Canon's lens 18-55+55-200 or 18- 135 is better? Mainly for travel and family use, I want to take some photos of people and scenery.

Personally, I think it is better to match 18- 135: First, it is mainly used for tourism and family, especially tourism. One lens is relatively convenient, and you don't need a tripod to travel. The telephoto of 18- 135 is actually 2 16MM, so it is difficult to stabilize the telephoto end without a tripod. Secondly, the focal length of 18- 135 (actually 29-2 16MM) has been able to meet the daily travel and home use, and the overall quality of 18- 135 is slightly better than that of 18-55 and/kloc-0. 18- 135 was originally made for 7D. Although people say it's a dog's head, Canon was originally made for the professional mid-range 7D. It can be seen that 18- 135 has good practicability (you can travel all over the world in one shot), and the film quality can meet most shooting requirements.

Satisfied, please adopt.