Write a composition in the debate

1. Write a debate composition (more than 400 words) and remember a heated and interesting debate.

The ancients often said that it is beneficial to open books. However, with the continuous passage of time and the rapid development and progress of social civilization, gradually, a series of unhealthy books such as pornography and violence began to appear in the society, which not only seriously affected our study, but also made great changes in our hearts, from pure and beautiful hearts.

Into a sinful heart full of sin. So there is a saying that opening books may not be beneficial. In order to let us know this problem more clearly, Ceng Laoshi organized a heated and interesting debate!

"Now, the debate officially begins! Please ask those in favor first: Yi Bangja, Liu Chang, Ouyang Keren and Cao Yiqing. " Ceng Laoshi's words just say that finish, I saw Yi Bangja and they took to the stage with a pistol, his hands on his waist, as if to dominate the ring! "Now please the opposing side:, Chang, Chang, Liu Jinshi, Chen Yongda." We also disdain to step onto the stage and stare at Yi Bangja and them with angry eyes! Yi Bangja and others also looked at us with contempt!

And the result? "Now, please ask the positive representative to state his point of view first-it is beneficial to open the book." As soon as Ceng Laoshi finished speaking, Yi Bangja stepped forward and smiled coldly at us, as if to say, "Wait and see!" Then he said loudly to the whole class: "Classmates, books have been the nourishment of human beings and the ladder of human progress since ancient times. Lin, the author of Stealing Books, wrote in Stealing Books: You grew up eating and reading! In the conversation between Vivi and Dashu, he also wrote: The most reliable way to write a good article is to read more books. ..... all kinds of open-book evidence appeared before our eyes, so we thought-open-book is beneficial! " Yi Bangja's heroic ending, the audience applauded! Since you gave us a duel, of course we can't give up! "Now, please ask the representative of the opposing party to state his point of view-it may not be beneficial to open the book." After Ceng Laoshi finished speaking, I saw Yang Xuan unhurriedly step forward and loudly say to the whole class: "Dear classmates, as we all know, there are pornographic and violent books in the society, which have seriously affected our physical and mental health and study, so we think it is not necessarily beneficial to oppose-open books!" "Well, both sides have finished their statements, and now enter the free debate. Please ask questions first. " Yi Bangja jumped to his feet and said to us, "Books have their own golden houses, books have their own Yan Ruyu, books are the ladder of human progress, and so on. Everyone knows from ancient times to the present! Hearing this, Liu Jinshi was fascinated and loudly said to Yi Bangja, "From ancient times to the present? In ancient times, there were outlaws of the Marsh. What are the Dragon Ball and Doraemon today? Is this beneficial? ! So I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books! " "Then can't you see?" Yi Bangja asked loudly. I can't hold my breath. I stepped forward and said loudly, "we are still teenagers, so our determination is not strong!" " " ……

Finally, we won by a narrow margin! And we finally understand that reading should be selective and not blind!

Extended reading article

Composition is the "half of the country" that determines the score of Chinese exam, so the success or failure of composition often determines the success or failure of the whole Chinese exam. So how do you get high marks in the exam composition? I think the following points must be noted.

Life 1, questions and intentions Every exam composition must be examined, because candidates should compete fairly in the same environment. Examining the topic is to read and understand all the contents shown in the topic comprehensively and accurately, read out the intention of the proposer, clarify the limitations of examining the topic, and clarify what I should write, how to write it, and to what extent, so as to truly understand it comprehensively, grasp it profoundly, and write a composition without bias or omission. The composition marking of the college entrance examination clearly stipulates that the final score of any problematic paper in the exam generally does not exceed the lowest score of the second type of paper. It can be seen that the accuracy of the exam is the key factor in the success or failure of the composition. The idea is to ask the author to observe, understand and refine the theme from the height of the times, so that the theme can reflect the spirit of the times, reflect the times, act on the times, beat the pulse of the times and promote the progress of the times. The meaning of the article is actually that the author is experiencing.

An idea that gradually breeds in life is that the author's subjective understanding collides with the objective reality.

2. Debate, 400-word composition debate

Dear teachers and students:

Hello everyone!

Lies are not good, but today, we have added an attribute in front-kindness. Then, his essence changed fundamentally. "There is not a saying that a white lie is beautiful. When we tell some little lies for the happiness and hope of others, lies become understanding, respect and tolerance, which has magical power.

For example, if a terminally ill patient is sentenced to death by a doctor, his parents, lover, children and all relatives will not directly tell him that "your life is hopeless", and you will not live long. Although all this is true, who will tell the truth to their already miserable relatives as cruelly as a judge sentenced a prisoner to death? At this time, everyone will form a United front, keep silent about the truth, and use white lies to make patients full of hope for treatment and let patients spend the rest of their lives with peace of mind. Right? If you were the patient's family, would you tell him the truth?

White lies have magical power, encouraging you to make progress again and again, and never giving up for your dreams. Because the future road is completely illuminated by happy mood, life becomes better.

If confession is a mistake, I choose lies.

If telling the truth, being frank and being reckless is a kind of harm, I choose lies.

If it's for yourself or others to stop suffering and sadness, what's the harm of a little more lies?

3. Write a composition on the topic of "Remember an argument". People often say, "Open books are beneficial." However, some people say, "opening a book may not be beneficial." So, today we have a special debate, is it beneficial to open books? The positive view holds that opening books is beneficial, while the negative view holds that opening books is not necessarily beneficial. I am the opponent's debater.

At the beginning of the debate, xu teacher said pre-emptively, "I think it is beneficial to open books. We go to school every day and read extracurricular books every day. Don't we all come to school to accept knowledge because we think it is beneficial to open books? "

Old Xu's words didn't stop us from opposing the Party. I said calmly and freely, "there are two kinds of books, useful and useless." All the books we read at school are good for our body and mind, but some books outside are not good for us. Do you read too? Someone once said that a bad book is like a demon, which will defile the pure fertile soil of your mind. As soon as I spoke, our applause broke out.

"In ancient times, there were people like E799Be5BaA6E59B9EE7Ad9431333264653436.' There is a golden house in the book, and there is a Yan Ruyu in the book'. These books are all treasures. Why is it useless to say books? " Xiao Zhao is not to be outdone.

At this time, the opposing party was silent. Fortunately, all the smart people helped in time. She said: "Ancient is ancient, and modern is modern. How can this be compared? There are so many pornographic books and periodicals on the market now, what should we do if we read the imitation? "

While we were arguing, the teacher became a peacemaker. She said: "It is certainly beneficial to open books, but you should read selectively, otherwise it will be harmful to yourself."

Through this debate, we not only exercised our eloquence, but also learned to treat everything in two ways. This debate can be described as fruitful.

4. Remember a wonderful 400-word debate composition. Today, our class held a debate. The themes of this debate are "opening books is beneficial" and "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". People who think that "opening books is beneficial" are positive; It is the opponent who thinks that "opening books may not be beneficial"

At the beginning of the debate, Sharla Cheung said positively and confidently, "I agree that it is beneficial to open books, because those writers are not born writers, so they can write good compositions. It's that after reading a lot of books, they learn a lot of writing methods before they can write a good composition and eventually become writers. My speech is over. " Not to be outdone, rival Zhang Yiran retorted, "I agree that it is beneficial to open books. There is a saying that reading a good book is talking to a noble person. " You must read a "good book" to write a good composition. If you read pornographic books such as comic books or ghost stories, your writing level will not improve, but will continue to decline. That's all. "The audience immediately there was a deafening applause. All the other contestants have their own opinions. In the end, the positive side was persuaded by the negative side.

From this debate, I understand a truth: we should read books that are beneficial to our study. Draw good words and sentences in the process of reading and use them properly in your own composition, and you can write ingenious articles.

This is really an unforgettable debate!

Note: Some names were changed by myself.

On Friday, Teacher Su took us to have a debate. According to the content of oral communication, the teacher divided us into one or two groups, and the view was that "opening books is beneficial", while the other three or four groups were opposite to us.

Before class, Teacher Su asked each side to send one person to choose a debater. He Qiu. Against: Lan Han Qi. Liao Honglin. Liu Xuan. Wu Fuxiang. We were so nervous that we took out our own materials to browse. The debate began. First of all, we introduced ourselves. Because I am too nervous, I call the "three arguments for the positive" the "three arguments against the negative". As a result, the class suddenly exploded, and some people in our 1 group and group 2 even called me a traitor. Next, our No.1 debater He began to speak: "Knowledge is the only way for human progress and civilization. Books are the crystallization of predecessors' labor and wisdom and the source of our knowledge. " But the other side is not to be outdone: "Reading is not necessarily good, and many primary school students are addicted to martial arts novels, which leads to a decline in learning." "No, I don't think so!" Qiu stood up and shouted: "As the saying goes,' a scholar knows what's going on in the world without going out' and' strategizing and winning a thousand miles'. Reading more books can let you know the origin of what is happening in the world. " This made the other side speechless, and the other side's second debate seemed to be frightened by Qiu's "loud voice". He made a little defense and sat down. I make persistent efforts: "Opening books is beneficial, and reading is beneficial. This is what people have known since ancient times. If a person wants to climb the mountain of knowledge, the higher the scenery, the more magnificent it is, and he must have profound knowledge. " After that, I threw a winning smile at each other. Next, we will enter the free debate session, and everyone will hold a word. Teacher Su interrupted everyone and summed up the debate: "Good books are like treasure boxes, and bad books are like robbers! "

Finally, the teacher announced the winner of this debate-Zheng Fang, we are so happy!

Since the 20th century, great changes have taken place in science and technology, which have improved our lives. Now every household uses high-tech products. However, while enjoying high-tech life, human beings ignore the advantages and disadvantages brought by high-tech products.

Just like the batteries we use every day. In the past, when there was no battery, electricity could not be carried around, which brought inconvenience to our lives more or less. With the safety battery, electricity can be carried around, which has brought great help to our lives. However, if the waste batteries are discarded into nature without treatment, it will do great harm to nature. For example, a grain of button cell can pollute 600,000 liters of water, which is equivalent to the amount of water a person drinks in his life. A piece of rotten battery in the field can make a square meter of land useless, so it is not an exaggeration to say that a piece of waste battery is a "pollution bomb".

For example, the plastic bags we use every day. In the past, when there was no plastic belt, people could only pack vegetables in baskets, which was very troublesome and inconvenient. Since the appearance of plastic bags, it is much more convenient for people to buy food and things-just use plastic bags. However, when people use plastic bags, have they ever thought about its harm? Yes, degradable plastic bags are specially treated and will not cause harm to the environment. What about non-degradable plastic bags? According to the data, non-degradable garbage bags will do great harm to land and air after being buried and burned. Moreover, when recycling waste plastics, it is difficult to classify and it is not economical. Plastics are easy to burn, which will produce toxic gases and do great harm to the environment. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to call plastic bags "white pollution".

In addition, it has now entered the computers of thousands of households. Computers are very useful, such as looking up information, chatting and drawing ... but computers also radiate a lot. You know, radiation is harmful to human body. If your eyes don't rest on the computer screen for a long time, your eyes may be nearsighted. Think about how inconvenient it is for a person to do things with a pair of eyes.

Let's talk about satellites. Satellites have made great contributions: they can forecast the weather and carry out global positioning ... but if these satellites "run out of life", they will become space junk. Space junk will run amok in space, just like drivers who don't obey traffic rules on the road-stop others from driving. The rampage of these space junk will destroy the orbit of other spacecraft, cause these spacecraft to get out of orbit, and make the spacecraft carefully developed by scientists disappear without a trace. Although there are also space instruments to clean up space junk, after all, the cost is high and only one space junk can be eliminated.

High-tech has brought convenience to our life, but we can't ignore its shortcomings. I hope that in the 2 1 century, high-tech undertakings can consider our lives in many ways. Here, I wish the high-tech industry can come to by going up one flight of stairs!

References:

/blog /cns! 275EA729A859435E！ Entrance?

6. The debate composition in our class is more than 400 words. The name of the argument is whether it is beneficial to open books. The debate is divided into two factions, one is affirmative and the other is negative. The positive view is that opening books is beneficial, while the negative view is that opening books is not necessarily beneficial.

A wonderful debate began, and we kicked off. The teacher asked Zheng Xian to speak; He said that we think reading can make us make up our minds and arouse patriotism, so I think it is beneficial to open books. Zheng's voice just fell, and the students opposite us were unconvinced. Chen immediately raised his hand and said, "Mr. Lu Xun once said that reading a dead book is harmful to himself, and it will harm others as soon as it is opened, but it is not necessarily good not to read, and it is not necessarily beneficial to open it." "

Not to be outdone, Liu Yijun said: Books are the ladder of human progress. Eating without meat is better than living without bamboo, so it is beneficial to open books. "The opposing Tang Le stood up with confidence and plausibly said that reading martial arts novels and romance novels would be possessed for a long time, and his grades would plummet, and he would even embark on the road of crime, so opening books may not be beneficial. Thunderous applause broke out in the classroom. However, the other party was silent. It took a long time for someone to say that books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools.

7. Six-year-old Unit 3 Debate Composition 400 words "Ding" accompanied by sweet * *, the teacher came into the classroom with a big smile and said solemnly, "Today we are going to hold a debate, the content is' Should parents care about us?' "The pros and cons sit aside, and as a result, most people yearn for freedom.

Look at the positive number. Very few. However, they seem confident and want to put on a good show of "winning more with less". At the beginning of the debate, the positive side first put forward the view: "From the point of view of a primary school student, I think parents should control us. Only in this way can we develop in the right direction, otherwise we will go astray! " That strong tone made the opposing party play an extremely strong spirit, and immediately retorted in a stronger tone: "I object to your opinion, parents should not care too much about us!" " "Say that finish, he cited another real case.

I think this case is very convincing, but the positive side captures the pain of the opposing side: "Our view is that parents should take care of us, not parents should take care of us too much." This rebuttal made the other party suddenly speechless, and the positive side took the lead with a strong advantage.

The opponent pondered for a while, and finally someone stood up and said, "Although we are primary school students, we also know how to control ourselves, so we don't need adults to control us." This rebuttal makes the advantage of the square plummet.

Seeing that the battle was about to fail, Zheng Fang was as anxious as a cat on hot bricks, busy looking for information. At this time, a classmate stood up and said mercilessly, "In that case, why are there always students addicted to surfing the Internet and playing games?" The other party was speechless.

Zheng Fang used to be "no doubt there is no road", but later it became "another village". The students were angry and angry, and the atmosphere was very warm.

The debate finally ended, and the one in favor won. The teacher taught us: "From a dialectical point of view, a pupil must be controlled by his parents. Only in this way can he guide you in the right direction; " However, the control should not be excessive. It is necessary to ensure that the physical and mental health of primary school students is within an appropriate range, and there should be room for free development and personality cultivation.

Students, on the other hand, should gradually cultivate their self-control ability, so that parents can rest assured and pay less attention to it. ""Ding-"ear and there was a sweet * * *.

After class, I recalled this wonderful debate and thought that this debate not only improved our understanding of things, but also exercised our eloquence. I am really looking forward to the next oral communication class.

8. I remember a debate composition, a white lie and an honest debate. An unforgettable debate of 450 words. During my six-year primary school career, I experienced numerous activities.

There are exciting outings, interesting knowledge quizzes, sports games with you chasing after me, and school celebrations in full swing ... Among these countless activities, there are unforgettable activities, activities that move me, and ... there is one activity that I can't forget so far, and that is the debate competition that has benefited me a lot. As soon as the bell rang in the fourth class on Wednesday, the students took out pieces of paper and put them on the desks, waiting for the arrival of Teacher Wen.

Do you know what we are doing? To tell the truth, we are going to have a debate called "Do we need white lies in life?" Those pieces of paper are the material of our debate. The debate is mainly divided into two factions: those in favor and those against. Boys are in favor and girls are against it.

The debate began. Teacher Wen "shuashuashua" wrote the words "Do you need white lies in your life" on the blackboard. Then let's start, that is, those who support "white lies are not needed in life".

"I represent the positive side. Lying is lying. If everyone uses white lies as a reason, there will be no truth in the world. " Fang Xiaoyi said.

"But lies are not necessarily cheating. There are two kinds of lies: malicious and white.

Lying is human instinct. As for whether it is honest or not, the key lies in what kind of lies it tells. Malicious lies are cheating. Malicious lies are an act of seeking benefits for liars and hurting others, with a strong desire for profit.

White lies are based on good motives and take safeguarding the interests of others as their purpose and starting point. A white lie will not hinder honesty.

So there should be white lies in life. "Distinguish to the opposite classmate.

The classroom immediately became lively, and several of our team members immediately raised their hands. A few seconds later, Mr Wen immediately asked Xiao Yi to refute.

Xiaoyi stood up and said loudly to us: "A white lie is an excuse! Gasmel said: "It is quite common to think that you are better than yourself. Most people don't live in reality, but in fantasy, especially in their own fantasy. "

However, most excuses are destructive. Shouldn't we be honest with each other and make fewer excuses? At the same time, I want to ask each other, if everyone has this view, how can our country make greater progress in integrity? Just as the students were arguing about it, Mr. Wen stopped us and concluded, "It's a draw. We are well prepared this time. We need to be honest in life and don't tell lies casually, but in some special occasions, white lies can still be said. "

This is really an unforgettable debate! Hope to adopt.

9. The composition "A Debate" 400- "Ding-"sounded crisp, and Mr. Chen strode onto the platform and said, "Today's oral communication class is about two topics:' It's beneficial to open books' (you can take books for exams) and' It's not necessarily beneficial to open books' (you can't take books for exams). The rule is: 1, debate freely. If you have any comments to add. Raise your hand and keep quiet. At this time, the students in the class were divided into the opposing faction headed by Xu and the active faction headed by Xu. The debate began. First of all, Huang Ziyin said, "I think it is beneficial to open books. Didn't people invent high-tech computers for us? As soon as Huang Ziyin finished speaking, Xu began to refute: "I am against the point of view. If we use high technology to do these things, don't we know our own strength? "Isn't the exam just to test what you have learned?" In this way, the two of them played several rounds with each other. Li Rui, the opponent, found that he could not resist Xu's serial attacks gradually, so he went forward and said, "I agree that using a laptop can make us all get 100 points." They bully more and bully less. I can't stand it: "If high-tech can do such a thing, just sit at home. Unexpectedly, my words left them speechless. At the end of the debate, Mr. Chen made a paragraph: "This debate is coming to an end, and the previous classmates spoke positively. However, in today's society, exams are divided into open books and closed books, so we should look at this problem from all aspects.

10. Writing a composition on the topic of "Remember an argument" People often say: "It is beneficial to open an book." However, some people say, "opening a book may not be beneficial." So, today we have a special debate, is it beneficial to open books? The positive view holds that opening books is beneficial, while the negative view holds that opening books is not necessarily beneficial. I am the opponent's debater.

At the beginning of the debate, xu teacher said pre-emptively, "I think it is beneficial to open books. We go to school every day and read extracurricular books every day. Don't we all come to school to accept knowledge because we think it is beneficial to open books? "

Old Xu's words didn't stop us from opposing the Party. I said calmly and freely, "there are two kinds of books, useful and useless." All the books we read at school are good for our body and mind, but some books outside are not good for us. Do you read too? Someone once said that a bad book is like a demon, which will defile the pure fertile soil of your mind. As soon as I spoke, our applause broke out.

"The ancients said,' The book has its own golden house, and the book has its own Yan Ruyu'. Books are treasures. Why is it useless to say books? " Xiao Zhao is not to be outdone.

At this time, the opposing party was silent. Fortunately, all the smart people helped in time. She said: "Ancient is ancient, and modern is modern. How can this be compared? There are so many pornographic books and periodicals on the market now, what should we do if we read the imitation? "

While we were arguing, the teacher became a peacemaker. She said: "It is certainly beneficial to open books, but you should read selectively, otherwise it will be harmful to yourself."

Through this debate, we not only exercised our eloquence, but also learned to treat everything in two ways. This debate can be described as fruitful.