The budget is 1W5. Do you want D300S or D7000?

I bought D7000 in June. . I thought the same as you ~! Hesitated for a long time between D7000 D300S 7D. . Finally, I chose D7000. Tell me my opinion. I hope it helps you.

The first reason why I chose D7000 is that I mainly shoot scenery, so D7000 and D300S are neck and neck in the imaging rough surface, and the high sense is similar. . All available sensitivities of 1600 are over. . So, it doesn't matter if you say imaging. Of course, 7K has more pixels than 1600 W, and the advantage of post-cropping is greater (post-cropping is very helpful to adjust the photo composition. For example, your hook doesn't have enough telephoto, which can be solved by cutting. D300S has only 1200 W pixels, so it has no advantage. ) The second reason why I chose 7K is that its operability is moderate. There are not only the operation options of entry-level SLR, but also many function buttons of professional SLR, which is very helpful for me. D300S is basically the operation button and process of a professional camera, so its body and buttons are more professional (in short, the buttons are slightly larger than 7K and feel brighter). For the fuselage, the top and back of 7K are made of magnesium and aluminum, while the D300S is made of all magnesium and aluminum. This is the problem of durability, waterproof and dustproof, but if you are at home, these two machines can be competent even in the field. Well, the stand-alone price is about 7800, and the D300S price difference is about 8800, which is about 1000 yuan ~ (but I didn't have much rice in my hand when I bought it, so I tend to be cheaper. ) Another reason why I chose 7K is to try to match better lenses. After all, the quality of this photo mainly depends on the lens. So I later matched the lens of 16-85. The reason is that I used to have a Nikon D3000, 18- 105. Well, although the focal length of 105 is more convenient, the imaging is very general (18- 105 is quite cost-effective, as long as 1600 yuan), so I plan to have a better tour this time. Nikon's tourist head is nothing more than18-10518-200 16-85, of which 16-85 is the best imaging, and16-85 is the workmanship. 16-85 is around 4600, and18-200 is around 5800. I chose 16-85 because I took a fancy to its imaging and wide-angle end, and I plan to get a telephoto end in the future, so I bought a zoom section, which is too large and repetitive, and the imaging is not guaranteed (it is best to have a wide-angle end and a telephoto end with the black 70-200 hey and 16-85 focal lengths I started last week).

So the price of D7000 plus 16-85 is around 12500. If your budget can be increased by 2000, you can still buy 70-300 Nikon with your current money. The imaging price is still right, and the price of anti-shake ED lens is around 3800. With some packages, the price of UV lens is about 1W7. If you don't want to accompany telephoto for the time being, 16-85 is actually enough. Multiplying the focal length by 1.5 is also good, which is one or two thousand yuan less than your budget. Hey, so in fact, 7K of 16-85 is a good choice. As for the continuous shooting number, although there is a gap of 1, it is no problem to photograph your own children. Don't worry, it's useless for me to shoot birds with 7K, mainly depending on the brightness of the light at that time. Even if the brightness is low, it's useless to be afraid of a fast number.

But! ! I want to say, but 7K has a small drawback! ! I wonder if this malady can change your choice tendency.

The photosensitive element of D7000 is damaged, at least this batch is defective so far. Like the K-5 introduced by Pentax last year, it is to narrow the aperture, such as F 16 F22. When you shoot a scene with a solid background, there will be sputtering black spots in the image, which are very small and you can't see clearly without zooming in. The photosensitive elements of D7000 and K-5 are provided by Sony, and both have the same problem. This kind of small black spots can only be seen when the aperture is small, and although it is said that you can go to Nikon for after-sales cleaning, it will still be there soon. These little black spots are disgusting if you have a high demand for image quality when shooting small aperture scenes, and there may be more than a dozen of them. I didn't know until I read a post on Wuji after I bought it. As a result, I looked at the photos I took. My camera has five black spots under the aperture of F22. . What can you see when you shoot a solid color scene, such as the sky?

Yes Well, if you don't think this little problem is important, you can consider the 7K option of 16-85. If you have a big problem, suggest D300S or even D300. After all, an S is a high-definition video, and other functions are the same. But even if you start with D300S of 16-85, its budget is still in surplus.

I hope it helps you to type so many words. After all, spending so much money on a SLR means buying a satisfactory one. . . Finally, I wish you a favorite camera, hahaha.

(/kloc-more than 0/500 words ~ you are the most typed answer. Haha, mainly to see a guy who is as confused as me. I'm afraid you'll regret buying 7K in the end. )