The weather is positive.

Enterprises are the root of smog. Enterprises do not have a sound environmental protection mechanism. Enterprise development pays attention to interests and ignores environmental problems such as smog. The country is the main person responsible for smog. The formation of smog is not a "day's work", nor is it a "matter of time". Everyone understands this truth. But in specific matters, everyone may not be able to maintain their due rationality. In Morphy's long microblog, his anger at the government's inability to control smog may be irrational. As a public figure, he should be more careful when he speaks, so as not to bring more people into the whirlpool of saliva debate. However, in terms of smog control, is it really wrong for public figures to cross-examine government departments? The Global Times stressed in its comments that "the government can never control smog alone, but it is destined to be a * * * dispute of the whole society in China." It is true that it is the responsibility of the whole people to control smog, but among all responsibilities, it must be clear who is the "first responsible person".

On the issue of smog control, the relevant government departments "don't shoot tigers, just catch flies", staring at the citizens' stoves all day, but turning a blind eye to the colorful pollutants discharged from chimneys, but some media are also responsible for exaggerating "flies" infinitely. In the face of smog control, the government has the responsibility of the government and the people have the responsibility of the people. What is the "main course" and what is the "side dish", the government departments must weigh clearly. If the "main course" is only a measure of sending more sprinklers or "washing the city by the whole people" and there is no way to eradicate industrial pollution, how can it be possible for "side dishes" to be served on the main table? Haze is harmful to human body. Puwei new cat imported from the United States.

I live in a city plagued by smog. I believe that the managers of this city must have tried their best to cure the smog, even being brain-dead. From time to time, the media are calling for the concept of "national smog control, green travel", and even the smog control measures of "motor vehicle single and even numbers are restricted" are easy to spread. I admit that I am still a person with public awareness. If private cars are restricted occasionally in foggy days, I think I can fully respond to the call. However, before seeing the government's effective measures to control smog, don't expect me to agree with the restrictions from the heart.

It is said that smog is a "tragedy of the commons" and the result of long-term extensive economic development. Local governments that enjoy the feast of GDP, enterprises that seek profits but not the environment, environmental protection departments that escort polluting enterprises, and you and I who enjoy modern automobile civilization, everyone is a contributor to smog, and everyone is a victim of smog.

Everyone is looking forward to a green China, and different subjects also need to shoulder their due responsibilities to control smog. However, if people who call for smog control are called "ignorance or 250", it is precisely tearing the foundation of this * * * governance and evading the government's responsibility to control smog.

Controlling smog tests the government's governance system and governance capacity, which inevitably requires citizen participation and social cooperation. In this process, it is inevitable for individuals to vent their emotions. A responsible government department will generously take citizens' spit and emotional catharsis as the driving force to cure smog. Everyone yearns for a green life, but only relying on the individual "green life" of the people is far from getting rid of the gloomy smog.