Why should Beijing be the most unforgettable place for Liang Sicheng's centenary birthday?

Liang Sicheng would be a hundred years old if he were alive. It is not me who should remember him most, but.

A city-Beijing, but Beijing disappeared and only stayed in a dream. With the passing of the old capital, let a

He is personally heartbroken, but there is nothing he can do. Do you remember this man in Beijing today?

Beijing is not Liang Sicheng's hometown, but when Beijing disappeared, he was most heartbroken. Did he?

I shed tears, I don't know, but I vaguely heard his sigh, Beijing, are you really here?

Did the sample disappear?

In order to keep Beijing and a classic city, Liang Sicheng paid a lifetime price.

He could have stopped talking and let the old capital leave him; You can also go far away and leave your old capital here.

Dream, but he really can't worry, he loves this city too much. History is really heartless, so be it.

When everyone was about to fall down, she wanted to carry her, but she was a thin and disabled scholar. male

Where did you get the courage? Culture? Art? Or something. He is the son of Liang Qichao,

China intellectuals have the most precious things in their veins. It is said that in order to save Beijing, Liang Sicheng

I quarreled with Beijing Mayor Peng Zhen, but as a scholar, what's the use of quarreling? Beijing is still

disappear

Many years later, I saw Liang Sicheng talking with some professors in Shenyang at 1957.

This is a report about Liang Sicheng's guilt. On that occasion, Liang Sicheng and Hu Yuzhi went to Shenyang together.

Yang, it is the time when a hundred schools of thought contend, and all the senior intellectuals in Shenyang dare not speak.

Liang Sicheng encouraged them and told them about his argument with Peng Zhen.

Liang Sicheng said, "I know Peng Zhen very well and have been arguing about the construction of Beijing.

I said that if you don't adopt it now, fifty years later, the facts will prove me right. Peng Zhen said that if you.

The emperor must be a tyrant. Now it seems that some of my views are wrong, but

I dare argue. One can't have no opinion. Liang Sicheng also told reporters: "I

This formalistic retro hat has been worn for several years, and now it seems to be mine.

This view is not completely wrong. "Peng Zhen is very interesting. He described Liang Sicheng as a tyrant.

Perhaps Liang Sicheng was too stubborn to give up his opinion and stimulated him. Peng Zhen's hometown is in the mountains.

Xihouma, this is the place that Liang Sicheng yearns for most. At that time, in order to survey the ancient buildings in China,

Liang Sicheng and Lin almost traveled all over Shanxi, and it is conceivable that Liang Sicheng measured Yingxian wooden pagoda.

Look, they were surprised to find the northern lay in Wutai Mountain. Liang Sicheng never thought that he would be like this.

The biggest surprise in life comes from Shanxi, and his biggest disappointment also comes from Shanxi. Is this an accident?

Fate?

1957 Like many intellectuals, the naive Liang Sicheng thought he was an intellectual.

The "early spring weather" is coming, and he wants to catch his breath in this "spring" because he has been holding it for too long.

Yes During the ideological reform movement, Liang Sicheng wrote a famous article "Who do I serve?

Twenty years have passed, and there are still several such articles in Liang Sicheng's life, but we can't read them from there.

The heart of an intellectual. Perhaps there is no lack of sincerity, but if Liang Sicheng of 1952 is true,

Honestly, what about Liang Sicheng in 1957? Liang Sicheng said: "For more than 20 years, on the one hand,

Going to the periphery of the reactionary ruling clique has become a tool driven by them; On the other hand, I

The "cultural people" who were close to the US imperialist invasion of China were wooed by the enemy and served them.

Active policy service. "At that time, intellectuals said many puzzling things in order to pass the customs.

Liang Sicheng is not so easy to self-destruct, but at that time, a scholar was ok.

What's a better choice?

1955 The criticism of Liang Sicheng's architectural thought did not destroy his inner world.

At that time, a basic evaluation of Tsinghua University Architecture Department was: "Professor of Tsinghua University Architecture Department."

There is a bourgeois formalism architectural thought, represented by Liang Sicheng.

Most teachers headed by them unilaterally emphasize that "architecture is art" or regard architecture as "the first"

Works of art, and then engineering construction. " In the process of professional teaching, there is a unique

Aestheticism emphasizes that the difference between Tsinghua architecture department and other architecture departments lies in education.

Students master "art" and mistakenly think that the level of industrial architecture is low, so they should learn civil architecture well.

It will be an industrial building with low artistic requirements. Some teachers even think that cultivating industrial buildings.

Designing cadres is not the task of the Department of Architecture in Tsinghua University, but in the teaching process of the Department of Architecture in Tsinghua University.

Spreading retro and formalistic architectural ideas runs through the whole teaching process.

Hold the view that "Qing is not as good as Ming, Ming is not as good as Liao, and Liao is not as good as Tang".

This was for Liang Sicheng, and then he began to criticize his architectural thought. At the same time,

Beijing began its fate of disappearing. Liang Sicheng was silent, but his heart was not calm. male

Have too deep feelings for the city, watching her disappear, but can't stop him and Peng Zhen.

There was a quarrel, but the scholar met a soldier. Liang Sicheng is near Shanxi and Shanxi is far from Liang Sicheng.

remote ...

1952 Liang Sicheng compromised, 1955 he remained silent, but 1957 remained the same.

A Liang was holding on, but he was going to talk. He said it in Shenyang and he will say it again in Beijing.

1957 On March 2nd, at the 24th meeting of Beijing Municipal People's Committee, Liang Sicheng faced north.

Beijing Urban Construction expressed its views.

Liang Sicheng said: "When West Chang 'an Avenue was widened, many houses were demolished, and the streets crossed as a result.

Wide, not in the middle of the street, reserved for parking lots, demolished houses for parking lots. I don't think so.

Suitable. "He also said:" West Chang 'an Avenue is too wide, and sprinters have to run for eleven seconds, so it's average.

It takes more than a minute to walk alone, and it is even more difficult for an old lady with little feet to cross this street. "About the Twin Towers

Demolition of Qingshou Temple.

Liang Sicheng said: "In the widening project of West Chang 'an Avenue, we were not careful enough and demolished Qingshou Temple.

At that time, there was an argument, and the relevant parties tore it down without careful consideration. I think it should be kept for half a year

One year, when the masses say it's not good, it's not too late to tear it down. "About the demolition of Dongzhimen Tower.

Liang Sicheng said: "I heard that the relevant parties will tear down the Dongzhimen Tower when building roads. I think.

Think about it, this tower is the only nanmu building left over from the Ming Dynasty in Beijing. 1934

When lyna was the mayor of Beijing in, a Japanese carpenter saw an old nanmu building.

Willing to subsidize 20 thousand yuan for maintenance. People shouldn't treat these ancient things as antiques,

They play a decorative role in the city. Many cities abroad are very particular about clothes on the road.

Decoration doesn't seem monotonous. We should pay attention to this problem. Of course, we don't have to spend money on construction.

Some buildings should make good use of it to serve the city. "Liang Sicheng spoke his mind, but

He didn't keep the twin towers, Qingshou Temple and Dongzhimen Tower, but they disappeared. Shuangta Qingshou Temple

First of all, Qingshou Temple was built to commemorate Haiyun, a monk in the early Ming Dynasty, and his disciple Kean.

These two men played a great role in Mongolia's war of aggression against China and were traitors. Second, because these two

This tower is a building of A Qing dynasty, and it has no value. Dongzhimen Tower was demolished for Dongjiao Airport.

After completion, the transportation is convenient. If the tower is not demolished, it will cost tens of thousands of yuan to rebuild the road.

All this sounds reasonable, but you can't think it over.

The thinking of Beijing urban construction decision-makers is: everything is based on in the name of people. Liang Sicheng wants to protect.

Leaving ancient buildings, they say those things are inconvenient for people's lives; It is said that Liang Sicheng needs Lin.

Yin Hui talks to the rickshaw pullers and asks them to tell them how these buildings hinder traffic. Said it was to keep the past.

Buildings need money. It was also strange that the country didn't have so much financial resources at that time. How to keep it better?

What is the construction cost? Besides, how many people were there in the fifties for the convenience of airport transportation?

People fly every day? It seems unreasonable that policy makers are short-sighted and uneducated, Liang

Architects who travel around the world like this think West Chang 'an Avenue is too wide and just entered the city.

Do cadres think about future development? Who rode by car every day in the fifties? People, people

People ... I remembered madame roland's famous saying: freedom, freedom, how many people pretend to be your name? ...

If a person is wrongly approved, hundreds of millions of people will be born. This is what Ma Yinchu said.

Wrong batch of one person, less famous city, this is what Liang Sicheng said.