The advantages and disadvantages of natural disasters and man-made disasters who are more terrible.

Natural disasters will certainly cause us great losses, but natural disasters are irreversible and objective. Just as people will die one day, it goes without saying that natural disasters are terrible. In the face of natural disasters, we human beings can unite and work together to overcome them. Concept of man-made disaster: Man-made disaster is caused by various subjective and objective reasons, and it is a disaster brought by human beings in violation of natural and social laws.

We believe that man-made disasters are more terrible than natural disasters. As the saying goes, "it is still a violation of heaven to commit evil; You can't live if you do it yourself. " The reason is that we always think that man-made disasters can be avoided, but in reality, people's personality and behavior, as well as conflicts of interest between people, make all this inevitable. What can be avoided and can't be avoided is the most terrible. Below I will demonstrate from the following three points.

1, the destructive power of man-made disasters is more lasting. Man-made disasters are largely caused by human desires. Compared with natural disasters, man-made disasters are more purposeful, organized and disciplined, and the consequences caused by such disasters are often more tragic and serious. Among them, World War II is the best example. Only the greed of the three Axis countries turned the whole world into a human purgatory. 2. The influence of man-made disasters is greater than natural disasters. Take the Sichuan earthquake as an example. After the earthquake, people became more United. However, the man-made disaster that caused a large number of students to die in the earthquake caused more people to be angry and chilling. More importantly, the school collapsed first, the government office building collapsed later, and the degree of office building collapse was much lower than that of the school, which greatly reduced the credibility of the government. Which natural disaster caused this bad influence? To some extent, the occurrence of man-made disasters is unpredictable. People are not machines, and negligence is inevitable, which is one of the reasons why car accidents have been emerging one after another. Secondly, people's hearts are unpredictable, and the dark side of human nature will always exist, which is why things like the Iraq war, prisoner abuse by the US military and terrorism will still happen in today's Datong world. ..

So we think that man-made disasters are more terrible than natural disasters. ..

Strengthen the demonstration of two arguments

1. When we reach a certain scientific level, natural disasters can be greatly reduced. Man-made disasters are hardly man-made! Many natural disasters are rooted in man-made disasters. The history of China is used for argument, but people who changed their lives and changed their dynasties were never miserable because of natural disasters, but because of the high-pressure rule of the ruling class, which included the worst disaster of the Chinese nation during the opium, invasion of China, anti-Japanese war and civil war, which was unmatched by earthquakes and floods.

2. Man is complex, and how to understand his laws, even if it can be understood, is more difficult than understanding the laws of nature. If the other party doesn't even admit this, it means that people are not as complex and dynamic as other species in nature. This obviously violates the objective law that a person is the center.

The reason why man-made disasters are terrible is not only the unpredictability mentioned above, but also the frequency of man-made disasters. People can constantly harass and attack a target. More importantly, most of the objects of man-made disasters are people, and cannibalism between the same family is more terrible than cannibalism between different species, because they know what they are afraid of and what can kill each other.

Man-made disasters can be avoided, but it is undeniable that man-made disasters continue to occur. Natural disasters will bring us economic and even life losses, which is really terrible. However, isn't it even more insignificant to face the social moral corruption brought by man-made disasters and the fatal negative impact on social development? A storm, we get suffering, but the harvest is strong, but a corrupt official who fled away not only took away hundreds of millions of state property, but also the spirit of a nation and the hope of China's rejuvenation.

Natural disasters make people afraid and try to survive. Man-made disasters will make people lose hope of survival. Man-made disasters are more terrible.

6. Society has been developing, but when did the war stop? Society is progressing, so are weapons! Eliminating war is a joke. As long as human beings exist, war exists. War is caused by human desire. Desire is human nature and cannot be changed! After natural disasters, there were troops in the disaster relief, but what were the troops doing in the war? They are killing people. Natural disasters are rare. How many man-made disasters are there? Natural disasters are not frequent, but when have man-made disasters stopped? All the time. Do you know how much the stock market has been sucked away this year? How many times more than the state-funded disaster area? The market value of A shares lost 2 trillion yuan in three days. What concept? One person burns 1W a day. Is this comparable to a natural disaster?

Three opposing arguments

We believe that the loss of man-made disasters is much higher than that of natural disasters, and man-made disasters are more terrible than natural disasters.

Summary of the opponent's attack and defense:

First, let's look at each other's arguments. On the other hand, natural disasters are divided into two parts, one can be controlled and the other can't be controlled, but they can't be controlled by comparison. Is this afraid to face the problem directly or not pay attention to the opponent? Or do you admit that most natural disasters are controllable and not as terrible as man-made disasters?

Let's look at the positive comparison standard.

1. What is a man-made disaster that can be controlled? If your understanding of control is to reduce and avoid, why not natural disasters?

What is an uncontrollable natural disaster? It's not a plague, is it? Black Death. Really? Have you forgotten SARS?

According to your definition of man-made disaster, isn't man-made disaster more terrible? For an individual, isn't the mental fear of disasters that only befall him greater than the kind of loose and intermittent fear? For the whole society and the process of human civilization, isn't the directional man-made disaster more devastating than the natural disaster without ambition? From cults to the Cultural Revolution, which one did not leave painful memories for the society? On the contrary, which natural disaster has caused fatal damage to human civilization?

As for your third question, you said that man-made disasters and natural disasters are mixed, such as the terrible events that happened in our country in the 1960s. Individuals can't get rid of fear, and natural disasters or man-made disasters are more terrible.

Back to our question.

In World War II, 6 1 countries and regions participated in the war,1700 million people participated in the war, more than 90 million soldiers and civilians were killed or injured in the war, and the economic loss was as high as 4 trillion US dollars. What natural disaster can match this astronomical figure? In addition to these losses, it has also dealt a great blow to human civilization and seriously hindered the development of European civilization. Peace and development are contemporary themes. It is the seriousness of these problems that has curbed the terrible man-made disaster. Only in this way can human civilization be promoted, and more talents realize the horror of war, because they long for the dawn of peace, and some natural disasters are short-lived and unpredictable, which makes people's understanding of natural disasters gradually fade away, but scientists are still trying to overcome them. This is the embodiment of human will. It can be seen that the devastating impact of man-made disasters is more terrible than natural disasters.

1. The destructive power of man-made disasters is often greater than that of natural disasters. From the historical process of mankind, we know that there has never been a natural disaster with greater losses than man-made disasters. The shadow of the two world wars is still hard to shake off. Can other debaters find out which natural disaster caused more losses than World War II? At the same time, when natural disasters begin, people can give full play to their subjective initiative and take timely measures to reduce losses before the end of natural disasters, while man-made disasters are not. If the war is a life-and-death contest, defeating and destroying each other may be the best way to save yourself. Is this endless cruelty comparable to natural disasters?

2. The destructive power of man-made disasters is more lasting. Man-made disasters are largely caused by human desires. Compared with natural disasters, man-made disasters are more purposeful, organized and disciplined, and the consequences caused by such disasters are often more tragic and serious. Among them, World War II is the best example. Only the greed of the three Axis countries turned the whole world into a human purgatory.

Man-made disasters have greater influence than natural disasters. Take the Sichuan earthquake as an example. After the earthquake, people became more United. However, the man-made disaster in which a large number of students died due to the bean curd dregs project in the earthquake made more people angry and chilling. More importantly, the school collapsed first, the government office building collapsed later, and the degree of office building collapse was much lower than that of the school, which greatly reduced the credibility of the government. Which natural disaster caused this bad influence?

To some extent, the occurrence of man-made disasters is unpredictable. People are not machines, so negligence is inevitable, which is one of the reasons why car accidents have been emerging one after another. Secondly, people are unpredictable, and the dark side of human nature will always exist, which is why things like the Iraq war, prisoner abuse and terrorism will still happen in today's Datong world. These are more likely to cause panic than natural disasters.

Natural disasters will certainly cause us great losses, but such losses are irreversible and objective, just like people will die sooner or later, so it goes without saying that natural disasters are terrible. In the face of natural disasters, we human beings can unite and work together to overcome them. We believe that man-made disasters are more terrible than natural disasters, as the saying goes, "it is still a violation of heaven to commit evil;" You can't live if you do it yourself. " The reason is that we always think that man-made disasters can be avoided, but in reality, people's personality and behavior, as well as conflicts of interest between people, make all this inevitable. What can be avoided and can't be avoided is the most terrible.

1. Natural disasters cannot be prevented. They came suddenly and no one could predict them.

Natural disasters are inevitable and can only wait.

Man-made disasters can be prevented and educated, but natural disasters can't.

Natural disasters are non-negotiable.

Four debates

Man-made disasters are better than natural disasters.

1. Historically, no matter in China or overseas, casualties caused by natural disasters only account for a small part. On the contrary, the continuous war and the endless search for the people's fat and paste have caused countless people to leave their homes and lose their lives. I remember that there is a saying, "Prosperity causes people to suffer, and death causes people to suffer", which really hits the nail on the head. To give a few examples: Mount Vesuvius erupted in 79 AD, burying the famous ancient city of Pompeii, which seemed to be a huge loss, but it was nothing compared with the cities destroyed by the Crusades in the early Middle Ages. Today, the sequela left by the Middle East Crusade has not been eliminated, and a large number of innocent lives are swallowed up every year. Take the biggest population decline in ancient Europe as an example. On the surface, it was because of the Black Death (that is, the plague), but the widespread spread of the Black Death was "benefited" from the crusaders who conquered everywhere. As for China's ancient cases, there are countless more. Every time the dynasty changed, the rulers were extravagant, and peasant wars were everywhere, which did not cause a large decline in population and great damage to production. So from the historical experience, man-made disasters are better than natural disasters.

Throughout the modern world in the industrial age, the two world wars are the best examples of man-made disasters. The Tangshan earthquake, Wenchuan earthquake and Indian Ocean tsunami that shocked the world only caused hundreds of thousands of casualties and tens of billions of yuan in economic losses, while the two world wars caused hundreds of millions of casualties and trillions of yuan in economic losses. Another example is the African continent where natural disasters are frequent. As we all know, in Africa, countless people die of AIDS, malaria, cholera, dengue fever and other diseases every year. But let's not forget that these diseases are not unique to Africa. Why are they so shocking only in Africa? To put it bluntly; Just because Africa is poor, but Africa's poverty is not the subjective reason of African people. I think it is self-evident who caused the current situation in Africa.

Definition: Natural disasters generally refer to disasters caused by nature, and man-made disasters are the harm caused by people's subjective consciousness and behavior.

Man-made disasters are more terrible than natural disasters, even though natural disasters may cause greater losses than man-made disasters. The reason is that man-made disasters can be avoided. Because it can be avoided and cannot be avoided, it is particularly unbearable;

Natural meteorological disasters such as wind, rain and lightning are undoubtedly natural disasters. But for those who can resist wind and rain, natural disasters are not terrible. The most terrible thing is the man-made disaster under the cover of natural disasters. Natural disasters are often predictable, and man-made disasters are difficult to find at ordinary times. It is often natural disasters that cover up man-made disasters, and man-made disasters are exposed through natural disasters, and the loss is heartbreaking.

Natural disasters are a big exposure of man-made disasters and a practical test of officials' sense of responsibility. Through the floods in Ning 'an Shalan, Heilongjiang, the lightning strikes of primary school students in Kaixian, Chongqing, and the floods in Sichuan, there is a shocking "man-made disaster" behind these seemingly natural disasters: the catastrophic disaster in Ning 'an Shalan Primary School in Heilongjiang claimed 1 17 lives, including 105 students. The root cause of this historical tragedy is the serious dereliction of duty of the party secretary and police captain in Shalan Town, and their failure to organize rescue work in time. In addition, because Shalan Town is located in the basin, the school had planned to build a two-story classroom or move the school to a higher position, but it was said that it was postponed because the relevant departments intercepted funds, which is undoubtedly a typical man-made disaster. Yihe Town, Kaixian County, Chongqing is a lightning-prone area in history. After on-site investigation and analysis by lightning protection experts, Xingye Village Primary School is located at the exposed commanding heights. In the northwest of the accident classroom, there are three big elms with a distance of more than 10 meters, which become natural lightning traps and increase the risk of lightning strikes in the classroom. Looking at the photos of the lightning strike scene is shocking, not only because of the tragic result of the incident, but also because there are hundreds of students in such a simple classroom, but the classroom in the minefield has not installed any lightning protection devices! After calculation, the school invested less than 1000 yuan to install a simple lightning protection device, which may avoid this disaster, but this is only a hypothesis! /kloc-what do you mean by 0/000 yuan there? The simplicity of students' classroom is enough to make people speak for themselves.

Man-made disasters are more terrible than natural disasters because:

1 foresees that nature is presented to human beings without reservation, and human beings can study it completely. According to related reports, the accuracy of human prediction of natural disasters is above 80%, while man-made disasters are different. People will hide the facts to facilitate their own man-made disasters. With the passage of time, our understanding of nature will continue to deepen, and man-made disasters will become more and more secretive and ingenious. Therefore, man-made disasters are even more unpredictable.

2 destructive. The shadow of the two world wars is still hard to shake off. Can the other debater find out which natural disaster caused more losses than World War II? At the same time, when natural disasters begin, people can play their own subjective initiative. Take timely measures to reduce losses before the end of natural disasters, while man-made disasters are not. If the war is a life-and-death contest, defeating and destroying each other may be the best way to save yourself. How can you have the leisure to take measures to remedy it before the end? Another example is a car accident. We can only sigh the fragility of life and watch it die instantly. The losses caused by man-made disasters are getting worse and worse, because it is difficult to make up. It seems that all the endings have been doomed from the beginning, why not be more terrible?

3 insist. There will always be no sequelae after natural disasters. Before and after the end, it can be said that the boundaries are clear, and people only need to rebuild after the disaster. Otherwise, man-made disasters are often difficult to calm down for a long time. The ancient people's crazy felling of forestry in the Loess Plateau is still hurting us. At that time, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, destroying two cities. Now the city has been rebuilt long ago, but deformed children are still born. After enduring the torture of the war, the local people had to face the pain of their loved ones and suffered another psychological blow. The horror of man-made disasters is beyond words. After all, comets only exist in movies. To sum up, man-made disasters are more difficult to predict, more destructive, harder to make up immediately, and more tragic. Their destructive power is more continuous in time and space. Therefore, I take the liberty of asking another debater to shout with us, man-made disasters are fiercer than tigers, and man-made disasters are more terrible than natural disasters!

According to Marxist philosophy, natural conditions and population factors are not decisive forces for social development, but productive forces. Productivity is the decisive force that determines social development. Natural disasters can only be regarded as natural forces. Can only play a role in promoting or delaying. Man-made disasters are people-centered, so man-made disasters can change history. . Emphasizing natural disasters is to deny the basic principles of Marxism, which is a challenge to Marxism. Challenges to all socialist countries and producers. Excuse me, your opponent, can you bear the consequences?

6. The melting of Antarctic glaciers will flood coastal and island countries. Is this a natural disaster or a man-made disaster? Isn't it because of the global warming and the melting of the Antarctic ice sheet that the atmospheric environment is destroyed by the population expansion? Do we have to blame our fault on the earth where we live? Is this what we call singing the humanity of the new era? Or is this what we call post-80s humanity? Will we run away? Should we run away?

Isn't it terrible that terrorists are running around the world? From March 20th, 2003 to March 9th, 2005, 24,865 Iraqi civilians died in the war. Among the dead, 82% were adult males and 9% were adult females. One tenth of the dead were under the age of 18. Yes, this is only one-tenth of the casualties of the Tangshan earthquake, but do we just judge his terrible degree from the data? Imagine that 82% of adult men in a country are dead. What does this mean? Can a country become an independent country when there are only some old people and women left?