The hotel was spied on.

The restaurant is not responsible for employees' off-duty behavior during duty.

However, as the manager of the hotel, the restaurant is a security obligor and has the obligation to protect the property safety of guests. Restaurants have failed to fulfill their reasonable obligations to protect the personal and property safety of guests, and need to bear supplementary responsibilities for voyeurs.

Whether the person in charge has the responsibility depends on how to determine whether the restaurant has fulfilled its reasonable security obligations. In this case, the hotel, as an employer, has the obligation to educate and supervise its employees, so it should bear the responsibility.