Does the "earthquake cloud" really have a scientific basis?

In fact, "earthquake cloud" has no such term in science, but it is spread by many people in daily life. So what is going on? Its misinformation is generally that before an earthquake occurs, many people mistake a natural phenomenon for an earthquake cloud. Therefore, to be precise, earthquake cloud is a meteorological term, but it is not entirely true, and sometimes it is not recognized. .

Under normal circumstances, earthquake clouds are also a very common phenomenon in our lives, and there are no special circumstances. As for why this happened before the earthquake, this is actually a psychological explanation.

So every time such a statement appears, there are many organizations to explain it. There are no clouds that can predict earthquakes in advance, and there is currently no precise definition. At the same time, although we say that it is explained as a normal natural phenomenon in some cases, it is not recognized by the meteorological or geological professions in some cases. It is simply a matter of "making something out of nothing".

Does earthquake cloud really have a scientific basis?

Obviously there is no need to answer this question. Everyone knows that there is no scientific basis at all, and no organization can prove it today. Including when an earthquake occurred in Jiuzhaigou, Sichuan, my country, a steady stream of "hindsight experts" emerged in WeChat Moments, claiming that the "radiation clouds", "pork rib clouds" and "fish scale clouds" that people happened to photograph could predict earthquakes. "Earthquake Cloud". So, do "earthquake clouds" really exist? It's obvious that it's just a fraud, nothing happened at all.

Later, the Meteorological Center also came to explain that there were no sufficient facts to prove the inherent correlation between earthquakes and weather, so earthquakes cannot be accurately predicted through satellite cloud images. If Yundu could predict earthquakes, it is estimated that the earth would have been "shocked" by earthquakes long ago.

We don’t know how many such clouds we have seen, so we are even more convinced that there is no scientific basis for this problem. If you see such a problem in the future, please don’t deliberately “find trouble”. We are in an era of advanced science and technology, and there are few things that are difficult to explain and explain. In addition to this, there are two types that are mistakenly thought to be related to earthquakes.

Are earthquake fish and biological anomalies related to earthquakes?

Earthquake fish is also a phenomenon that has been talked about a lot. It can be said that there are more people than earthquake clouds. Earthquake fish are often spread most in Japan, but earthquake fish are just normal creatures. In recent years, in order to prove the relationship between earthquake fish and pre-earthquakes, Japanese experts have used rigorous data comparison and analysis to find that earthquake fish have nothing to do with earthquakes at all. Their activities are normal and they are occasionally caught or discovered. None of it has been linked to earthquakes, so the issue was directly confirmed.

As for biological anomalies, this understanding is even simpler. The "shock" of biological creatures can be seen on the earth. Most of the time they are brought about by changes in the environment and are not related to earthquakes. In fact, everyone can do this experiment. For example, chickens, if you give them an action at a certain time, they will not mess up. What does this have to do with earthquakes? It is obviously irrelevant. Therefore, earthquake fish and earthquake clouds can clearly say It has nothing to do with earthquakes, don’t misunderstand me.

Taken together, earthquake clouds, earthquake fish, biological anomalies, etc. are not directly related to earthquakes. At least they cannot be explained at present, and they are not even recognized by any scientific classification. To be precise, there is currently no way for the scientific community to make any earthquake predictions.

Are earthquakes really unpredictable?

As we said above, earthquakes cannot be accurately predicted today. First of all, we know that the principle of earthquakes is mainly caused by plate movement or fault zone sliding, which are all active.

On a global scale, earthquakes of different sizes occur almost every day, and most of them are caused by plate movement or fault zone slipping. If humans can master the earthquakes beneath each plate, In which direction it will move in one second, it is basically possible to accurately predict earthquakes, but this problem is obviously not valid. Who knows what will happen in the future?

So this is one of the difficulties in accurately predicting earthquakes. Perhaps earthquake predictions will never be possible, including the fact that the United States and Japan often talk about the probability of earthquakes in a certain area. This is also a possibility. The explanation has no authentic and deterministic basis. Under such circumstances, of course, humans cannot relax in their defense against earthquakes. Although earthquakes cannot be accurately predicted, earthquake early warning mechanisms are established after earthquakes occur to slow down the impact of earthquakes.

Earthquake early warning is based on the propagation speed of seismic waves, using artificial technology to provide early warning. When the seismic waves propagate to the earthquake affected area, an early warning time is given. Its effectiveness can also be seen. In most cases nowadays Below are warning times of tens of seconds in advance. In the future, mankind will fully realize second-level early warning, and the impact on mankind will be lower. We will wait and see.