How to treat Ctrip's Yunnan tour project and prohibit Henan and Guangdong journalists from participating in the delegation?

The chaos in the tourism industry is frequently reviled; Travel companies try their best to be rational.

In recent years, the state has vigorously advocated "tourism stimulates domestic demand" and vigorously developed the political tourism industry. Even the tourist groups in the capital Beijing have been decorated in several places. Especially in places where jade articles are bought, especially in places where people cheat. However, I still saw the so-called "jade shop" where I sat on the news broadcast, and it was already the rhythm of being "robbed" in minutes. Probably many people who have traveled to Beijing will definitely regret seeing this store, but I didn't buy it ~

Not only Beijing, Shangri-La and Yunnan are full of shady trips. With the constant media reports and escalating public anger, naturally, countries should also pay close attention to relaxing the muscles of tourism. In the past 20 16, more than 5A and 4A scenic spots were ordered to rectify and delist. It can be said that the tourism industry is jittery. Naturally, we should pay special attention to those tourist attractions where "incidents" have occurred, and we should adopt an attitude of rejecting all journalists and tourists who complain.

In ancient times, there was a saying that "it is better to keep the people's mouth than to keep Sichuan". The power of public opinion is even greater than the flood, and it is normal for natural tourism companies to be afraid. But the more you are afraid of it, the more it likes to come to you. Besides, in an era when the news media is so developed, some things can keep pace with the sky. Our reporter did not find Ctrip. The explanation given by Ctrip is that this project is a clause before the tour group goes online. That means it's none of Ctrip's business, but Ctrip, as a huge travel website, must set an example. The response is nothing more than ambiguous words such as "corresponding punishment" and "post-supervision".

The problem kicked the head of the travel company, and the person in charge explained that it was quite intriguing: "Some journalists are not here to travel, but to find trouble." This is true. As long as the reporter is wronged and unhappy during the trip, the travel company will not die. It is well-founded to guard against journalists, but "discrimination" in some fields is really unacceptable. With so much hatred, is this business still going on?

Anyway, although the tourism industry is chaotic, it will continue. Whether to prohibit tourists and journalists from hiding or to standardize their own company's regulations depends on whether the travel company is forward-looking!