What do you think of the tiger biting the injured and suing the garden, saying that its "traveling on the road" project is illegal?

Again? Why is this kind of news endless? The news broke again. Although the garden told us in another way, it would be called shameless by the people anyway and asked for more money, right?

In the incident, Ms. Zhao lost her mother, health and appearance, but it seems that these are not enough to punish her for getting off the bus at that moment. She became a mistress in some news, her family became a doctor, and she was a grumpy bitch. Her household registration information leaked out, and nude photos and bloody photos of her lying on the operating table spread everywhere. With the exposure of new news again and again, her family seems to be public enemies.

In fact, this is not the first time that a tiger in China Wildlife Park jumped on a passer-by. According to public statistics, tigers in China Wildlife Park have been killed by self-driving tourists for three times. Just last year. That is to say, on the afternoon of August 12, 2065438, a female tourist got off the bus while playing in Baihu Park of Qinhuangdao Wildlife Park and was attacked and injured by a tiger. After being taken to the hospital, he died after being rescued. The first tiger wounding incident occurred on 20 12, 10127 October. Also in the Northeast Tiger Park of Badaling Wildlife Park, an old man was in urgent need of urinating, and then he was bitten by a tiger and was seriously injured.

The first two tiger wounding and killing incidents did not get hot news, but this time, Ms. Zhao's family, who suffered a tragedy of one death and one injury, almost attracted the attention of the whole people. After media reports and comments from netizens, it gradually evolved into a dog's bloody farce, and their family almost became a public enemy of the whole people.

In fact, there are many places worth pondering, such as why the first two tiger wounding incidents didn't get hot news? Why does every move of Teacher Zhao's family become the last news after one death and one injury? Everyone knows that people who eat melons pay attention to the news for a short time. A hot news, after a period of time, will be forgotten and ignored, but the Badaling tiger wounding incident has emerged again and again, appearing in front of us again and again. Is there any driving force behind this?

In this news, Ms. Zhao, who was injured in Badaling Zoo, said that the "traveling on the road" project in the beast area provided by Badaling Wildlife World was illegal, and the design of the project itself was very flawed, which was the root cause of the plaintiff's serious injury and the main cause of her mother's death. The zoo only pays attention to commercial interests, ignores the personal and property safety of tourists, seriously lacks the awareness of safety risk prevention, and the tourist safety guarantee system is extremely lacking, and there is no emergency plan, which is the direct reason why the plaintiff was seriously injured by the tiger and his mother died.

Whether her statement is correct or not, enough people have condemned her, but is Badaling Zoo really innocent? Let's look at the data. According to public information, there have been only two animal bites and self-driving tourists bites in wildlife parks. However, shortly after the tiger bite in 15 Qinhuangdao Wildlife Park, the power grid was installed in the beast area of Qinhuangdao Wildlife Park, and tourists could no longer get in touch with beasts at zero distance. But if you look at the Badaling Zoo now, the tiger that hurt people has been released, but no safety measures have been installed in the park because of this.

20 12, the same old man was bitten by a tiger in Badaling, and there was no media report. Half a year later, some media reported that the case of the bitten old man suing Badaling Wildlife Park for poor security was opened. The matter was made public, but few people knew the news.

It's not the first time that tigers hurt people in Badaling Wildlife Park. Why didn't the park learn its lesson? Is it really appropriate for netizens to blindly accuse Zhao Nvshi of classifying wildlife parks as a weak side? Although Zhao Nvshi frequently sues zoos, the amount of compensation is not low, but if it can help Badaling Wildlife Park learn a lesson and improve its own safety measures, why not? What's your attitude towards those who say that her claim is too high? After all, if you really want to say it, it's not your money. How many netizens eat melons, do you think the amount of compensation for jealousy is spit out?

Let's be more tolerant and less malicious.