Five people went on a trip and one person also happened. My uncle sued my niece. What's suspicious about her daughter?

Only one person returned from a family of five in Nanjing? The aftermath of the incident is still unsettled. After Miao Keyan, the only survivor of this incident, sued her uncle Qian Liyong for inheritance, Qian Liyong took her niece Miao Keyan to court on the grounds of infringement. He asked the court to order Miao Keyan to compensate his father Qian Xude, his mother Huang Hongying for death compensation, funeral expenses and spiritual damages, totaling about 87, yuan.

Last year, Qian Liyong, a resident of Tangshan Street, Jiangning District, Nanjing, reported to the media that five of his relatives had been away from home for ten months, and strange things happened one after another. His sister Qian Limei committed suicide by jumping off a building at the top of a hotel in Shangqiu, Henan Province. The bodies of his father Qian Xude, his mother Huang Fuyong and his aunt Li Lanzhen were found in the freezer of a rented house in Jinjing Garden, Luohu District, Shenzhen. After police investigation, the homicide was ruled out, and it was not recognized as a criminal case. The only one of the five people who went home was Qian Liyong's niece Miao Keyan. So, isn't it a bit suspicious?

Yesterday, the trial focused on three controversial issues, such as whether Miao Keyan and her mother were at fault for the deaths of Qian Xude and others. The two sides exchanged evidence and opinions in court. Qian Liyong's cousin and Li Lanzhen's son, Qian Libiao, also testified in court, claiming that Miao Keyan and his mother, Qian Limei, took Li Lanzhen to other places for many times without telling their families.

Qian Liyong believes that the old man was with Miao Keyan from the time he went out to his death, and Miao Keyan witnessed the whole process. During this period, she did not inform her family or report the case to the police for assistance. ? Miao Keyan, the organizer of travel activities, should take care of the elderly during her outing. However, she neglected the life and health of the elderly, and the serious consequences of failing to treat her relatives were predictable. She was unshirkable responsible for the consequences of the death of the elderly, which caused serious mental harm to other relatives. According to Articles 18 and 22 of the Tort Liability Law, she requested the court to make a fair judgment. ? He wrote in the complaint.