Which eight countries are fully effective in Trump's travel ban?

The State Council, USA: Trump's eight-nation travel ban takes full effect.

On February 9th, 65438, local time was 65438+February 8th, the State Council said that US President Trump's travel ban on citizens of six major Muslim countries was now fully effective. The State Council, USA, said that the ban will be implemented in all US embassies and consulates on Friday (8th) local time.

65438+ On February 4th, local time, the US Supreme Court announced the full adoption of the Trump administration's travel ban on eight countries (six of which are mainly Muslim countries). This judgment means that Trump will be able to ban or restrict people from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, North Korea and some Venezuelan government officials from entering the United States, even if they have relatives in the United States or are associated with American institutions.

According to reports, the Federal Supreme Court ruled that Trump's earlier travel ban on citizens of six Muslim countries and two non-Muslim countries was completely effective with 7 votes in favor and 2 votes against. Trump has every right to decide whether to completely ban or restrict citizens of these countries from entering the United States.

On the same day, the US Supreme Court stated in two similar documents that the lower court's ruling partially blocked the latest injunction, and the appeals courts in San Francisco and Richmond, Virginia were also weighing it. Both courts will hear the debate on the latest injunction this week. Previously, the lower court limited the scope of the ban to those who have no specific family or other connections with the United States. Trump's ban also includes some government officials in North Korea and Venezuela, but lower courts have previously allowed these provisions to take effect.

Once this ruling was published, it was criticized and accused by the United States and the international community. Some media in the Middle East believe that the judgment will make the relationship between the United States and Islamic countries more tense and the situation in the Middle East more complicated.

After the ruling was made that day, two liberal judges of the US Supreme Court said that they would refuse to accept the government's request. The ban was also challenged in a separate lawsuit between Hawaii and the American Civil Liberties Union. Opponents claim that this latest ban, like earlier bans, violates the US Constitution and discriminates against Muslims.

It is reported that in June 5438+10 this year, Trump issued a travel ban for the first time to a number of Muslim-majority countries. After being rejected by the federal court, a revised injunction was issued in March. After a long court debate in September, the revised ban was replaced by the current version. The ban, approved by the US Supreme Court, is the third version of this "controversial policy".

At present, the long-term impact of this ruling cannot be judged, but as the Maryland District Circuit Court said in its previous ruling, this nationality-based travel ban for more than 654.38 billion people in eight countries is unprecedented. There is still a great debate about whether this obvious discrimination based on nationality violates federal law and how much discretion the president has in immigration law.

Some media in the Middle East believe that the introduction of the travel ban is Trump's fulfillment of his campaign promise, and it is also to reflect the "US priority" position, and it is also due to Trump and his team's consistent prejudice against Muslims. In the future, the relationship between the United States and Islamic countries will be more tense and the situation in the Middle East will be more complicated.