Is there a big difference between Twilight movies and books?

A movie can't cover everything in the book in two hours, so if you like electronic photography, I suggest you read this book, too.

The dialogue in the book is much more classic and rich than that in the movie. It should be said that the film only shows a few impressive scenes in the book, but as a film, it is attractive enough. Personally, I don't think books and movies can be described as different in content. First, the film is based on the original, which can only be said to be an enlargement of several shots in the book. Secondly, this book is the most popular novel after Harry Potter, and it was made into a movie only after the original became famous. So it's classic enough to read the original.