How do you evaluate the sentence "If a man has money, he will travel"?

If you have money, of course you can also travel. This is a man's happiness.

As a woman, having a stable job of her own gives her the confidence not to reach out for money, her husband is considerate, her children are filial, her family is harmonious, and she is young and beautiful. This is a woman's happiness; Each type of people has their own sense of happiness, but I think this sense of happiness is not connected. Just like Mr. Lu Xun said: Human beings' joys and sorrows are not connected. I only think they are noisy. People nowadays like to judge others from the moral high ground.

However, human beings cannot emotionally empathize with each other, because if this sentence itself is understood in today's society, it will be interpreted as follows:

1. Most of the time we don’t care about the feelings of strangers at all, because this society makes everyone feel tired. Even if we want to care, we may be misunderstood as caring with other colors;

2. When we care about others, we don’t actually understand how things develop. We just try to understand from our own perspective. This is undoubtedly creating a false intimacy and trying to bring each other closer in this way. Relationship;

3. If you connect everything with yourself, the weight you feel in your heart is indescribable.

We all know that during the epidemic, the tourism industry was an industry that was particularly hard-hit. The "trauma" of this industry, which we can all see and easily understand, is the sharp drop in demand.

Take flights as an example. OAG, an international travel data provider, has made statistics. Entering May, the number of global flights has dropped by about 70% compared to last year. In the United States and Europe, where the epidemic is more severe, the number of flights in May fell by nearly 85% year-on-year.

London's Heathrow Airport, for example, handled a total of 6.8 million passengers in April last year, but only 200,000 in April this year; and the transportation security department in the United States handled 6.8 million passengers in April last year. 70 million, only 3.2 million this year.

Compared to Europe and the United States, the situation in China is certainly much better, but judging from the data, the recovery process is still long. According to OAG statistics, as of May, the number of flights in China is still 30% lower than last year.

However, if we only look at the drop in demand, we cannot fully understand the impact of this incident on the tourism industry. The tourism industry is a very special industry. What is special about it is that the business model of this industry determines that it is an industry with relatively weak ability to withstand pressure.

The sharp drop in demand is a traumatic injury to the tourism industry; the vulnerability of the tourism industry itself is also causing "internal injuries".

Let’s take the aviation industry as an example. If you don’t understand this industry, you may think that this industry is very wealthy. After all, a plane ride is so expensive, and there are various paid services on the plane.

But this is not the case at all. The aviation industry is an industry of "small profits but quick turnover". How thin are the profits?

The "Wall Street Journal" did an analysis, saying that if a flight has 100 seats abroad, how much profit will it make? The profit is only the money earned from 1 seat.

The remaining 99 seats cover various costs. For example, 29 seats are required to cover fuel costs, 20 seats are required for personnel salaries, and 14 seats are required for government taxes and fees. , maintenance costs require 11 seats, etc.

Anyway, if you calculate it this way, a flight of 100 people must have an attendance rate of 99% to make money.

Of course, on average it is not that exaggerated. Generally speaking, for foreign airlines, it is possible to make money only when the occupancy rate reaches 2/3.

What is the situation in our country like? I saw an analysis on the public account "Blue Wings Talk" that said that a domestic flight can earn one or two Starbucks cups from each passenger.

If you take the profits of the three major domestic airlines and divide them by the number of passengers transported, you will find that Air China earns an average of 63 yuan for transporting one passenger; China Eastern Airlines earns 27 yuan; China Southern Airlines earns 20 yuan, and The performance of these three major airlines is already very good.

Of course, this calculation method is rough, but through this account, we can intuitively understand why the tourism industry is not strong in resisting attacks.