Poor but three generations, SLR poor but three generations. Believe that sentence

SLR is poor for three generations, and photography destroys life ... This is a mockery of investing heavily in photography. In fact, as long as you invest wisely and don't spend money blindly, you won't spend too much money on photography.

Just playing online games for three generations, playing dota will ruin your life; Now it is estimated that playing lol can ruin your life. Playing games has no future.

If you are poor for three generations, you will be rich for three generations.

Because there were many children in ancient times, for example, the second generation of children divided property, and the third generation of children also divided property, so they were not rich after sharing. Poor but three generations should be the second generation. A poor wife can't marry. Without a wife, there would be no children. No children, no offspring. Therefore, when the ancients said this, they encouraged people to get rich by hook or by crook and get poor honestly ... The world is full of temptations, and people who play SLR are easily tempted to save face, and only for the so-called "professional equipment" will they fall into the strange circle of "poor photography, three generations of SLR destroyed". After playing SLR for 25 years, I have only played entry-level cameras. It is most important to keep a normal mind. I won't change the camera because it doesn't have a body motor or shoulder screen. In fact, no matter what I play with my camera or anything else, the reason is the same. Choosing what you like best, what suits you best and the one with the highest utilization rate is the king of consumption. After all, cameras are for use. Is it reasonable or unreasonable to say that "three generations are poor and three generations are rich"? If you put it online, I'm afraid many people will be flushed and unable to get a high level; Because, in the face of subjective knowledge or objective facts, we can cite many examples to prove the right or wrong of this sentence. ...

Hello, old people always say that the quality of a daughter-in-law directly affects a good daughter-in-law of a family and will make the family more prosperous. And a bad wife will affect three generations.