Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - How to treat human travel to the South Pole?

How to treat human travel to the South Pole?

Answer angrily! How did the subject come to the conclusion that "more and more people travel to Antarctica, then the only pure land will be destroyed"? This conclusion? Does the subject know how many people go to the South Pole every year? How many people have you met who have been to the South Pole? What did they do in Antarctica? What did you do to destroy the only pure land? 1. How many people are going to the South Pole? 2013-2014,37405 people; 2012-2013,34354 people; 20 1 1-20 12 years, 26,509 people; Seeing this, people may say, look, the number of people in Antarctica is soaring year by year, right? It's crucial, right? Don't worry, look down at 2010-201year, 33,824 people; From 2009 to 20 10/0,36,875 people; In 2008-2009, 37,858 people; In fact, 20 13-20 14 is not as crowded as in 2008-2009! You might think that the number of people under 3W is roughly stable between 33000 and -3.8W every year except for those under 3W who are 20112. Wrong again! Look again: in 2007-2008, there were 46,069 people! Di Mei alone went to 1.65W people! 36%! In 2006-2007, 37,552 people; (Note: IAATO's statistics is a cross-annual statistical method of 20 13-20 14-let's just understand it as the year of travel. Because the Antarctic can only last from 165438+ 10 to March of the following year. Does not affect the logical integrity of the annual statistical data. ) In other words, from the data of the past eight years, the number of tourists in Antarctica is about 3.5W, and the absolute number of tourists in Antarctica is still very small. After all, not everyone has the opportunity to go to the South Pole, and the travel expenses here are really high. At present, there are only 48 authorized merchant ships, except for small boats, there are about 24 merchant ships that can really travel. With so many ships, it is unlikely that the number of people will surge in the short term. Of course, the possibility of future increase is not ruled out. At least the data of the past eight years show that it is impossible to draw the conclusion that more and more people are traveling to Antarctica! Second, look at the second question. What do tourists do in Antarctica? 1. See the glacier by speedboat: 2. Climb: 3. Watch penguins and shoot seals. 4. skiing. 5. Canoeing to see whales. 6. Cruise by assault boat. 7. Camping (some cruise ships provide this service) that's all! How can an individual travel to the South Pole except for trips to the South Pole? There are ways to introduce Antarctic travel), more than 95% of the trips are regular Antarctic Peninsula cruises, that's all. Which of the above activities may destroy this pure continent? I don't deny that some tourists' environmental awareness is not good enough, but on the whole, most tourists' environmental awareness is still very good. Antarctica, another special place, IAATO has strict requirements for all companies that have the right to travel in Antarctica. It can even be said that Antarctic travel is the place with the highest requirements for environmental protection in the world. None! If so, please tell us. Due to the effective work of the organization, it can be said that the overall environmental quality of Antarctic tourists is far higher than that of other tourist destinations. This is just like the probability of littering cigarette butts in the lobby of a five-star hotel is lower than that of street food stalls-this place is too clean, and the overall performance of tourists in this place is too good, even tourists with less environmental awareness will unconsciously protect it. Excerpts from several instructions for Antarctic expedition formulated by the International Association of Antarctic Travel Agencies: The protection of Antarctic wildlife must comply with the regulations of the competent state departments, and it is forbidden to harm or interfere with Antarctic wildlife. It is forbidden to use aircraft, ships or related vehicles to interfere with all kinds of creatures on land, in the air or in the sea. Don't feed, touch, approach or photograph birds and seals, and change their ecological behavior, especially when they are hatching eggs or molting. Don't damage plants, for example, don't walk, drive or land on moss-covered land or slopes. Don't use firearms or explosives, try to reduce noise and avoid scaring the ecological work and rest of wild animals. Cats, dogs, flowers, plants and other animals and plants can't be brought to the South Pole. There are dogs pulling sledges in the North Pole, so you must not bring any animals and plants in the South Pole! I wonder which tourist destination in the world has such strict regulations. Besides, tourists can't even take a stone away! The staff on the Antarctic cruise ship will really supervise when landing! It is true that tourists will interfere if they bend down to pick up stones. In addition to leaving footprints in the snow, the biggest influence of tourists on the original scenery of Antarctica is probably to pick up an ice floe that has been in the sea for tens of thousands of years to match whiskey-this is allowed. As the only pure place in the world and one of the few destinations in the world where we can see the primitive earth, why not witness the end of the world with our restrained, rational and protective travel? As a member of the earth's creatures, why not visit the South Pole in this way? Why not praise the beauty of the creator with awe? Regardless of the objective facts, all acts based on subjective malicious speculation are hooligans! Finally, tell a true story: while the Antarctic tourist was sitting on the ground to rest, a penguin came over and fell asleep on her lap! Yes, sleep! Look! Yes! According to the travel guide, tourists can't take the initiative to contact animals, and are even required to keep a distance of 5 meters from penguins. However, they are like this! More! Yes! Visitors can't touch it. The tourist sat for more than 20 minutes. When the penguin woke up and left, the tourists stood up! That's what tourists do in Antarctica! To sum up, I personally don't think that human travel to Antarctica will destroy this only pure land! If you are interested and have the financial resources to travel to the South Pole, it is not bad to appreciate the original land left by the creator to mankind! All right, just sauce purple! Description of interests: employees in the tourism industry. Wechat platform: xzy-trip does not affect personal conclusions. Disclaimer: Refuse to reprint without permission! ! ! Show all