Insect flower and bird photography video daquan

Let's go to Panasonic. I'm tired of hearing those comments. I think Panasonic single battery is good, the lens quality is good, and there is Leica certification. The lens is good, the light transmittance is high, and efficient photosensitive elements can be used. The quality and details of the film are much better than those of Shenma card machine. This idea is very rational. I don't want to buy a SLR either. Haha, you can see Panasonic's machines by yourself, whether it's telephoto machine or micro-single, the scores are quite high. I'll give you one with a low price and a big budget, right? Panasonic fz40, remember, you go to Zhongguancun to see a sample of this machine. Yes, it takes skill to take photos like that, but it also shows that if you can take photos, you will definitely not arrange them. Effect! Just look at Panasonic GF3. Personally, other people's comments are well-founded, but the products are different and the eyes are different. It feels good to see the proofs by yourself. It's that simple. I can't compare with Leica's flagship SLR. There is no comparability and no need for comparison. With these two recommendations, I think it's good to give points. The birds and fur of these two models are clearly photographed, with feelings and transparency. I feel very encouraged! ? The G 12 you mentioned is of SLR descent, but it is ok and the effect is good, but I still believe in the quality of the lens in macro and flowers, birds, fish and insects. After all, everyone's skills are similar, right? ! The quality of the lens will affect the film effect.