What lens does the children's documentary use?

What camera does a child photographer use?

Let me put it this way:

If it is commercial children's photography, it needs to take care of children's eyes, so it needs high-sensitivity photography to operate in a dark environment, and the post-processing space also needs pixels. Therefore, full-frame cameras such as d6 10, 6d and 5d3 with excellent high sensitivity are better.

If it is for home use, children are active. In order to capture a more vivid picture, focusing and continuous shooting are more important. D7 100, d300s, 70d and 7d are recommended, and Sony's single battery series can also be considered. Continuous shooting is good, but the focus is average.

If family records are needed, it is recommended to have a portable micro-camera with a certain image quality, which is very convenient to carry around. If there is no requirement, an ordinary card machine can also be used, depending on personal preference. Brand comprehensive consideration: Sony Canon

If personal economic conditions permit, at present, considering the popularity of high-definition digital in the future, I will buy a professional digital portable computer from Sony of Japan. This professional machine is generally between 40,000 and 50,000. Because the adhesive tape is no longer used, it is cost-saving in the long run, but the one-time investment is relatively large. The relationship between digital camera and tape camera is similar to the familiar traditional film camera and the current digital camera. One advantage of digital camera is that the output of data is very convenient, and it can be directly sent to the computer for offline editing. (Of course, there must be corresponding editing software)

If the conditions are poor, you can also buy Panasonic machines or Sony's 198P, Z5C and other tape cameras. There are many more professional models, and the price is about 20,000 to 30,000.

Canon also has a variety of digital cameras, but personally, the quality of its digital cameras is superior, and in the camera field, there is still a distance compared with Sony and Panasonic, but the price is not cheap.

Is it better to shoot a documentary with DV or micro-single?

First of all, we must understand the difference between the two.

The principle of photography or camera shooting is that light enters a CCD or CMOS graphic sensor through a lens, and the optical signal is converted into an electrical signal and stored in a memory card. Then the factors that affect the image quality are the lens and graphics sensor. Obviously, SLR is far superior to DV in these two aspects, and its image quality is only close to that of card DC, because the lens is relatively low-grade and the image sensor is very small, which restricts the improvement of its image quality. SLR can easily capture the texture of Hollywood blockbusters.

It is precisely because of the good image quality-more pixel information is recorded, so the video file size shot by SLR per minute is much larger than that of DV with the same format, so there is much more room for post-processing, editing, compression and other operations.

Of course, the disadvantage of shooting video with SLR is not designed for video shooting, so the speed of automatic zoom focusing is not as fast as DV, which has been greatly improved on Sony's single camera and high-end Quan Huafu SLR.

In fact, you can also compromise and shoot with Sony micro-single, just to learn from each other.

Photographer, what equipment is suitable for making a documentary?

This mainly depends on the budget. The budget is enough. Alai, red, generally c300, BMD, fs7. If it is not good, it can only be 5D and GH5S. This film is a comprehensive display. Topic selection, script, lighting, photography, radio, broadcasting, editing, music, packaging and color correction all need to be excellent in order to produce a good work, not a good camera.