Student Party. Want to start with SLR. Go to Tibet. Erenhot asks for recommendation.

I'll say a few words briefly and answer them first.

First of all, you can take any shot regardless of scenery or portrait, but the performance is different. So to put it bluntly: it is best to have all the money.

Secondly, there is nothing cheap about electronic products. Something that costs only a penny. Different price points are aimed at different markets.

Furthermore, D7 100, D7000 and D7000 are actually the subsequent upgrades of D90. And there are 5 and 3 below the 7 series. So it is easy to understand that D90 is more expensive than D3XXX.

Example: Just like a brand-new BMW 7 Series in 2009, it will never be cheaper than the BMW 3 Series in 12.

However, personally, there is no need to buy D90. Electronic products are updated too fast, and the first generation imaging is very different. The D90 is only more suitable for traditional and old users in operation layout. Moreover, seeing the landlord is just beginning to take pictures, so I have no habit. D90 used D5 100 second to spell CMOS process and imaging, not to mention the new machine now.

For example, the D90 is an old 7-series, with solid working comfort, but the engine and gearbox are old and the power is not good. D5 100 is similar to the newer 5 Series, with a new engine and gearbox, but the layout and IDRIVER interface are updated. You haven't used IDRIVER yourself, so it doesn't affect your use at all.

The following is my own opinion:

I majored in photography in college, and I majored in film and television myself. Usually, I also take photos or make microfilms by SLR.

A. The budget reaches 9000 (parallel imports) or 1 1000 (licensed products).

B. Have photography needs (such as opening a Taobao shop and determined to play photography).

I think it is basically a tragedy for any friend who buys a SLR if he can't meet the above two points at the same time.

The reason is simple:

There are two main reasons for buying a SLR: A is interested in image quality, and B is vain. Either way, sufficient funds are needed.

Not all SLR images are good. Image quality needs a good body+a good lens.

Because the SLR itself is very bulky, it has always sacrificed portability for image quality.

If the budget is insufficient and there is no money to buy a good lens body, then it may cost 5,000 yuan to buy a bad image quality.

A heavy iron pimple wants to buy 5000 yuan, it is better to buy a dumbbell to exercise at home!

Nowadays, more and more people buy SLR, but it is very responsible to say that 95% can't even do basic operations. Many times I can't even take a normal photo, let alone look good or not. So not everyone is suitable for SLR! Unless you insist on playing this! Relaxation is for playing, but actually for learning!

So my suggestion is:

If the landlord reaches the above budget, it is suggested to consider Nikon D7 100+ 16-85 or Canon 70D+ 15-85.

If the landlord cannot meet the above two conditions, it is recommended to go to Sony NEX or Fuji X 100, X 100S. Imaging is absolutely no less than SLR, because CMOS is as big as SLR. Light weight, compact and powerful imaging.

If the landlord just doesn't have enough budget and wants to get a SLR, it is suggested that the parallel product D7000+/KOOC-0/8-/KOOC-0/05 (Nikon/KOOC-0/8-/KOOC-0/05 is the lowest acceptable lens). It will be done around 6000.

It is not recommended to go any lower.

PS: Don't buy an entry-level Canon. Don't buy Nikon Canon 18-55.

The numbers 18-55, 18- 135 refer to the focal length range of this lens. From wide angle to telephoto. Note: the larger the range, the more convenient it is, but the worse the picture quality! The better the lens, the wider the range! 18-55, 18- 135, 18-200 is the garbage dog!