Ask for card machine recommendation

Look at my brother's question. It's quite professional. Your position should be around 1000-2500.

Let's start with the models you mentioned above. The quality of cameras is no problem for several major brands. But the imaging quality is definitely different, which has little to do with the brand, but the model is different. Every brand is its own flagship machine, which is the real strength. Just like fighting troops on the battlefield. Of course, there are also artistic and propaganda forces for show. Never buy these machines. Such as Sony TX 100? Canon A3300. Pixels up to 1600. But the imaging effect is a mess. The price of TX 100 is as high as 2400. The internet blew badly, but I tried it and found it was rubbish. I'm sorry for going too far.

Casio's machine positioning is moderate, mainly fool machine. I think the three Z2300 models you mentioned can be considered. Although the price is low, but not all fools, there are some manual functions. At this price, only Z2300 should have manual function. It's amazing.

The benefits of manual operation are really too great. It's useless for a fool to configure it no matter how well, because he can't make full use of resources. ZR 10？ H30

They are all stupid machines, and the price is not low. Although they have many functions, they are not worth it. Canon 3 10 is an upgraded version of the 300, but it adds a wide angle and then becomes a touch screen, but it costs 500 yuan, which is not worth it. 300 is very good, with some manual functions, the price is less than 2000. 2.0 large aperture, Canon's latest HS system, the most popular back-illuminated CMOS. The imaging is very good. Then don't worry about 220, the price is not much different, but it's just an idiot machine. Actually, what I really want to recommend to you is Nikon P300. It's Nikon's current flagship machine. With panoramic scanning function, it is very easy to use and intelligent. The speed is very fast, and the panoramic scanning of some machines is very complicated. Panoramic scanning of Nikon and Sony machines is better. Then 1.8 large aperture, full manual function, IXUS300 is only partially manual. The imaging is very sharp and can be compared with Canon S95, but the price is much lower. This photography network abroad is greatly appreciated. I have seen a lot of photos taken by them, and they are all very good. There are not many domestic samples, because they are all very new models. You can go to www.flickr.com in the United States. Nbsp Look at P300 photos on the website. Especially the night scene really has the quality of a SLR camera.

The following one is what I found on it. For your reference, you can usually find other cameras. There will be many classic camera samples. The camera still has to speak with facts. It is useless for us to analyze the data only by feeling. Looking at photos taken by others is the most convincing. Ha ha.