The relationship between economy and war?

The relationship between economy and war? War has its particularity. "Therefore, war is not equal to general politics. Politics is a bloodless war, and war is a bloody politics, which vividly and profoundly reveals the relationship between war and politics. Secondly, war is subordinate to politics, because war is the continuation of politics, politics is the purpose, and war is the means, which will inevitably make politics have a decisive impact on war. It also determines that the relationship between politics and war is obedience. War must obey politics, and strategy must obey politics. The decisive influence of politics on war is mainly manifested in the following four aspects. First, politics determines the outbreak and end of war. Second, politics determines the nature and outcome of war. The nature of war is determined by the political purpose of war. The progress or reaction of political purpose determines the justice or injustice of war, while the nature of war determines the people's heart, which has a decisive influence on the future and outcome of war. As * * * pointed out when analyzing the people's liberation war: "The advantage of Chiang Kai-shek's military power is only a temporary phenomenon, only a temporary factor. The aid of American imperialism, the anti-people nature of Chiang Kai-shek's war and the turn of people's hearts are constant factors; In this respect, the PLA has an advantage. The patriotic and just revolutionary nature of the People's Liberation Army war will inevitably win the support of the people of the whole country, which is the political basis for defeating Chiang Kai-shek. " (Selected Works of Mao Zedong, page * * * 1246) Third, politics has stipulated the guiding line of war, and the leading role of politics in war is realized through the guiding line of war, which is stipulated by the political line of the class leading the war. Fourth, politics directs all forms of struggle and creates conditions for war. In the process of preparing for and carrying out the war, there are many forms of military struggle, and at the same time, they also need the direct or indirect cooperation of other forms of struggle, such as economic, cultural, diplomatic and other forms of struggle, and these forms of struggle are all controlled by politics. Giving full play to this commanding role of politics can give full play to the role of various means of struggle, mobilize manpower, material resources and financial resources to the maximum extent, and create more favorable conditions for the victory of the war. In addition, the decisive influence of politics on war is also highlighted in the role of human spiritual factors in war. Spiritual factors are one of the decisive factors to win more wars. Therefore, strengthening the cultivation and construction of spiritual factors in war is an important issue that we must attach great importance to. Third, war reacts on politics. Classical writers of Marxism and * * * fully affirmed the reaction of war to politics when discussing the decisive role of politics in war. First, once a war breaks out, it will develop according to its own laws, and politics must pay full attention to the independence of the war so that its activities can help achieve the political goals of the war; If political activities ignore or violate the objective laws of war, there is a danger of total annihilation. Secondly, historical experience has proved that the outcome of the war directly affects the political trend and policies of both sides after the war. The degree of influence varies with the nature and situation of the war. The failure of one side will often change the political trend before the war, the domestic political situation and policies, because "military bankruptcy cannot be the beginning of a profound political crisis." (Selected Works of Lenin's Military Affairs, p. 13) Sometimes, certain policies can be adjusted without changing the political direction. * * * said: "The central task and the highest form of revolution is to seize power by armed means and solve problems by war." (* * * Selected Works, page 5 14) No class in history seized state power without war. This fact eloquently proves that just war is the correct way to promote the progress of human society and realize class liberation. Only when the revolutionary class and the nation successfully wage the revolutionary war can they be liberated and realize the political goals of the revolution. On the other hand, if the revolutionary war is not waged or the war fails, the oppressed and enslaved status cannot be changed. The relationship between war and economy Any unjust war is a paper tiger in the face of public justice. As the saying goes, those who get the word help more, and those who lose it help less. It is impossible for any "big country" to occupy a country with strong force in the future. Any war of aggression can win the war, but the final victory of the war will always belong to the just people. Now all countries pay attention to developing their own military forces. Moreover, some big countries are launching the third round of arms race, some for their own security reasons, some for the expansion of political ambitions and the strategic shift of incompetent leadership. Everything comes from the current world economy. The world economy continues to decline, and the possession of selfish desires has exceeded the equilibrium tendency of the economy; The world economy is like an overloaded trailer, breathing forward and even stopping. No one in today's countries can change the overall situation of the world economy. Therefore, some countries (such as the United States, Britain, Japan, Italy and other developed countries) have taken wars to divert people's attention in order to get rid of today's economic problems; Second, we want to stimulate our economic development through war consumption. So now there is a small-scale war in the region, but this can't fundamentally solve the economic problem. History has proved that from the Gulf War to the recent Iraq War, the further expansion of the scale of the war can only reflect the further intensification of its domestic economic contradictions. The trend of deepening contradictions seems inevitable. Those who claim that politics and economy are important can only look at the ocean and sigh, but there is nothing they can do, let nature take its course and live in peace. Therefore, I admire and fear the war and dare not launch a large-scale war.

The relationship between war and economy is judged by the time, process and result of war. If it can be completed in a short time. Will not have a big impact on China's economy. After all, China's gross national product is huge, and regional wars have little influence on it. If it takes a long time and the procedure is not optimistic, it may cause people's psychological panic or investors' bearish factors in a short time. In that case, economic development will be temporarily suspended, house prices and stocks will fall, but stocks of military enterprises and related industries will rise. Therefore, this is not a simple yes or no question, but a complex question with different development trends according to different industries and levels.

It's hard.

Is America getting richer? The weapon system is sophisticated, and the civilian facilities are broken and old-they can only get poorer and poorer.

The United States will also become "poorer and poorer."

By virtue of its special favorable geographical position, the United States really took advantage of the two world wars in the last century. However, after World War II, the United States did not always "get rich by fighting", and the most typical one was the Vietnam War. The impact of the war on the American economy is very obvious: First, the direct expenditure of the Vietnam War increased sharply from 1 billion dollars in fiscal year/965 to 27 billion dollars in fiscal year 1968. From the fiscal year 1964 to the fiscal year 1969, the US military expenditure almost doubled, which led to the worsening financial situation. Since fiscal year 1965, there has been a deficit for four consecutive years, and the total amount has exceeded the sum of all previous deficits in fiscal year 19. At the same time, because the industrial development is heavily tilted towards the military, "national defense construction" has brought a serious negative impact on "national economic construction", resulting in a decline in the competitiveness of people's livelihood industries and a weakening of export capacity. As a result, American foreign trade, which had maintained a surplus for nearly 80 years since 1893, began to show a deficit at 197 1, and the increase in the balance of payments deficit led to the dollar crisis and Nixon *.

The Vietnam War not only caused the economic crisis in the United States, but for a long time after the end of World War II, the United States engaged in an arms race, which also curbed economic growth. 1982, a non-governmental disarmament institution in the United States counted the average ratio of military expenditure to GNP (gross national product) and the average annual growth rate of GNP in nine western countries from 1960 to 1980, which clearly showed the long-term development trend that the higher the military expenditure of a country, the lower the economic growth rate, among which the United States had the highest military expenditure ratio, while GNP had the highest annual growth rate.

Fighting made the "rich" pay a high price.

Although many new technologies in the United States were originally developed for military needs, the whole national economy benefited by extending them to the civilian field. But more facts show that the United States attaches too much importance to the development of military technology, which affects the competitiveness of people's livelihood industries. Otherwise, the United States will not lose to Japan and Europe in some major livelihood industries. The first person who made a fortune by fighting was an American arms dealer. It is reported that the sales of major American arms dealers have increased rapidly since the Iraq war. This undoubtedly promoted the growth of the gross domestic product of the United States. However, under the control of the "national macro-view", did the arms dealers get rich and play the role of "interacting with the national economy", thus playing an important driving chain role for the survival and development of the United States?

Recently, after experiencing the worst power outage in American history, people have increasingly seen the state of "sophisticated weapon systems and dilapidated civilian facilities" in the United States. The blackout exposed the major defects of the power supply network, but this is only the tip of the iceberg of the national infrastructure problem. To a certain extent, the prosperity of American military departments and industries is at the expense of reducing and sacrificing the "wealth" of people's livelihood departments.

The United States is keen on developing weapons, but pays little attention to environmental protection. The population of the United States is less than 1/20 of the world's total population, but greenhouse gas emissions account for 1/4 of global emissions. Nowadays, it is a well-known fact that war consumes resources and destroys the environment. Although the United States always fights abroad, the serious consequences of the continuous deterioration of the global environment caused by repeated wars and defeats will not only hurt the countries where the wars took place, but also "feed back" to the United States itself. The global environment is the most precious and irreplaceable wealth in the world, including the United States. In this sense, in the final analysis, "the more the United States fights, the poorer the world."

What is the driving force of high-tech development?

The article Yuefu believes that "the role of the market in the development of modern high technology is extremely limited", and the real driving force that can affect the development of high technology is the development of military technology and the demand of war. In fact, many high and new technologies, from computers and integrated circuits to the Internet, were originally developed for military needs. But generally speaking, there is no denying that in a market economy country like the United States, the main driving force for high-tech development is still the market, and we cannot reverse the priority order. Statistics show that the United States accounts for about 32% of national R&D expenditure, of which military R&D expenditure only accounts for about 18%, while private enterprises account for 60-70%. This shows that in today's world, except for a few countries, private enterprises in market competition will always be the main force of technological development.

The article also summarizes the lessons of the former Soviet Union as "making army building and national economy into two skins". The problem of "two skins" is of course a lesson, but the biggest lesson of the former Soviet Union is to surpass its own national strength and engage in an arms race. In a sense, it can also be said that it is trapped by the United States. In addition, the article "getting richer" is too harsh on the judgment of the whole international situation. For China, the most important task is still how to firmly grasp the "historical opportunity period" in the next 20 years, better develop itself and build a well-off society in an all-round way.

The essence of war in economic history and the relationship between war and economic growth. What is the movie economy of the US-Japan War saying? 18 American-Japanese war movie, what is the economy talking about? 1-8 American-Japanese relations have a characteristic. For example, the company sends you to work in the countryside for one day and gets off work at six in the afternoon, but the work in the countryside ends at four. The Japanese will work in the company for more than an hour and finish the other half hour. This kind of professionalism is really worth learning. Japan's animation industry is invincible in the world, and the reason why it can attract young people all over the world is inseparable from its hard work spirit. As far as I know, many cartoonists died at work before they died, not at home or in the hospital. No pains, no gains. It's definitely not just talk. Spy intelligence work, no matter in which country, is very secret, and we are familiar with the CIA in the United States. The CIA is only an intelligence organization station in the United States, and other departments generally have intelligence workstations. During the Republic of China in China, there was both military reunification and central reunification. Finally, the unification of China became the same party bureau, and the military unification became the secret service bureau. In fact, it is an intelligence workstation sent to various places, which is directly managed by the top management, and the manager is the famous Mao Renfeng. Above is Chiang Kai-shek. The biggest difference between intelligence work and other confidential departments is that the fewer intermediate links, the better. The biggest fear of secrecy work is to rock the boat. The less people know, the better. Japan's intelligence work is particularly prominent, but the efficiency and intelligence gathering ability of Mitsui Intelligence Workstation under the Mitsui Consortium is higher than that of the CIA. The job content is basically the same, that is, what information is secretly collected. Japan's intelligence work is said to be under the personal command of His Majesty the Emperor. One thing can prove the strength of Japanese intelligence work. During the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression period, the map of China drawn by the Japanese military was even more detailed and comprehensive than that drawn by China. On the Japanese map, every river and mountain in China is drawn in detail. Every time China intercepts a prisoner of war, it will first search the Japanese map of China. This kind of intelligence work ability is simply frightening. At that time, it was a map, but now it is a commercial map. The ambition of the Japanese people goes beyond simple economic development. Japan's economic and cultural strength is not strong, it is simply strong. Through the continuous growth of economic and cultural strength, the economic strength has jumped to the second place in the world. But it didn't last long. When Japan was jubilant, a modern financial war began unconsciously. This war is just a record in the history of financial war! But it is the most meaningful financial war and the most representative financial war. It can be said that the source reflects high technology! The performance is about to begin. Financial nuclear bomb destroys Japan, Japan and the United States. Japan-US relations always feel subtle. It's not that they have too many differences on big issues, but that both countries are stronger and always want to be realistic about their own strength. The so-called: one mountain can't accommodate two tigers. Throughout the historical development, the confrontation between the United States and Japan is not only large in quantity, but also high in quality. Basically, Japan is defeated every time, but it can't be blamed for not working hard enough. It can only be said that its IQ is still not enough. Let's review the historical events in the United States and Japan: Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in the United States. I looked up a lot of information at this time, but it was mentioned in the TV series divine retribution. I don't know the exact date. Consider it the 7 th. I won't introduce the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor here. This event not only wrote many books, but also made a movie. But I have some gossip here. Although it is gossip, it is quite true. Japan has hit more than a dozen countries in Asia, and it has gained a lot. It already feels that almost all the meat is on the lips and it is meaningless. I began to plan against America. In the first world war and the second stop, the United States was basically a spectator, maintaining neutrality and making a lot of money from it. As long as you leave me alone, you won't take part in fighting me in Asia and Europe, and it's none of my business. But on this day, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Historically, it is basically successful. The success of Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor benefited from two preconditions: First, the information about the attack on the United States could not be leaked. Second, we should choose the time and place of the sneak attack. Introduce the geographical location of Pearl Harbor: Pearl Harbor is located on most plains between Raven Mountain and Waianai Mountain on the south bank of Oahu, adjacent to the only deep-water port-Honolulu Port. It is the base of the US Navy and one of the largest and safest berthing ports in the Pacific Islands. Ordinary civilian ships and foreign ships are not allowed to enter without the special permission of the US Navy Department. It can be regarded as an American military fortress. Sneak attack time: Sneak attack time is not just a lucky day, but the most special day. America's rest day, the whole country, puts down work and rests on this day. With these two points, we need the last job, which is also the most critical and important job-confidentiality. Once the secret work is leaked in advance, what has been prepared in front will be in vain. As the saying goes, the weather is unpredictable, but this most important top secret content was leaked, but it was not American intelligence personnel who intercepted the message code, but British intelligence personnel. This is how it should be. The day before, the Japanese emperor sent the seventh secret telegram to Isoroku Yamamoto, commander-in-chief of the army, of which the first six were successfully intercepted by American intelligence personnel, but the contents of the first six cables are unknown, but knowing the contents of the seventh cable can easily decode the contents of the first six cables. The content of the seventh time is extremely crucial, and the main content is expressed in four words: time and place. The content of the seventh telegram is the specific time and place when Japan attacked the United States. Let's reason about the contents of the first six telegrams: the general idea is that the target we want to attack, the number of people and equipment we want to participate in the war, etc., have nothing to do with the United States. Just the day before, British intelligence personnel successfully deciphered the last secret message sent by the Japanese emperor. British intelligence personnel immediately told this information to British Prime Minister Churchill. It is said that there are no more than single digits in Britain who know about it. In principle, Churchill should call Roosevelt at this time and tell him the contents of the last secret message. But Churchill didn't tell Roosevelt the seventh secret telegram. According to common sense, this is a very strange thing, because the relationship between Britain and the United States is very good, almost a pair of pants grew up. Americans are mostly descended from the British. There is only one reasonable explanation for this strange phenomenon, and that is the global situation at that time. It was during World War II, when Germany was extremely arrogant and Britain was evenly matched and had a splitting headache. Churchill intercepted the secret message and didn't tell Roosevelt to involve the United States in World War II. So as to jointly fight against the German fascist alliance. Because the secret message was not conveyed, Japan successfully attacked Pearl Harbor. As for being happy in Japan, the United States has not been idle and sent two atomic bombs to Japan. As the saying goes, it's indecent to come. You send shells, I send atomic bombs. There is still weight in the gift bag. Article transferred from: People who read this article also saw Ningbo, the United States and Japan [reprint], the third of China's three naval fleets-the North Sea Fleet Scorpio speed dating constellation Pisces speed dating constellation Cancer boys speed dating love 20 10 Cancer love fortune Wuzhen weather, Wuzhen iphone forum in the rain! What is file system fat? The principle of fat file system.

The relationship between politics and war In a modern peaceful society, war seems to be a distant word to us, but in fact, war is everywhere. War is something we don't want to happen, but sometimes it is necessary. Because sometimes it is related to the politics and economy of a country. Generally speaking, economy determines politics and war, politics determines war, and war reacts on economy and politics. Therefore, war, politics and economy are interactive.

First of all, economy determines politics. The so-called "weak countries have no diplomacy." Now all countries are developing their economies, and China is no exception. Why should we vigorously develop the economy? On the one hand, economic development is to improve people's livelihood; On the other hand, in order to enhance the comprehensive national strength and improve the political status of the country in international affairs. The power of economy is enormous. While economic development brings us a better life, the country also has the power to strengthen national defense construction. Economic prosperity can solve many problems. The economic development of modern China is a good example. China's rapid economic development has shocked the world, and China's exchanges with other countries are getting closer and closer, which is the reason for the improvement of its international status. At the same time, the economy also determines the feasibility of war. If a country's economy can't develop, what can it use to wage war? In fact, the national economy played an auxiliary role in the war. It can be seen that economic development determines political status and the feasibility of war.

Second, politics determines war. This is why our country should strive to improve its political status in international affairs. In this way, we also have the right to speak. For those who support peace, we can resist some political diplomacy that uses politics as a mask, shouts peace slogans and launches wars through international relations. Just like the United States, it interferes in other countries' affairs through international relations under the pretext of protecting human rights. Obviously, this has seriously violated the interests of other countries and may also lead to unnecessary wars. Our country loves peace, and we must safeguard it through our own political power, so as to safeguard world peace, stability, development and prosperity. War will also have an adverse effect on economy and politics. War will bring people inevitable disasters, and the destructive power of this war is unimaginable. The war has affected the country's economic construction, scientific and technological construction and national defense construction. At the same time, due to the economic depression caused by the war, people's living standards have declined. Everything has two sides, and it is not difficult for us to think that war stems from conflicts of interest. "There is no eternal friendship, only eternal interests", and waging war is beneficial to one side. At the same time, some countries have gained benefits and developed their economies through war. War is also the conquest of the other side by one side through violence, which also establishes the status of the country at this time.

War, economy and politics interact. But we know that war is cruel and will bring disaster to the country and people anyway.

The relationship between war and politics, economy and people determines the superstructure, and the fundamental cause of war is determined by the law of unbalanced political and economic development, so economy is the decisive factor. People have played a role in promoting and catalyzing.

What is war? The relationship between man and war? The relationship between weapons in war? After the contradiction between ideology and interests intensifies, war is the most effective solution. Weapons are just tools. Man's ideology determines the direction of war, just as tools cannot be operated unattended and weapons cannot be operated unattended. Advanced weapons only determine their own casualties, not the outcome of the war. The victory or defeat of the war is caused by many reasons.

The relationship between peace and war? Unity of opposites, the two are opposite to each other, but the war is for peace.

The relationship between literary works and war Literary works reflect scenes such as the occurrence of war, and war provides material for literary works. Literary and artistic works can also inspire the morale of the troops on both sides of the war and promote the combat effectiveness of the troops.

The relationship between news photography and war? A war correspondent? Photography is part of the profession of war reporters.

Of course, there are also many army soldiers and propaganda civilians who bring their own cameras to shoot.

Pay attention to the cruelty of the battlefield, the style of soldiers and the dribs and drabs of human nature.