The family members who died in diving in the hot spring pool sued the hotel. Why did everyone support the hotel together?

This is a story about a man in Guangzhou demonstrating diving in a 60 cm deep hot spring pool. Results The head was injured and he died after being rescued. His family angrily took the hotel to court. As a result, not only the court ruled that the hotel was not responsible, but also many netizens supported the hotel. What's going on here?

1. A man in Guangzhou died unfortunately for demonstrating diving to his children. 20 18, staying in hot spring hotel with friends Zhao, Zhang, Li and their children. At that time, there was a hot spring pool 3 meters long, 2 meters wide and 0.6 meters deep in the hotel room, so several people took a hot spring bath together.

After soaking in the hot spring, several people sat by the pool to have a rest and chat. Wei told Li's children to dive first when diving. In order to prove his statement is correct, Wei directly prepared a live diving demonstration.

Several friends of Wei advised against the demonstration. As a result, Wei didn't listen at all. He felt that he could not lose face in front of the children and insisted on giving them a demonstration, so Wei jumped into the pool from the hot spring pool.

When Wei jumped down, his ass hit the wall when he squatted down, and he fell into the hot spring without standing firm, resulting in head injury. Although he was rescued afterwards, Wei died because the rescue was invalid.

Second, parents took the hotel to court. As a result, the court ruled that the hotel was not responsible and netizens also supported the hotel. Wei's family naturally quit, thinking that the hotel didn't play a guarantee role, and the design of the hotel's walls and hot springs was unreasonable, which caused Wei to fall into the water and even took the hotel to court and asked Wei to give a statement.

After a lapse of two years, the court held that Wei jumped to his death in the hot spring pool, the hotel was not at fault, and the hotel had fulfilled its security obligations, so the hotel was completely irresponsible.

Not only did the court rule that the hotel was not responsible, but many netizens also supported the hotel and thought that the hotel was not responsible. What is this? In fact, it is clear in the hotel room? Please don't frolic in the swimming pool. Signboard, which means that the hotel has actually given a warning. Wei insisted on diving himself, and the hotel was not responsible.

It can be seen that the hotel has fulfilled the responsibility of reminding to a certain extent, and relevant signs have been set up in the room. It was Wei's insistence on demonstrating diving for his children that caused the accident, and the hotel was not responsible. After all, it is impossible for the hotel to send someone to follow customers and remind them at any time.