Is it better to learn photography and buy Sony micro-orders or Nikon or Canon SLR?

Hello, I do wedding photography. I take pictures with Nikon Z6. I don't know much about photography, but I know many photographers. I can tell you what the equipment used by my peers is in a more grounded way.

Before 20 17 a few years ago, almost all cameras were Canon 6D 5D3 5D4, and some were Canon 5D2. No one takes pictures with Nikon, but there are many Nikon cameras, and Sony is still developing micro-sheets.

From about 20 17, slowly, photographers began to switch between Sony's camera body and Canon lens, and gradually the market was occupied by Sony, but no one shot with Nikon.

Until last year, Canon and Nikon launched Canon R and Nikon Z series respectively, and began to enter the micro-single market. However, Sony developed early, so the micro-cameras are basically Sony's, and there are photographers in Canon. Nikon Z6 has never seen it, but Nikon Z6 focuses on video, so now Nikon is still doing very well in shooting video, which can be compared with Canon Sony. But when it comes to taking pictures, I don't recommend buying Sony's. Sony's lenses are really expensive, and the cost performance is not very high. If I mainly take photos and occasionally shoot videos, I still recommend buying Canon or Nikon, which has the highest cost performance, and Canon's lens is very good, so I suggest buying Nikon Z6 or Canon R, and wish the landlord good work.

Sony, Nikon and Canon are the three giants in the field of digital cameras. On the SLR, Nikon and Canon are neck and neck to suppress Sony. On the micro-list, Sony outshines Nikon Canon. When it comes to performance differences, the three are equal in the same level, and there are some tendencies in design at most, but no one has an overwhelming advantage.