Can traditional Chinese medicine cure atrial fibrillation? Can traditional Chinese medicine cure atrial fibrillation?

Traditional Chinese medicine can treat atrial fibrillation. I've been in therapy for many years.

My theory is different from that in the textbook. Most popular science books are copied, and mine is independent thinking. So it may look fresh, and some people may think that what I said is wrong. In fact, medicine is not about treatment, but about treatment.

Why can Chinese medicine treat atrial fibrillation?

If you study medicine, Chinese medicine and western medicine are actually westernized;

Without studying medicine, the medical knowledge accepted is basically westernized;

If you are not westernized, interested in Chinese medicine and believe in Chinese medicine, it is basically too popular and superficial, so this "why" is not easy to answer, so you have to subvert some of your original understanding.

On the whole, a few things:

Almost none of the atrial fibrillation we have observed is cured, and almost all of them are getting worse and worse. Why can it get heavier and heavier, but it can't get better and better until it is completely better?

Sudden atrial fibrillation, sometimes atrial fibrillation, sometimes no atrial fibrillation, why there is no atrial fibrillation, is a good time, since there is no treatment, no atrial fibrillation, indicating that this atrial fibrillation is reversible! Why can't we keep him getting better?

Atrial fibrillation is caused by cardiac sympathetic nerve discharge and electrical conduction disorder. Why is it disordered? What is the reason? Sudden atrial fibrillation must be sometimes chaotic and sometimes not chaotic. What's wrong with the internal organs, which leads to cardiac sympathetic nerve disorder? This messy foundation is cured before you take care of it, right?

Practice is the only criterion for testing truth!

Attention is the only thing.

No matter what Europe and America, no matter what experts and professors, no matter what Nature, Science and The Lancet (this is the most famous magazine in the world, of course, there are fakes on it), it is good people who can cure diseases, and those who can cure diseases are right. The theory is clear. Patients can listen to reason or be in fog, but they can't cure diseases. That's right.

I only have one. I have treated a lot of atrial fibrillation, and the effect is very good (I have a complete case file, many videos and many posts written by patients).

I use Chinese medicine to treat atrial fibrillation, which is actually a combination of Chinese and western medicine.

The occurrence of atrial fibrillation is definitely caused by the disorder of cardiac sympathetic nerve, which is the direct cause. No matter how the disorder is caused, it is certain that atrial fibrillation will not occur without disorder.

There must be a reason for this confusion. What is the reason? It is understandable that atrial enlargement caused by valve regurgitation in rheumatic heart disease leads to neurological disorder. Although hyperthyroidism leads to atrial fibrillation, it is far-fetched, but most atrial fibrillation has neither rheumatic heart disease nor hyperthyroidism. Why?

One thing is certain, any disease has the basis of onset, arm and leg problems will not cause atrial fibrillation, it must be visceral diseases.

There is something wrong with the internal organs, no matter the problem or the name of the disease. There is a problem anyway. The key reaction is in the heart, just reflected in the sympathetic nerve disorder, so I tremble.

Therefore, to treat atrial fibrillation, we should not only treat the disorder of cardiac sympathetic nerve, but also treat the miscellaneous internal organs, that is, treat both the symptoms and the root causes. If we simply treat the cardiac sympathetic nerve, the curative effect will not be consolidated. It turns out that you can get sick slowly without getting sick. Why can it be cured? If we only treat the five internal organs, it is too far away from the sympathetic nerve, and it is not easy to get better.

So I use "biological acupuncture+Chinese medicine" for treatment. Biological acupuncture focuses on solving the problems of cardiac sympathetic nerves and meridians of meridians and viscera. Traditional Chinese medicine focuses on solving the problems of zang-fu organs and collaterals of meridians and nerves. Each has its own emphasis. Better be together.

My biggest difference is that I have grasped the fundamental focus of the cardiac sympathetic nerve.

Ancient Chinese medicine also performed surgery and dissection, but the ancient technology was underdeveloped, at least the knives and scissors were not exquisite, and ancient Chinese medicine was restricted by customs and habits.

In the Qing Dynasty, there was a famous Chinese doctor in Yutian, Tangshan, who went to a cemetery to find an autopsy. The body rotted, so many things could not be seen. At present, the specimens used for autopsy in medical colleges are soaked in formalin immediately after death, which cannot rot, and the social environment allows. ...

In short, ancient Chinese medicine did not find nerves, but nerves are not the patent of western medicine.

Western medicine and Chinese medicine are not antagonistic. It's just that western medicine is getting thinner and narrower now, which is a little misunderstood. Standing on the mountain and looking down, it is clear how to climb and where to climb, but if you can't see the mountain in a circle, you may get lost. This is the difference between Chinese medicine and western medicine.

Radio frequency is lost. Initially, atrial fibrillation was a neurological disorder in the atrium. The radio frequency changed its pattern and tried to cut off this messy thing, but everyone was in a mess. After you cut a few scissors (three horizontal knives and three vertical knives), the rest is still in a mess. Why don't you solve it when he screws up? So the RF effect is not good.

One is that RF is still shaking after it is finished. Of course it's still messy. It's just a whole group, and the RF is cut into several groups. Then even if the earthquake stopped at that time, people were still uncomfortable, of course, because there was still a little chaos and the whole body problems were still there; Then there are premature beats and supraventricular tachycardia, which are understandable although they don't tremble. A big mess has become nine small ones, and there are many threads.

In addition, it is easy to relapse and the factors that lead to mental disorders are still there. Of course, it is easy to relapse.

Biological needle is not to cut off the nerve, not to anesthetize the nerve, not to block the nerve conduction like betaloc, but to "influence" him near the sympathetic ganglion of the heart and change the microenvironment around the sympathetic nerve.

An island is restless. You drove the aircraft carrier to the strait and stopped without firing. Is it effective? Effective.

A young man is tired and listless. Does it work for you to have a beautiful young girl standing beside him? Effective (IT company has this position).

There is a big man only half a meter away from your body in an uncrowded environment. Is it uncomfortable? Uncomfortable Therefore, there is a social etiquette to keep a distance of 1 meter from people.

That's probably why. These are all common sense. Common sense is regular and correct. People nowadays are always incurable or lack common sense. Anyway, my biological needle is effective.

Some people say that I have been treated by Chinese medicine, but I can't. ...

This is also common sense.

Isn't it common sense that there are experts, ordinary people and people who just fill in the blanks in all walks of life? There is a teapot in 20 yuan, and there are 20,000 teapots; Ginseng is hundreds of pieces per catty, with 101 thousand roots; Various sports include amateurs and world champions. This is common sense.

In addition, the quality of medicinal materials in my clinic is very good, and the curative effect of treatment is not guaranteed, but the quality of medicinal materials is OK. It's hard for you to buy very spicy Shandong green onions now. It is difficult to buy cucumber-flavored cucumbers. Almost nothing tastes the same anyway. Can you cook delicious dishes? It took a lot of effort to purchase medicinal materials, and the quality was really good.

Finally, emphasize:

It is really good for me to treat atrial fibrillation with Chinese medicine. This is an objective conclusion, which is better than the current mainstream western medicine therapy or other Chinese medicine treatments alone. But you can't cure the disease with your hands, and it's not that magical.

Specifically:

Sudden atrial fibrillation, the treatment goal is of course less fibrillation or no fibrillation, which is relatively simple;

For persistent atrial fibrillation, I have set five treatment goals:

1, not uncomfortable;

2, the heart rate is not fast;

3. The left atrium becomes smaller;

4. Reduce the chance of thrombosis;

5. Don't tremble.

This is my goal. Compared with the international practice guide, I added a "smaller left ventricle", which is more advanced. The left atrium becomes bigger, then the left ventricle becomes bigger, and finally heart failure, which is another serious consequence of atrial fibrillation. Now people are concerned about atrial fibrillation forming cerebral infarction, but the probability of atrial fibrillation causing cerebral infarction is not 100%, or only increased several times, and atrial fibrillation eventually leads to heart failure almost close to 100%.

My treatment, basically 123, is very likely, just over 90, I said stop western medicine or reduce the amount. Article 4 there is no statistical data, just the experience of daily experience in my mind, which I think is effective. We won't expand the principle here.

Fifth, it is more difficult not to tremble. Generally speaking, the older you get, the longer the duration of atrial fibrillation and the more other diseases in the whole body, so it is not easy to restore sinus rhythm. For example, a 50-year-old with persistent atrial fibrillation for just 3 months, who is not tired from work, lives comfortably and has no other diseases, greatly increases the possibility of cardioversion.

If you are 78 years old, have atrial fibrillation for 5 years, have hypertension and diabetes for many years, and have heart failure, the possibility of restoring sinus rhythm is almost zero. The goal at this time is to achieve the first three, not uncomfortable, the heart rate is not fast, and the left atrium is not big, so there are fewer drugs, fewer side effects, no heart failure, and high quality of life. Except ECG atrial fibrillation, others, like good people, do not affect life. Objectively and pragmatically, this is quite good.

After all, no matter how hard doctors try, they can't cure the 70-and 80-year-olds back to 17- 18. This is what I call being objective and pragmatic.

In addition, the cured patients basically do not relapse, except for a few malignant stimuli, such as being particularly tired, angry and drinking a lot of wine.

Disclaimer: In order to ensure efficiency, I have set up many incurable situations, which can be cured, but cannot be cured. So my process is: telephone consultation (asking all questions such as illness), come back if possible, and make an appointment on WeChat before coming. If you come directly, you may not be able to do it, or if you do it, there is no possibility of cure. Call first anyway.

I spent more than 20 years studying my own treatment methods, and my theory was put forward by my own research. So fresh, maybe many people don't believe it, everything goes with fate.

Five years ago, I proposed that "atrial premature beats are the prelude to atrial fibrillation" (written in my monograph "Treating Heart Disease with Traditional Chinese Medicine"). A few days ago this year, in March 20 19, arrhythmia experts from the European Heart Association clearly pointed out that atrial premature beats were an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation. That is, I met a European cardiologist five years ago.

Not much to say.