An argument about the weather.

I'm afraid the author of this blog post doesn't even know what straight and oblique are.

Let's look at the first half of the argument. There are two views: first, the eccentricity of the earth can be ignored; Second, the diameter of the sun is much larger, so the incident angle of the sun is the same everywhere. Not to mention reasoning, the answer is obvious. The higher the latitude, the lower the incident angle of the sun. I can understand the truth after a little observation, so I won't go into details. The incident angle of the sun is determined by the ground plane, which refers to the angle between the incident direction of the sun (which can be regarded as parallel light) and the ground. The greater the angle, the higher the height of the sun. To be honest, I really don't know how this blogger came to such a conclusion. I'm afraid the geography teacher in junior high school will have a heart attack when he sees such remarks.

Looking at the latter part of the point of view, not to mention right or wrong, we can give three refutations: first, if the weather and atmospheric refraction are not considered, the time for receiving sunlight is the same in all parts of the earth. According to this theory, the temperature in the world should be the same; Secondly, netizens have pointed out that according to this truth, the summer of the North and South Poles should have the hottest summer, which is obviously absurd; Thirdly, for rainy areas like Sichuan basin, the accumulated temperature time should be less, but the Sichuan plain is warmer than the Yangtze River basin in winter and summer.

I'm afraid junior high school students can also refute this argument. If the landlord is interested in celestial sports, middle school geography textbooks can also give you a lot of foundation.