the most necessary behavior when there is a sudden infringement. But when it comes to self-defense, not everyone can do it. Therefore, being "danger aware" is particularly important. Because foreseeable hazards can often be predicted in advance. Take "travel" as an example. "Traveling together" is definitely safer than "traveling alone". There is no doubt about it.

However, in traditional concepts, people easily confuse "cowardice" with "security awareness". But in fact, even for timid individuals, what's the problem as long as they don't affect the surrounding environment? Unfortunately, many people mistake safety and caution for cowardice, which is a great shame. Under this cognitive logic, natural security has completely fallen into the shadows.

However, judging from the actual results, there is a very interesting phenomenon. People who drown can often swim. This shows that the more fearless people are, the more likely they are to be diagnosed with a disease. However, those who look sick always save themselves. So sometimes in the face of danger, caution is often more important than courage.

This has been verified in actual experience, so there is no need to say too much. Unfortunately, danger falls from the sky when danger emerges as a proof paradigm. This is also evident in "Selfie." The vast majority of selfie takers like to risk all kinds of risks to get some kind of thrilling satisfaction, but they forget that they may have devoted half their lives to luck.

Of course, both men and women should be concerned about the risks of traveling alone. Generally speaking, women should not travel alone. But the reality is that both men and women can be at risk in unfamiliar situations. Therefore, people often say, don't try to bluff, if you don't do it well, you will easily get into trouble.

"Solo travel" has been very popular for a long time. People always believe that only by exploring the unknown alone can we better feel the so-called poetry and distance. However, while "poetry and distance" are easy to obtain, "death and distance" are also quietly approaching. Especially for outdoor play, we should pay more attention to similar issues.

Romance is still romantic, but safety still needs to be ensured.

Here, returning to the "Shenzhen Girl Traveling Alone in Huashan and Being Murdered", for the crowd outside, in addition to being angry at the murderer's atrocities, it is more important to embrace "danger awareness." After all, you only live once, so it’s better to be cautious. Only in this way can we better explore more diverse "poetry and distance". Otherwise, in order to prove momentary independence, one risks losing freedom forever.