Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Weather inquiry - What is the modification potential of Honda 1.0T? First-stage performance evaluation of Lingpai original factory

What is the modification potential of Honda 1.0T? First-stage performance evaluation of Lingpai original factory

Honda has been ridiculed by netizens for buying an engine to send a car. From B 16 to K20, and then to the original L 15B series in the turbine era, the motivation has always been talked about by the majority of players. But what we are going to talk about today is Honda's 65438+2..0T three-cylinder engine. According to Honda's vision, the Earth Dream Engine will launch three kinds of displacement engines, namely 65433.

L 15B turbocharged engine

K20C3 engine

Since 2008, Honda has been developing the Earth Dream series engines. After five years of research and development, Honda has successively launched L 15B series 1.5 self-priming turbine model and K20C series 2.0T turbine model. However, the triple cylinder of 1.0T has not been listed yet. Perhaps the research and development of the first two engines consumed a lot of energy of Honda. Honda entrusts 1.0T three-cylinder engine to German FEV engine factory. However, Ford's 1.0Tecoboost is also produced by this company, and it almost ran into Ford. Fortunately, Honda provided FEV with a complete set of earth dream technology, which led to today's tripartite mixture of China, Japan and Germany? Guangqi Honda Lingpai (Lingpai is a domestic car).

P 10A tri-cylinder 1.0T engine

After talking about Honda's three-cylinder engine, let's test whether this 1.0T will be awarded the title of buying an engine and delivering a car. We will compare and analyze the original factory and the first stage from the aspects of zero acceleration, on-wheel horsepower and fuel consumption.

Although it is winter now, the weather temperature in Shenzhen is still very high. In order to get a better solution, we choose to test zero acceleration at night.

The first-level acceleration is 9.3 seconds.

The best procedure for factory testing is 1 1.05438+0 seconds.

Wheel data superposition of two tests?

It can be analyzed from the figure that the maximum acceleration G value of the original factory is 0.46 g, ranging from 0 to 100 run182m, and the maximum acceleration G value of the first stage is 0.5 1 g, ranging from 0 to 100 run154.9m.. From the starting G value, it can be analyzed that the starting turbine pressure is higher than that of the original factory, and from our actual test data, it can also be analyzed that the original factory only promises to start at the maximum of 0.3bar, while the first stage is 0.5bar, and the starting speed of our ejection is 2500 rpm.

Accelerated data flow representation of zero test.

Finally, it is concluded that the first-stage disconnection time is 1.7 seconds longer than that of the original factory, and the original factory disconnection time is1.01second, and the first-stage disconnection time is 9.3 seconds.

Next, the second project, the on-wheel horsepower test, is carried out.

Quick plug-in computer installed in engine room

Because it is a CVT gearbox, there is no simulated gear, there is no way to lock the gear, and only L gear can be hung. However, the starting speed of the horsepower test is 45 km/h, so our horsepower test can only be changed from 5300 to 6 100 rpm. This situation is really helpless. In this speed range, only the maximum horsepower and torque can appear, which is of little reference significance.

The upper part is the torque curve and the lower part is the turbine pressure curve.

It can be seen from the figure that the turbine pressure is 1.7 bar even at 6000 rpm. This turbine pressure is enough to show that Honda's P 10A engine is also very strong in this displacement category.

Finally, it is concluded that there are 85 original wheels, 65,438+008 in one stage and 23 wheels. For the displacement of 1.0, this improvement is enough to prove the potential of P 10A three-cylinder engine, but in the view of refitting players, the displacement of three cylinders and 1.0 is already deceptive.

Finally, the 100 km fuel consumption test of the third project was carried out. First of all, it is the first-stage fuel consumption test, which is still the old rule. You should drive a certain number of kilometers with full fuel (urban road conditions plus high-speed road conditions), and then fill it up until you stop refueling at the first jump, and how many kilometers you can run with how many liters of fuel, so as to calculate the most real fuel consumption.

Subtotal clear, the mileage of this matter is 2572.

The subtotal will be cleared when it is filled with oil, and the air conditioner will be stably adjusted to the fourth-gear refrigeration direction to drive in full D gear.

Come on,11.45l.

From Shenzhen, take the urban road conditions to Humen Expressway to Guangzhou Huadu, and then to the gas station, and drive160.3km with an average speed of 4 1. Finally, refuel 65,438+065,438+0.45L, and finally measure the fuel consumption of 7.65,438+0400 km/L, which is 7.2, which is basically consistent with the actual fuel consumption.

We went to Guangzhou for a horsepower test, so we need to return to Shenzhen for the original fuel consumption test. It is also full of oil, subtotal is cleared, the second gear of air conditioner is stable and the fourth gear is refrigerated, and the whole process is D gear.

Until the gas station, we drove at an average speed of 49 kilometers per hour 170 kilometers (as shown in the table). Of course, this is the same way as the first step of our test. We take the expressway to Humen and then take the national highway from Humen to Shenzhen, just because it is night, and the width of urban roads is basically not congested.

Finally, refuel 10.64L, and the actual fuel consumption we measured is 6.1500km/L. Of course, we analyzed the average fuel consumption of this configuration vehicle based on the fuel consumption of Xiao Xiong, and the first-stage fuel consumption of 7. 14 is also normal.

This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.