Help make a PPT before class on the conflict between China and Vietnam in the South China Sea.

Historically, more than 200 years BC, Qin Shihuang sent Zhao Kuo's descendants to levy Baiyue, and the Yue people began to enter the circle of Chinese civilization; ..... It was China's army that surrendered on1August 5, 945 15, and accepted the Japanese flag in Vietnam. 1950, "Dean Bianfu" won a great victory, which laid a solid foundation for the founding of the People's Republic of China. The teacher is General Chen Geng and the teacher is General Wei Guoqing. In the early 1970s, American troops withdrew from zhina Peninsula because the American people opposed the geopolitical strategic tacit understanding with the anti-Soviet strategy of China and the United States, and then it was the "lesson" of China's army against Hanoi.

At present, when the China Air Force first used rockets and free-falling bombs to drill air and sea attacks, it already had the ultra-long-range precision strike capability (H-6K+CJ-10) thousands of kilometers away. When China clamored to buy six kilograms, it would take 15 years to form combat effectiveness, the Chinese Amur, a new type of "Yuan" class that surpassed Kibas, of the Vietnamese navy, had entered the South China Sea for routine combat patrol ... The military equipment level and war capability of China and Vietnam were not at the same level at all, let alone winning! ?

Can we say "barking dogs is not evil"? That's weird.

The South China Sea is regarded as "the next Persian Gulf" by the world energy community. In the southwest of the South China Sea, the Xisha Islands claimed by Vietnam are about 300 kilometers away from its land boundary, and the Nansha Islands are about 1000 kilometers away. At present, Xisha is under the actual control of China's army. Besides China and Viet Nam, there are also Philippine, Malaysian and Brunei. Among them, Vietnam's naval and air force strength ranks third after China and Malaysia (if we consider the contribution rate of history and tradition to the naval and air force, its actual ranking is even lower, roughly below the Philippines). However, among all the countries claiming sovereignty over the South China Sea, Vietnam is the most hostile country, and it is also the country with the highest voice for expanding the strength of the navy and air force in recent years. Its purpose is nothing more than hoping to get a share of oil resources in the South China Sea.

Under the modern international political order and framework, the problems of disputes in the South China Sea lie in: it is almost impossible to change the status quo of actual control if acts of war are excluded; If a military solution is implemented, it will be unacceptable to the modern international political order and framework-otherwise it will become a "global public enemy." I believe that the political leaders of the countries involved in the South China Sea dispute are well aware of this crux, and of course, this includes the Vietnamese! For example, Vietnam recently announced that it will conduct live-fire exercises in the South China Sea in mid-June. In fact, this "South China Sea" is not the waters around the South China Sea-Weng Island, about 40 kilometers away from the central Vietnamese coastline, almost close to its 12 nautical mile territorial line, and about 250 kilometers away from Xisha, China. This is obviously not a "provocation against China".

Since Vietnam knows that surrender in the South China Sea is not feasible, why talk about it?

The real reason is that after the completion of the Southeast Asian Railway, which runs through Kunming, Laos, Thailand and Malaysia in China and reaches the northern end of the Straits of Malacca and the Indian Ocean, Vietnam, located on the east side of Indo-China Peninsula, will completely lose the strategic depth of transnational politics, economy and military (that is, Laos) on which it has been developing for 60 years, and its strategic space for land geo-development is difficult to provide real sustainable development support due to "congenital defects". That is, the "development strategy to the mainland" will be adjusted to the "development strategy to the ocean"-in this respect, Vietnam is somewhat similar to Japan: after World War II, it withdrew from the competition in the Asian continent, went all out to "attack the city and plunder the land" in the Sea of Japan, the East China Sea and the East, West and South Pacific Oceans, and seized the "four northern islands", Zhudao, Diaoyu Island, Okinawa US military base and the "rushing bird".

Vietnam, the "Japanese" on the southern border of China. Misfortune and happiness?

Among the countries around the South China Sea, Vietnam is the only country that has fought with most of its neighbors, including Thailand, Cambodia, Malaysia, the Philippines and China. Among them, China, Cambodia and Thailand fought on land; China, Malaysia and the Philippines fought at sea.

It is worth noting that all the above-mentioned foreign military actions of Vietnam took place after the 1970s, when it was drifting away from its neighbor China (comrade plus brother) and embracing its ally Russia thousands of miles away. At present, when Vietnam speaks harshly to its neighboring countries again, all the main battle equipment platforms of land, sea and air, such as Su -30, Kilo, S-300, Cheetah and Club, which it owns or hopes to own as soon as possible, also come from Russia.

Can it be said that "Vietnam and Russia are once again allied"?

It doesn't look like this. First of all, today's Russia is not yesterday's Soviet Russia, and being tied to the "South China Sea chariot" by Vietnam is not in line with Russia's core strategic interests. Secondly, unlike more than 30 years ago, Russia's provision of main battle equipment to Vietnam is no longer a "free aid from the big brother of socialism", but a "standard" cash and futures transaction in the arms market. That is, Vietnam and Russia are "commercial relations rather than alliance relations."

From the point of view of military strategy, even though Vietnam has a series of Russian-made main battle equipment listed above, it is more appropriate to say that it is not so much a "deterrent" to its opponents as a "propaganda offensive" to hype up the West's battle with Nansha, which is 300 km-1000 km away. Because even S-300 air defense missiles and "Club" shore-to-ship missiles have a maximum effective range of less than 200 kilometers; Without long-wave and ultra-long-wave radio stations (the latter is only owned by the United States, Russia and China in the world), even the "Kilo" of the marine killer can only do chores such as secretly transporting goods or VIPs like the Japanese "submarine carrier" in World War II 60 years ago, and it can basically be said that it has no combat capability.

According to public opinion, "Vietnam wants to single out China by buying Russian heavy equipment". As far as the technical level of the main battle equipment platforms currently installed by the Chinese and Vietnamese armed forces is concerned, this statement is really outrageous!

Here is another question: Why doesn't Vietnam seek from the United States to buy more advanced military equipment than Russia? For example, F- 15 "Air Eagle" or "Ali? Burke-class guided missile destroyer. " In Southeast Asia, the Philippines was originally a colony and "protectorate" of the United States, while Thailand was an ally of the United States. More than 40 years ago, both the Philippines and Thailand participated in the "Vietnam War" led by the United States. Obviously, the Philippines and Thailand are the "iron buddies" of the United States, while Vietnam is not.

According to Yahoo Electronic News, the Philippine Star reported in June 1 1 that Ali, one of the most powerful destroyers in the United States? The Burke-class guided missile destroyer Gordon pai' ea chung-hoon was independently deployed in the South China Sea and the Sulu Sea (that is, between Vietnam and the Philippines) earlier this week to safeguard the "freedom of navigation" of ships in the above areas.

Before Vietnam publicly announced that it would conduct military exercises in the South China Sea and warned other countries' ships to stay away from the exercise waters, the fact that an Aegis-class destroyer of the United States had sailed to the South China Sea and deployed in the waters between Vietnam and the Philippines itself showed that it had no intention of giving strength to the Vietnamese US military in the South China Sea dispute. The first choice for American defense-Jianfeng pointed to Vietnam, which has purchased or continues to purchase a large number of Russian air and sea main battle equipment.

In all fairness, Vietnam, which is basically in the backward stage of "agricultural economy", is eager to enter a more advanced "industrial economy" society as soon as possible, and its desire is understandable. The problem lies in the development path chosen by Vietnam: following Japan's example, advancing into the ocean and broadening the development space; Dominate the South China Sea and monopolize the rich oil and gas resources in the "Second Persian Gulf"; Learn from Russia, sell resources and accumulate financial resources for technology, and promote the early establishment of industrialized economy. As far as comprehensive national strength is concerned, Vietnam is certainly not "Japan". But as far as the "national expansion strategy" is concerned, Vietnam and Japan are indeed quite similar, that is, after the land expansion is frustrated (blocked), they both point the strategic edge to the ocean; Vietnam and Japan carry out the strategy of expanding their marine "territory", which is based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, that is, international law.

On the contrary, China's claim to sovereignty is based on "historical facts".

China people emphasize that facts speak louder than words.

Outsiders insist that international law is the basis and norm of the world order and institutional framework since the18th century.

Right or wrong?

In the South China Sea dispute, due to the different "foundations" that China and Vietnam rely on, it can be said with certainty that it is impossible for the other side to respect its position and then compromise!

This is an inextricable knot in the Sino-Vietnamese "South China Sea dispute" (including the Sino-Japanese "Diaoyu Islands dispute").

It is unrealistic to rely on its annual military expenditure of more than 2.6 billion US dollars (far less than Pakistan's 3.8 billion US dollars) to attack an annual military expenditure of more than 60 billion US dollars, which has a historical record of repeated wars and defeats. Today, the enemy has little chance of winning. Therefore, the Vietnamese are unwilling to go to war with China in their bones.

China has no intention of going to war unless it is attacked by force. Because once the war spreads, China will lose the second period of strategic opportunities for development, which is not in line with our core interests.

In fact, China and most of its neighbors (including Viet Nam) do not have a rigid historical fact of "holding their own views" in resolving land border disputes, but follow international laws or practices. For example, the land boundary runs along the ridge, and the boundary river (river) runs along the middle line of the waterway. From this point of view, it is very likely that China will settle its maritime disputes with other countries in accordance with international law (taking into account historical facts).

Because Vietnam's position is based on international law and is very realistic. In the South China Sea dispute between China and Vietnam, Vietnam has therefore occupied the commanding heights of international public opinion and morality. China is at a disadvantage for the time being. The reason is that Foreign Minister Yang rejected the "multilateral solution" at the Southeast Asia Forum last year and insisted on taking a bilateral road-one road leads to Montenegro.

Obviously, if we must return to the framework of international law to resolve the South China Sea dispute, multilateral solution is a feasible and favorable choice.

In fact, it is not stupid for China to "stubbornly" emphasize the historical facts of the South China Sea and "ignore" international law. We just hope to win time to establish and strengthen world-class offshore deep-water oil and gas resources exploration and development equipment.

The South China Sea belongs to the deep sea rich in oil and gas resources (more than 300m-1500m), and the core technologies and equipment of deep-sea oil and gas exploration and development operations have been monopolized by a few western countries. If we act in accordance with international law prematurely, China will completely lose its right to speak on the South China Sea issue; China's opposition can effectively block the time and frequency for western monopoly enterprises in deep-sea oil and gas development to reach out to the South China Sea, leaving them with sufficient advantages.

At present, China has invested 654.38+05 billion yuan to build a deep-sea oil and gas development operation fleet with major equipment such as "Haiyangshi 98 1" deep-water semi-submersible drilling platform, "Haiyangshou 20 1" deep-water pipe-laying crane and "Haiyangshou 720" deep-water three-dimensional seismic geophysical prospecting ship as the core. When they are carrying out oil and gas development in the South China Sea with a five-star red flag, and when China's oil drilling platforms are blooming everywhere in the South China Sea, they can naturally see the results. . . It is also a day of "facts speak louder than words" in this edition, which is in full compliance with international law!

But netizens should be calm. Now the situation in the South China Sea is under the control of China. We should use the wisdom of our big country. Despite Vietnam's hype, it's just a lot of thunder and little rain. Vietnam: Give it ten courage, and it won't move now. Actually, we are trying to move it in .................................................................................................................................................................... In fact, everyone only saw the media hype.

QQNo. 149295565 I wish you good health and a happy family! I wish the motherland prosperity, peace and prosperity! ! !