What are the places where the Ministry of Environment talks about cases?

Why have these places been interviewed twice?

"Guarantee not to be interviewed for the second time" is the attitude and determination of many local responsible comrades who have been interviewed. However, combing the interview cases of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment in recent years, it is found that some places have been interviewed twice, and individual responsible persons have been interviewed twice during their tenure.

Following the interview of 5438+ 10 in June last year, it was interviewed again on August 6 this year. Linfen, together with Harbin, Lvliang, Yangquan, Handan and Zhao County in Shijiazhuang, became the place where the Ministry of Ecology and Environment interviewed twice, which attracted wide attention.

Similarly, after the prefecture-level cities were interviewed, the counties (cities, districts) under their jurisdiction were also interviewed, including Baoding, Zhengzhou, Changzhi, Hengshui and Jincheng.

Harbin, Lvliang, Yangquan, Handan, Linfen and Zhao County in Shijiazhuang were all interviewed twice.

According to incomplete statistics, up to now, 74 localities and departments (including duplicates) have been interviewed by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (formerly the Ministry of Environmental Protection). Among them, Harbin, Lvliang, Yangquan, Handan, Linfen and Zhao County in Shijiazhuang were interviewed twice.

Harbin was interviewed twice for the first time.

20 14 12 the former head of the environmental supervision bureau of the Ministry of environmental protection met with the head of the Harbin municipal government, demanding a comprehensive rectification of the listed and supervised enterprises.

20 17, 1 1, AQI was "off the list" for a long time because of persistent serious and above pollution, and Harbin was interviewed again, becoming the first city to be interviewed twice.

It was Han Dan who interviewed twice in the shortest time.

From August, 2065438 to August, 2007, due to the problem of strengthening supervision in the jurisdiction, the cancellation rate of rectification was only 6.4%, and the number of problematic enterprises with inadequate rectification was the largest, so an interview was conducted in Handan City.

Only less than 9 months later, in May of 20 18, Han Dan was interviewed again for failing to complete the comprehensive air pollution control task in autumn and winter. It is worth noting that Yongnian District of Handan City was also interviewed.

The only county interviewed twice is Zhao County, Shijiazhuang.

In April of 20 17, the average concentrations of PM 10 and PM2.5 increased by 55.6% and 66.7% respectively, and Zhao County of Shijiazhuang was interviewed.

In August, 20 18, 53 atmospheric environmental problems were found in two rounds of intensive inspection, and the number of problems in the second round of inspection increased by 3 1 item, so Zhao County was interviewed again.

Lvliang and Linfen were interviewed for two consecutive years.

2065438+May 2005, Lvliang was interviewed because of the pollution problems of some key enterprises and local oil refining workshops in its jurisdiction. 20 16 12, a slurry leakage accident occurred in Shanxi Huaxing aluminum industry, causing environmental pollution, and Lvliang was interviewed again.

20 17- 17, Linfen was interviewed because of the continuous deterioration of atmospheric environmental quality and the long-term "excessive" concentration of sulfur dioxide. On August 6 this year, Linfen was interviewed again because of the falsification of environmental monitoring data.

Yangquan was also interviewed twice.

20 1 1 16 10, the mayor of Yangquan was interviewed because of the serious air and water pollution problems and the failure to implement environmental protection responsibilities. In May, 20 18, Yangquan was interviewed again for failing to complete the comprehensive control task of air pollution in autumn and winter.

After Jincheng, Baoding, Zhengzhou, Changzhi and Hengshui were interviewed, the counties (cities, districts) under their jurisdiction were interviewed again.

After a prefecture-level city was interviewed, all counties (cities, districts) under its jurisdiction should speed up rectification, but it was found that some prefecture-level cities were interviewed after being interviewed.

Jincheng, Shanxi Province was interviewed in May 2065438+2008 for failing to complete the comprehensive control task of air pollution in autumn and winter. Only three months later, Jincheng City under its jurisdiction was interviewed for the obvious rebound in the number of problems found by intensive supervision in key areas.

Hebei Hengshui was interviewed in July 20 17 because of the slow progress in strengthening supervision and rectification. In April of the same year, Shenzhou City under its jurisdiction was interviewed because of the severe environmental quality situation and the ineffective implementation of key environmental protection measures.

Baoding, Hebei Province was interviewed due to Baiyangdian pollution in April, 201May, Qingyuan District under its jurisdiction was interviewed due to inadequate supervision and rectification in August, 201August, and Quyang County was interviewed due to strong supervision and found the most problems.

Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, was interviewed in July 20 15 due to outstanding problems such as poor atmospheric control and outstanding dust pollution, and Xingyang City under its jurisdiction was interviewed in July 20 17 due to the slow progress of strengthening supervision and rectification.

Changzhi, Shanxi Province, was interviewed on April 20 16 because of the obvious deterioration of air quality and the failure to implement environmental protection responsibilities. Changzhi National High-tech Industrial Development Zone was interviewed in July 20 17 due to poor supervision and rectification.

More special are Xinxiang and Xingtai.

Xinxiang City was not interviewed, but its muye district 20 17 and huixian city 20 18 were interviewed.

Although Xingtai City was not interviewed, Longyao County and Renxian County under its jurisdiction were instructed by the former Ministry of Environmental Protection to take the lead in the interview on July 201May.

These counties (cities, districts) under their jurisdiction were interviewed, and the higher-level municipal government cannot say that there is no responsibility at all, at least indicating that the interview and rectification of prefecture-level cities are not comprehensive and the pressure transmission is not in place.

Behind the two interviews is the absence of performance.

According to the Interim Measures for Interviews of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, interviews should be conducted if there are 1 1 situations, such as unfinished objectives and tasks, obvious deterioration of environmental quality, serious violation of environmental laws after repeated investigations, and outstanding forgery of monitoring data.

Correspondingly, the second interview in Harbin was mainly due to the obvious deterioration of environmental quality, Lvliang was mainly due to serious pollution incidents, Handan and Yangquan were mainly due to the failure to complete relevant objectives and tasks, Zhaoxian in Shijiazhuang was mainly due to the repeated investigation and rectification of related problems, and Linfen was mainly due to the falsification of monitoring data.

Visible, although the reasons are different, but the relevant local party committees and governments are not in place or not in place, it is almost a * * * problem. During the interview, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment also pointed out the problems behind it, such as insufficient understanding, poor supervision, lax and untrue.

When Harbin was interviewed for the second time, it was accused that the response to heavily polluted weather was a mere formality, and the emergency plan for heavily polluted weather was generally lax and untrue, and the problem of illegal enterprises was obvious.

During the second interview, Lvliang was accused that the rectification of the 20 15 interview was not in place, and many requirements of the first interview were not effectively implemented.

When Linfen was interviewed for the second time, he was accused of not performing his duties in place, feeling dull, not alert and seriously neglecting his work.

When Han Dan was interviewed for the second time, he was accused of many air pollution problems and his work was not in place.

That is to say, after the relevant cities were interviewed, the rectification work was not in place, some were "pressing the gourd to float the ladle", some were "seeing the trees without seeing the forest", some were "treating the symptoms but not the root cause", and some were simply "healing the scars and forgetting the pain".

Judging from the reorganization of interviews with relevant cities, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment will definitely focus on and continue to pay attention to the outstanding environmental problems of these cities, constantly transmit pressure, and urge local governments to truly consolidate their responsibilities.

For example, in view of the problems existing in Linfen, the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment said that the next step, whether it is to strengthen the supervision of air pollution control or the central environmental protection inspector "looking back", will focus on Linfen.

You should learn from your mistakes. For the cities that have been interviewed, there is definitely no idea of breaking through. Only by changing your position and completely following the requirements of interview rectification will you not be interviewed for the second and third time.

Must be severely punished.

The news comes from Netease News.