The incident of Li Xiang renting a house alarmed the Sanya Tourism Bureau. What happened in the end?

The Li Xiang live broadcast team in Sanya created a lot of noise on the Internet. The house was rented for 7 days. After Li Xiang's live broadcast in Sanya, the landlord complained that when he checked out, the house was in a mess and garbage was strewn all over the floor. As a result, Li Xiang said that he had cleaned the room when he left, and both parties insisted on their own opinions, which aroused public opinion on the Internet. As for this matter, the person who knows the most is naturally Li Xiang, who is involved and who is the landlord. There must be only one reason, and it is just a simple question of "should the room be cleaned when checking out?" As a result, the two parties argued endlessly, occupying public Internet resources for several days, which aroused social concern. Regarding this kind of bad social news, after several days of debate between the two parties, there is still no final conclusion. This also shows that one of the two parties involved in the case must have lied.

Since both sides held their own opinions, they argued for several days without a definite result. As a third party, the Sanya Tourism Bureau finally took the initiative to investigate the matter. Some people may ask: Why did the Sanya Tourism Bureau alert the Sanya Tourism Bureau and deal with this dispute between Li Xiang and the poster? Maybe it's mainly because the houses involved are all in Sanya. Li Xiang's stay in Sanya this time helped Sanya to some extent. 1. If Li Xiang asked someone to clean the room before leaving, it means that the landlord was involved in framing Li Xiang. Now that public opinion has fermented, the landlord should also be held responsible for his own false accusations.

If the poster made a mistake and was labeled "Sanya" because of the incident, it means that the poster's behavior has greatly affected the image of Sanya as a tourist city. At this time, the Sanya Tourism Bureau had to investigate the matter, and both parties involved were fair and public opinion got the truth, so it seems that the civil dispute will not alarm the Sanya Tourism Bureau, because Li Xiang, as a public figure, caused the The Sanya Tourism Bureau had to investigate. 2. If Li Xiang left without cleaning the room, it means that Li Xiang's behavior was actually damaging Sanya's image in the eyes of the public.

From a moral point of view, Li Xiang’s house is rented in Sanya and he should take good care of the landlord’s room as much as possible. If Li Xiang had not investigated clearly, perhaps any future visitor would rent a house here in Sanya, and instead of cleaning the room when leaving, they would return a room full of garbage to the landlord. Maybe future visitors will use Li Xiang as an argument, and there will be examples to help. So no matter what the final truth investigation reveals, this time the Sanya Tourism Bureau will return the truth to public opinion.

If the poster spreads false information, he will be punished before the final investigation results. If things go as the landlord said, Li Xiang will definitely pay the price for not cleaning the room. Although the matter of cleaning the room when checking out was a small matter, the huge public opinion caused by it has made the truth of this matter must be disclosed. According to the reply received after the reporter called the Sanya Tourism Bureau, the Sanya Tourism Bureau stated here: This incident is under investigation, and the final investigation results will be released in the form of an announcement.

In other words, in the face of the final truth, the Sanya Tourism Bureau, under such huge public opinion: even civilians will not ignore their legitimate rights and interests; even celebrities will not let her from Wrong leads to right.