Comments on 3 essays of 2000 words.

Notre Dame de Paris is the masterpiece of Hugo, a famous French writer in the19th century. This novel describes the bizarre life in Paris in the15th century. The author depicts a group of vivid and artistic characters by contrast, and analyzes the rich and complex human world with complicated contradictions and tragic fate.

The first group is gypsy woman Esmeralda and quasimodo, the bell ringer. 16-year-old Esmeralda is beautiful, pure and kind, and can sing and dance well, but at that time, such a beautiful life was tragically destroyed by the extremely conservative and decadent church forces. Quasimodo, 20, is extremely ugly. His severe disability made him abandoned by his relatives as soon as he came to this world, and then by the whole society. However, although he is ugly, he has a beautiful and pure heart. He guarded Esmeralda with pure love without any impurities, trying to keep her away from all harm. However, in the face of powerful social prejudice and evil forces, the personal strength is really insignificant, and the tenacious quasimodo finally had to choose favoritism as the tragic ending. The two protagonists have intertwined unfortunate lives, and the great contrast in appearance can't hide their pure and kind nature. Other characters in the novel exposed their despicable nature under the irradiation of their perfect and beautiful nature.

Frollo, the vice bishop of Notre Dame, also fell in love with the beautiful Esmeralda, but his love with quasimodo was quite different. Frollo wore the sacred aura of the clergy, but he was unable to extricate himself because of the conflict until his soul was twisted and filled with evil desire for destruction, which eventually destroyed Esmeralda and himself. Hugo deeply analyzed the dark and twisted soul of this character with a compassionate attitude. The other two distinctive figures, one is Captain Phobos, with gorgeous appearance but a bag of rotten meat at heart? A rough and shallow playboy played an infatuated Esmeralda with extremely bad means; The other is the lonely poet Glenn Guvo, who lives in the cracks. In order to survive, he can abandon love, dignity and responsibility. The author's description of these two characters is also full of contempt and ridicule.

This novel not only reveals the essence of the dark society at that time from humanitarianism, but also tells us many profound life truths: first of all, a person's appearance can't decide everything. What is more important than appearance is the heart. People can't pursue the beauty of appearance excessively, but the purity and sincerity of the soul are what we need in our life. Similarly, we should judge a person by his inner qualities, not by his appearance. Because under the ugly appearance, there may be a fiery and innocent heart hidden; Under the handsome and beautiful face, dirty, shameful, despicable and twisted people may also be buried deep. This is exemplified by the characters in the novel. Their results are also a warning to us. Secondly, people living in the world should have positive life ideals and goals, and they should not drift with the tide and wander around. At any moment, they should have personal dignity and be clear about their tasks. You can't pollute your responsible mind by indulging yourself. Finally, we should learn to cherish the feelings between people: affection, friendship and love? Respect everyone around you, don't wait for these wonderful highlights of life to pass before you regret it. These, the characters in the story all show us the thought-provoking negative tragic consequences.

Finally, Hugo's magnificent writing scene, exquisite character description, exquisite metaphor, wonderful description and capture of details all add a lot of color to the novel, which makes people relaxed and happy after reading it. These skills can also be used for reference in our usual writing to make the article more exciting!

In19th century, in the starry French literary world, Victor? Hugo is arguably the brightest star. He is a great poet, a famous playwright and novelist, and also the flag bearer and leader of the French romantic literature movement. Notre Dame de Paris, a great work, is his first sensational romantic novel. Its literary value and far-reaching significance to society have made it reprinted again and again today after nearly two centuries, thus reaching my hands.

In the process of reading this book, I felt a strong? Beauty and ugliness contrast? . The characters and events in the book, even if they come from real life, have been greatly exaggerated and strengthened. Under the writer's rich colors, they formed a gorgeous and strange picture, forming a bright and even incredible contrast between good and evil, beauty and ugliness.

The plot of Notre Dame always revolves around three people: Esmeralda, a kind and beautiful girl, and Claude, a cruel and hypocritical vice bishop of Notre Dame. Frollo and quasimodo, ugly bell ringers with lofty hearts.

Bohemian girl Esmeralda is the darling of Paris tramps, who make a living by busking in the streets. She is innocent, compassionate and helpful. Because she couldn't bear to see an innocent man executed, she accepted the poet Gan Guo Wa as her nominal husband to save his life. Seeing quasimodo whipped in the scorching sun, only she will feel pity and send water to the thirsty bell ringer's lips. Such a noble-minded girl was slandered by the church and the court as? Witch? 、? A murderer? Sentenced to hang. The author portrays this character as the embodiment of beauty and goodness, which makes her spiritual beauty and external beauty completely unified, thus arousing readers' infinite sympathy for her, and thus generating strong resentment against feudal churches and kingship.

As for the Bishop Claude and the bell ringer quasimodo, these are two completely opposite images. On the surface, Claude is hypocritical and leads a life of austerities and abstinence, but in his heart, he longs for the pleasure of lewdness and is full of envy for worldly enjoyment. Selfish, insidious and unscrupulous. Quasimodo, a hunchbacked, one-eyed, deaf-mute and lame freak, was discriminated and bullied by the world since he was a child. In Esmeralda, he first experienced the warmth of people's hearts. Since then, this eccentric with a vulgar and savage appearance has pinned all his life and enthusiasm on Esmeralda. He can go through fire and water for her and sacrifice everything for her happiness.

This extreme contrast between beauty and ugliness, and the absolute opposition between sublime and evil make the novel have a shocking power, which can sweep away all our thoughts and feelings. This may be the charm of romance novels.

In Notre Dame de Paris, the author describes the lowest people, vagrants and beggars in Paris with great sympathy. They are ragged and rude, but they have virtues far beyond those of the so-called educated civilized world. The virtues of mutual assistance, love, integrity, courage and self-sacrifice. In the novel, the scene of Paris tramps attacking Notre Dame to save Esmeralda is tragic, intense, impassioned and thrilling. Obviously, to some extent, it incorporates the heroism of the people of Paris in the July Revolution and the destruction of Paris Saint-Germain Church and Archbishop's Office by the people of Paris. When the novel is written here, it is also the mouth of the characters who borrow books, predicting that the people will rise up and destroy the Bastille, alluding to the outbreak of the 1789 Great Revolution.

After reading, 2000-word model essay II

Probably when I was in middle school, I heard of the world famous book Les Miserables, but I haven't seen it for many years. The main reason is that I don't like reading foreign novels. The descriptions, narratives and arguments in them are too verbose and boring, almost unlike novels.

What prompted me to read this masterpiece this time is many people and things I have heard and seen for more than 30 years.

This masterpiece shows us a picture of the miserable life of the people at the bottom of France more than 100 years ago, which makes people cry and makes people think deeply.

Jean Valjean, the hero, is an industrious and poor honest man. He was sentenced to five years in prison for stealing a loaf of bread, because he couldn't bear to starve his nephew and niece. In prison, he was sentenced to 19 because he was afraid that his widowed sister's family would have no life and escaped from prison many times. The long-term persecution in prison gave him the idea of revenge against society. After he got out of prison, he stole the silver of Miriam, the bishop who kindly accompanied him, and robbed a child of his money. Instead of handing him over, the bishop gave him a pair of silver candlesticks, urging him to repay good for evil and give generously.

Under the guidance of the bishop, Jean Valjean's kindness, which had been mutilated for many years, germinated and was thoroughly remoulded. After wandering to a city, I made a fortune and built a factory because of technological innovation. After making a fortune, he devoted himself to helping the poor, was widely praised and was promoted to mayor. Fantine, the mother of a poor little girl Cosette, was forced to become a prostitute because she was unemployed and could not afford to raise children. She also received the selfless help of Jean Valjean. However, the good times did not last long, and he was finally arrested and imprisoned for stealing the bishop's silverware and seizing the children's money. Of course, as a result, the poor people he helped began to live a miserable life again.

Hugo, the author of this book, thinks that this is caused by hateful laws.

He said in the preface of this book:? As long as there is social oppression caused by laws and customs, Hugo thinks that the reason of social misery is the oppression of laws and customs, and even just laws and just law enforcers are also the reasons of social misery. Hugo tried to tell us in his book: would society be different if the philanthropist mayor Jean Valjean was not arrested for a little theft? A just law, while safeguarding the interests of a few people, has created greater suffering. We have to say that this understanding has some truth, but we also have to say that this is the author's limitation in understanding.

Hugo is a man who pursues freedom and praises the revolution. He also believes that the lack of freedom and equality is also the cause of social suffering. He has romantic fantasies. He is optimistic that if society gives people freedom and equality, coupled with charity, then society will be very beautiful and no longer miserable. We also have to say that this is also the author's limitation.

In fact, it is not laws, bad habits or lack of freedom and equality that cause social suffering, but the economic system, which has little to do with politics.

Misery is an economic problem, and economic problems should be caused by the economic system, not politics. Zhang San is ill, so don't treat Li Si.

Economic system can be divided into private ownership and public ownership. Private ownership is the fundamental system of private ownership society, and public ownership is the fundamental system of public ownership society.

Private ownership is precisely the tragic source of private ownership society. As long as this system exists, society is a miserable society and the world is a miserable world, whether there is a democratic revolution or not; As long as this fundamental reason is not removed, the world will always be miserable, regardless of whether people are free and equal. In the autocratic society before 2000, private ownership existed, so it was a miserable world before 2000, not just France 100 years ago. Private ownership existed in Denmark more than 100 years ago, so there is? The little match girl? /kloc-More than 0/00 years ago, Cosette in France was a poor little girl. Today? After a thousand years, if private ownership still exists, the world will still be miserable, and exactly the same thing will still happen, regardless of democracy, freedom and equality.

Hugo also said in the preface of this book:? Poverty makes men poor, hunger deprives women, and darkness weakens children. ? Is this sentence correct? Of course it is correct.

If young Jean Valjean was not poor, he wouldn't steal bread. However, Hugo did not delve into this sentence. What causes poverty, hunger and darkness? How to eliminate poverty, hunger and darkness? He didn't delve into it. Or did he dig deeper and get the wrong answer? He believes that freedom, equality and charity can eliminate poverty, hunger and darkness.

He didn't know that private ownership caused poverty, hunger and darkness. If private ownership is not eliminated, poverty, hunger and darkness will exist forever, and tragic stories will be repeated again and again.

In private ownership, of course, the slogan of freedom and equality can also be put forward. Freedom and equality can certainly be done well, but freedom and equality without public ownership are rootless trees, castles in the air and illusory.

In private ownership, after the democratic revolution, although the autocratic hierarchy was abolished, although there were no restrictions imposed by hierarchy and laws, freedom and equality were restricted by money. Every penny has freedom and equality, and every penny has freedom and equality. Five-star hotel, can the poor enter? Although the law allows it, the poor still can't get in. Although it is hateful that the law does not allow inferior people to enter under the hierarchical system, after the democratic revolution, the hierarchical system was abolished and the poor still could not enter. Isn't this freedom and equality empty and slogan-like? The democratic revolution of private ownership can certainly abolish unreasonable laws, but it cannot abolish the money of the rich.

Can charity change the miserable world? Hugo said in the book:? The fraternity of the upper class can't compare with the poverty of the lower class? In other words, charity from the government is a drop in the bucket and useless. What about charity from the people? Hugo praised Jean Valjean for his charity. He seems to think it's okay. Perhaps he thinks that if all capitalists can be as charitable as Jean Valjean, then society will be better. Can it actually be like this?

Don't say that all capitalists are not kind, even if they are kind, they can't do it.

For thousands of years, private ownership has always had an unknown hidden rule in wealth distribution, that is, workers are not allowed to be rich. Why? Because people of insight believe that if workers are well paid, they can't spend all their wages in two years and earn enough money for two lives, then workers will lose their motivation to work, and they may have to travel, cultivate their morality and so on, so that no one will create wealth and capitalists will not be able to recruit workers. This is terrible.

Therefore, workers can only be given extremely low remuneration, so that they can only support their families, spend first and then earn, and can only work continuously. Everyone knows that people who release osprey, who release osprey, don't give osprey enough to eat, and they don't catch fish when they are full. And does the osprey think so? Of course, it is absolutely impossible for those who fly the osprey to consider the problem from the standpoint of the osprey. So, someone simply shouted blatantly:? Is the polarization between the rich and the poor conducive to social development? Is the olive-shaped social structure the best? .

Therefore, private ownership society does not allow everyone to be rich, nor does it allow people to have equal economic status. In other words, the poverty and misery of some people are people of insight or private ownership society, which has long been planned and must exist. At the beginning of this article, I said that Jean Valjean was a hard-working poor man. Why does he say he is hardworking and poor? For more than 30 years, we have been taught to get rich through hard work. It stands to reason that efforts cannot be linked to poverty, only eating, drinking, gambling, idleness and poverty can be linked to it. However, what we see is that the vast number of hardworking workers and farmers are poor. Why? Is the osprey principle. So, can we expect private ownership to eliminate suffering? It didn't save so much pain.

Today, although this masterpiece has some limitations, it is still of great significance to progress. It depicts the miserable life of the bottom people with realism and actively explores solutions. Only its realism and its description of the miserable life of the bottom people are enough for many authors to learn. We have all read many novels, many plays and movies, but we seldom see those that take the bottom people as the theme and reflect their miserable lives. I know I only read a few books more than 30 years ago. Four Great Classical Novels, isn't it? No. Especially now, romance, fantasy, funny, funny, fighting, but not these. The author has no sense of social responsibility, just wants to make money and always caters to low tastes. Most people at the bottom, why didn't they write their realistic books? Please be more realistic, less romantic and more socially responsible. Of course, the lack of publication may also be a reason.

After reading 2000 words model essay 3

As we all know, Mr Gorky's autobiographical trilogy is famous all over the world, among which Childhood is a masterpiece. I just finished reading it some time ago, and I was deeply touched. The full text highly summarizes Mr Gorky's childhood life. During the reign of the czar, a poor child, Misa, lost his father, then his mother, the only relative? Grandfather is also down and out, but he still has a thirst for knowledge. His bumpy and miserable life is touching!

After reading the last sentence, I put down my book and felt so complicated. Why is a poor child's childhood so sad? Why is his childhood full of hatred and indignation without a trace of laughter? Is Soviet society really that dark? However, I know that all this is the evil result of the dark political struggle in capitalist society! This is a law of the jungle society, a dark society, a society where the lowest working people in the country can never turn over! This is Mr. Gorky's criticism, and this is a wonderful writing of the article! A society that is dark enough to make people worse must not make us feel afraid, let alone let us feel that the bright socialist system makes us live so happily. She is a symbol of justice and peace. She is the rising sun, which illuminates the land of China and warms people's frozen hearts for a long time, so that we can realize the hard-won happiness. Do you want to study hard and cherish it?

Childhood is the first autobiographical trilogy by Gorky, a Russian writer, and is regarded as one of the best autobiographical novels in Russia. Written in 193 1, Childhood shows readers Gorky's childhood life in his grandfather's house and records Gorky's mental journey under the czar. Several characters have been successfully portrayed in the book, especially the role of grandma. What's her name? One of the most vivid and poetic images in Russian literary history? . True description of the novel19th century 70? The face of Russian society in the 1990s showed a suffocating life full of cruelty, barbarism, ignorance and filth. Only by reading Childhood can we truly understand the corruption and ugliness of the czar's autocratic system, the people's servility and numbness in the dark, and the suffering of the younger generation in resisting darkness and slavery and pursuing freedom and light.

The protagonist Aletha's painful childhood moved me: at the age of four, he lost his father, followed his grief-stricken mother and kind grandmother to his overbearing and bankrupt grandfather's house, but he was often beaten by his violent grandfather. But the kind grandmother protects him everywhere. At his grandfather's house, he knows a lot? Quiet? Relatives, including two selfish, greedy and desperate uncles Mikhail and Yakov, and two cousins named Sarah. Simple and deeply in love with alessa? Otsuka? Ivan always blocks my grandfather's whip on Alisha with his arm, even if it is red and swollen. But he was very strong, and later he was crushed to death while helping my second uncle Yakov carry the cross.

Aletha spent his childhood in a typical Russian citizen's family: greedy, cruel and ignorant; The intrigue between father and son, brother and husband and wife; Often quarrel and fight over trifles of property? But in this dark family, there is a hardworking, strong and kind grandmother. She often tells Alisha beautiful fairy tales and subtly teaches him to be a person who doesn't want to bend his knees to ugliness.

Alisha's childhood was dark, just like his family. There are so many cruel things around him that sometimes even he himself can't believe that such things will happen. But fortunately, there is a grandmother? The spiritual pillar of the whole family. Aletha also knows many other people: several tenants after moving into the new house, the third young master next door, and so on. Alisha from his family? Strange? Understand something in ignorant behavior.

Compared with alessa, our childhood is brilliant and colorful; No worries and pains, no worries. Many children don't even know what this means. Fight? Because we have never experienced the feeling of being beaten or whipped. That may be unimaginable pain. Of course, in addition, there are few greedy and vicious things in our lives, such as family members fighting for property. There will be no cruel torture of an innocent person to death for no reason, will there? Terrorist incident? .

God, by contrast, our childhood is very different from Aletha's. We live in honeypots, soak in sweet water and pile up money pots every day? How happy we are! We never have to think about food, clothing, housing and transportation. These are enough for adults to worry about, not for us.

But with these, we are not satisfied. We always expect more. Because, in our eyes, it is so easy for adults to make money, and it seems like a breeze. How naive we are. Indeed, we don't have to be eleven like Alisha? Humans? Wandering alone but after reading Childhood, we should repent of our extravagance, stop wasting and learn to cherish it.

There was a passage in my childhood that I liked. Is it about a chemist? Good thing? Obviously, the young hero made friends with a strange man before he was fully absorbed by the old culture. This will definitely make Amisha's grandfather beat him up again. This is only because in the society at that time, not serving the czar was doing nothing and was evil. I believe this will make many people laugh, but it is more about thinking. Was the social truth at that time so unacceptable? Maybe there are too many such things. To this end, many scientists gave their lives, but the wise Mr. Gorky showed joy and regret for his short friendship. This also made me know that the existence of darkness is based on people's innocence and ignorance, and whether people should take the initiative to learn, knowing that knowledgeable people are smart people, and only such people can safeguard justice and truth!

Childhood is a good book and a novel that reveals the truth. I want to write about my own childhood. Even if I can't, I will cherish this book forever, because its wonderful writing technique, simple language and profound implication are all worth cherishing!