US 9 1 1 Event Details

9 1 1 announces the arrival of a new era, and reveals that under the background of economic globalization and terrorism globalization, a huge crisis has emerged in the whole world. 9 1 1 The occurrence of an event is a fixed number, and no one can change it from the moment it happens. So what caused the 9 1 1 event? Why is this happening? This is the cause and process of the fate of the 9 1 1 incident, which is nothing more than the bane of American foreign policy and the result of the growing power of international terrorism (please read the relevant materials for this analysis). From the 9 1 1 incident, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were drawn. This is how things have formed one fate after another, so the formation of any fate is very complicated. But there is a clear conclusion: once something happens, it is a foregone conclusion and cannot be changed. Sometimes even if it doesn't happen, the ending already exists. This is true of world events, and personal events are no exception. A business or a relationship, when it begins to happen, the ending is already determined. In addition, from the social structure, the United States is too loose, the average person has no sense of belonging, and the whole society is cold and scary. Therefore, people with bad brains (and thousands of old people and weak people in Qian Qian) are not cared for and managed. They won't make any "big events", but they will be as cold as ice soon. Sociology can provide complete information about the 9 1 1 event. Now we will use two opposing schools of sociology-structural functionalism and conflict theory-to deeply reflect on the 9 1 1 incident. According to the conflict theory, it is completely normal for individuals, groups, classes, nations and even countries to have conflicts and contradictions. These conflicts are caused by conflicts between different interests or stakeholders. Therefore, as long as there are different stakeholders in the world, conflicts are inevitable. Moreover, conflict theorists believe that conflict has its social function and is a positive driving force to promote social progress. Although structural functionalists do not advocate conflict and regard it as a "bad thing", they believe that the view that conflict breaks the system equilibrium is not negative. They believe that conflict provides tension and system power for system rebalancing, which will promote the system to reach a higher level of balance. The international community is a large interdependent system. The appearance of 9 1 1 has broken the balance of this system, and the international community really needs a new system integration. But why should a new international order be established? Whose new international order is to be established? Is it cooperation to develop a multipolar world, or is unilateralism immune to it? The international community is far from reaching a consensus on all these issues.