Classification of artistic photography

The problem with the definition of photography is that in this dichotomy, "process" is not the highest thing, that is, it is not something that can exist independently. In the logical division of traditional ontology, the highest category is "existence/existence", which is a general theory created by Plato after inheriting the "existence/existence" ontology of Elias School. When taking "existence/existence" as a kind, the biggest drawback is to establish "existence/existence" as a self-evident thing and be understood by us. When criticizing Plato's General Theory of Species, Aristotle correctly pointed out that "being/being" cannot be regarded as a relationship. If "being/being" is a relationship, then there will be no difference between things, that is, things will always be the same and monolithic (metaphysics). Although he was aware of the defects of traditional logic, he didn't stick to it and study it deeply. So in the definition of man, Aristotle turned to this logic and gave a deductive conclusion that "man is an animal of society", such as "species (animals)+genus (society)". Guided by this, the concept of "being/being" as a species has always been the axis of western thought. Only recently, when Kierkegaard's lonely soul faced God and caused the anxiety of existence (human existence), did it stimulate the emergence of a new ontology that "existence/existence" is not a relationship, and the new ontology first lifted the relationship between "existence/existence". This situation is the interrelation of the world composed of the earth, the sky, God and self, and it is a temporary way of existence. In this sense, the logic and language of art and science. Obtained their own independent scope, and beauty is displayed as the presentation of the existing situation, no matter what the definition of beauty is. At this point, the significance of Bresson's later saying that "the photo is shooting me" lies in this, and the postmodernist Valdrial's "the object is tempting me to shoot" is also interlinked with Bresson in the new ontological sense. Inspired by this new ontology, art (including photography) spontaneously gives up the utility of expression and external certainty to describe objects, and shows the infinite possibility of existence in situations. Heraclitus, a former Elijah, said that "the sun is new every day" is not true for rational logic, but it has become a real existence for artists. Therefore, when the basis of the traditional rational logic classification method, that is, the relationship of "being/being", is shaken, how can the art presented in the existing situation be included in the container of rational sharing? Even if we can't do it, the result will be: with such a simple division, the infinite presentation of photography or art (both of which have the participation of the mind and can express their understanding of their own existence) will become poor. As a counterexample, it can be shown that pure recorded data photography classified from "photography is a process" is considered to be the least artistic. If we use Kandinsky's "dislocation dash" method, we can also bring us "situational presentation" through ironic rhetoric. The desire to classify photography is actually influenced by metaphysical impulse, and we have some arbitrary understanding of photography. It is this special ideology that can hardly give us a credible result. In the criticism of rational logic, as early as Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, the traditional existential logic was meaningfully examined, which opened a gap in the depths of the whole rational logic. It was Kant who brought the rational logic of flying in a vacuum back to the real practice and re-criticized "social animals" (Kant's practical anthropology).