Comparative evaluation of mobile phone photos

Take photos of tourists, take photos while walking, take portraits and visit museums.

Scene 1: Photos of tourists visiting here.

Since the color is adjustable, we won't discuss this. Only from the central image quality, the camera is more delicate, and the words on the plaque are clearer after enlargement. Although the sharpening of the mobile phone is not good, the actual clarity is not enough, and the actual look and feel is not as good as that of the camera without sharpening.

Scene 2: Take photos while walking.

Go out for a walk and shoot the reeds by the lake, zoom in to 100%. There is little difference in the size of the scene in the original picture, and the color is not discussed. It can be seen that the difference between a mobile phone and a camera is very obvious, one is weeds and the other is scenery.

Scene 3: Portrait shooting.

Personally, I think portrait shooting is the biggest difference between a mobile phone and a camera. Similarly, regardless of the color, the scene taken by the camera is still in low light environment. If it's a portrait at night, the mobile phone photographer probably doesn't want to take it in continuous shooting.

Scene 4: Museum.

In the low light environment, mobile phone manufacturers advertise more and publicize more. From the actual shooting experience, there is a huge gap between the low light environment and the camera, and the color loss of the mobile phone is serious. Here, color is not a problem to discuss, but it is completely unnecessary to discuss it. Moreover, in fact, films taken in the low light environment of mobile phones, especially portraits, are basically short people choosing tall people, and they can only be compared horizontally in mobile phones to see who is stronger. Especially in low light environment, all cameras are hand-held.