Is photography often reprinted an infringement?

Whether reprinting photography infringement is infringement depends on the situation. If it is for personal learning, appreciation and other reasonable purposes, and indicate the name of the author and the name of the work, it is not infringement; If you use other people's photographic works for profit, it is infringement.

legal ground

Article 5 of the Copyright Law of People's Republic of China (PRC)

This law does not apply to:

(1) Laws, regulations, resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs and other documents of a legislative, administrative and judicial nature and their official translations;

(2) current affairs news;

(3) calendars, general digital tables, general tables and formulas.

Article 22

Under the following circumstances, a work may be used without permission or payment to the copyright owner, but the name of the author and the name of the work shall be indicated, and other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner in accordance with this Law shall not be infringed:

(a) for personal study, research or appreciation of the use of other people's published works;

(2) appropriately quoting published works of others in works for the purpose of introducing and commenting on works or explaining problems;

(3) inevitably copying and quoting published works in newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations and other media in order to report current news;

(6) Translating or reproducing a few published works for classroom teaching or scientific research in schools for use by teaching or scientific researchers, but not publishing them; Wait a minute.