Recommend a digital camera.

Canon: Canon is in the first group in the field of traditional cameras and digital cameras. Its product line is very rich and complete, including mini IXUS series, household A series, quasi-professional G series and professional EOS digital SLR. Each series has the best-selling backbone products. Canon products often have comprehensive functions, acceptable image quality and obvious shortcomings.

Nikon: Nikon and Canon have been playing from traditional cameras to digital cameras. Some people joked that "Canon lives forever, Nikon lives forever", but Nikon's advantages and disadvantages are still quite obvious. Nikon's DC is often the best and sharpest of its kind, and its macro is quite strong, but its battery life is short, its operation is cumbersome and its response is slow.

Fuji: A group of cameras shoot the same scenery. The color of Fuji DC is often the brightest and very eye-catching. Fuji seems to have never produced DC with rotating LCD or rotating lens, which seems to be due to cost considerations.

Olympus: Contrary to Fuji, the colors of Olympus are often the simplest. Almost all of them are underground places like Fuji, and they generally need to be saturated later. However, the white balance of Olympus has always been the most reassuring. Olympus has done a good job in quasi-professional DC. The picture, function, speed and battery are all above average, and there are no obvious shortcomings. However, in terms of mini fashion DC, Olympus's reputation is not very good, and it can't be compared with Canon and Minolta. As for the μ-mini series that has attracted much attention recently, if it is put together with Canon IXUS30/40, it will be seen that it is not a mini at all.

Konica Minolta: Konica, Minolta and Konica Minolta seem to be three different brands in the market, but they are closely related ... I don't know, so I put them together ... Minolta is called "technical madman", and its products are often versatile, technologically advanced, and the price is often the most expensive among the same pixel products, but they are also worth the money.

Sony: Although Sony doesn't come from optical products like previous manufacturers, the DC quality is still good, but I don't know why it is often mixed. Fashion machines, home machines and quasi-professional machines are available. Sony's products often have a strong Japanese flavor-rich functions (the functions of F7 17 are rarely matched by consumers' DC nowadays), pleasing appearance (but P series and W series don't feel like Sony), and the reliability is just enough in non-professional fields (I mean, it can't be compared with German manufacturers such as Leica). Sony has always used its own memory stick (except F828 has dual interfaces of CF and memory stick), which is an obstacle for players who pay attention to cost performance.

Panasonic: Like Sony, it is also a "saint", so its characteristics are very similar. In addition, like Sony, it is also looking for German lens brands to cooperate and put a little "professional" gold on its DC (although these lenses are not original). Due to its limited strength, Panasonic did not have a direct conflict with previous manufacturers, so it concentrated on telephoto and mini models. In telephoto, Panasonic's FZ series has a high market share, and in mini-machine, Panasonic has added anti-shake function in an ingenious way, which has won a good market response.

Casio, Ricoh and Pentax: Due to their limited strength, these three manufacturers basically only make mini models. Casio is committed to making cameras smaller and thinner, while Ricoh is characterized by wide angle and quick response.

Kodak: Now it's the turn of non-Japanese manufacturers-many people don't buy Japanese goods, but they can only stare at Kodak Samsung, but to be honest, their strength still lags behind Canon Nikon and so on ... Kodak's digital SLR is quite high-end, but the consumption of DC is average, and the color is often good, but the details and sharpness are really not good, and there are few designs such as rotating LCD, so the price is often attractive.

Samsung: Samsung almost only makes home computers, and the latest fashion machines are actually not very small, at least not as good as Canon and Casio. The picture quality is quite satisfactory. I've seen the films made by my classmates with Samsung V4, and the colors and details are better than I expected.

Hewlett-Packard: The details are very general, the appearance is not attractive, and I don't know much about it.

Lycra: Lycra also has its own digital camera, but the price is too high to consider. ...

BenQ: I heard that there are also models of rotating LCD in BenQ, and my heart is warm. Then I found that this LCD can only be turned sideways and almost fainted ... You know, vertical inversion is the most used, and horizontal inversion LCD has no other use except self-timer. As for the general situation of BenQ DC ... I don't think there is anything wrong with it because of its price. As a toy, I should still be capable.

1. The most successful brand in market operation: Canon.

Although technology is the primary productive force, in the world of consumer electronics, the primary productive force cannot be completely transformed into the primary competitiveness. Look at this tech freak.

Immersed in technology, Ke Mei and Pentax know the current situation. Canon's style of introducing machines is: from high-end to low-end, each DC is built by itself.

The price system is closely linked, and they are not very keen on the introduction of new technologies. It can even be said that if it is not in terms of cost and sex,

If there is a good balance with market performance, we will not blindly introduce new technologies and new molds. Since the birth of a series, machines have promoted

In dozens of versions, it follows the following upgrades:

A80-A95-A6 10-A630

A620 A640

A70-A75-A85-A5 10-A530

A520 A540

A400-A4 10-A430

Look at the genealogy above. Except for the pixel upgrade, the CCD and lens remain unchanged (except that A85 is upgraded to A5 10, because it turns out that A85 can't play the role of a low-end mobile phone well), and the cost is well controlled.

Invincible in war. Moreover, there are few mistakes in the development process, and most models are classic machines. There are very few similar Sony.

A mistake.

Moderation and steadiness are the consistent styles of Canon, which makes it the most mature and successful brand.

2。 The most controversial brand: Samsung

What I like is fashionable and cost-effective.

Those who destroy it are regarded as heretics, rubbish and ignorant of photography.

No matter how controversial it is, Samsung's step-by-step progress is obvious, although up to now, its image quality is still unsatisfactory.

However, how many people who pursue fashion really care about image quality? Just shoot it. Look how beautiful this machine is!

Although its success in DC consumption is obvious, I am not optimistic about Samsung's SLR. I used Pentax's two.

Is the adopted son a member of the family? Besides, Pentax didn't ask for it? Pentax has abandoned ISTD series and used K series instead.

3。 The most embarrassing brand: Nikon

I want to rise, but Sony has my testicles. Every time I want to go crazy in the market, I am often Yang Wei, the most professional brand in the eyes of photographers.

CCD is not his own. Quan Huafu has been crying for many years and has not been seen, making Canon's rabbit a lonely dancer.

A few years ago, its high-end consumer machines were all very good, coolpix5400, 8400, 8700, 8800, 5700, with powerful functions.

Supplementary admiration. However, several romantic figures have died, and the current consumption DC is L and P, and the S series dominates the world, from the top P series to the bottom.

The price of SLR D50 is reduced by several thousand yuan! Its whole product system can't be connected at all, which is sad ~ ~ ~

I know that many people have Nikon complex, so do I, so I am more worried about its present situation. D80 is out, can this noble hold down A 100?

And 400D? I think it's dead.

4。 The most retrogressive brands: Kodak and Olympus

Kodak and Olympus are tied for this honor, and the vagaries of DC rivers and lakes make people feel that nature is deceiving.

Before 2004, Olympus played an important role in the DC market, and it has always been a place to explore flowers.

Speaking of telephoto, everyone must say C7××

When it comes to fashion, we must talk about miu series.

Speaking of high-end, C8080 was the leader of high-end machines that year.

Many people around me have chosen the O machine.

Unfortunately, after a series of tricks, Olympus walked into the abyss step by step. Although you have made frequent efforts since last year and the pushing speed is quite fast, how many models can you remember?

It now has a wide front, from SLR to low-end machine, attacking all the way and losing many battles. Let's bless it.

The brand that continues to regress the most

Kodak, the reason why I want to put it in the back is to give it a hat: the most disappointing brand.

In today's market, Samsung and Kodak also bear the aura of non-Japanese goods, but the treatment they receive is quite different. Many people regard Samsung as melatonin, which is different from treating Samsung like "the autumn wind sweeps away the leaves", but Kodak enjoys the "spring-like warmth", which is simply loved by thousands of people. Although we "Zhao Yun" strongly supported us, Kodak has been vomiting blood towards the goal of "A Dou".

Kodak has come this far, I think there are several reasons:

A: The historical burden is too heavy, and I attach too much importance to movies, so I have been hesitant to develop DC, although it is a pioneer of DC; It pays too much attention to photo printing. It seems to pay more attention to the photo printing business that customers cooperate with Kodak DC, which leads to the special image quality of Kodak DC. The traces of processing in Kodak DC machine are too obvious, the image quality is controversial, and the advantages of ps are lost, but the developed effect is absolutely brilliant. But how many photos did you develop for the DC you bought? I think more people choose to put it on the computer.

B. There is something wrong with the market operation: Kodak is certainly not slow in pushing new machines, but what is worse is that its own machines are slowly withdrawing from the market. Take the classic telephoto DC as an example. Due to the great success of 6490, Kodak intends to dig more gold in this field. The prices of Z7590, Z740, Z6 12 and P850 are constantly coming out, with four generations under one roof and overlapping prices.

Problems in brand operation, coupled with the recent chilling LS443 incident, Kodak has broken the hearts of consumers. Zhao Yun, will this sinus be guaranteed?

5。 The most personalized brand: Fuji

Nowadays, there are various styles of consumers DC, but they have a similar heart. After all, there are only a few CCD manufacturers. Fuji, on the other hand, has taken a different approach, using its own super CCD, people engage in anti-shake, it engages in high ISO, people engage in high pixels, and it engages in large CCD, all of which deviate from the trend but can succeed repeatedly. Just like Liu Bei bragged to others: Be prepared to act normally, and every time you confront Cao Cao, things can turn into gossip. With the success of F series, Fuji became the leader of the second group. It pays great attention to family planning, unlike Kodak, which has few styles in each series, but it can be used in its own way. However, judging from the handling of F 10, F 1 1 and F30, it is still not as excellent as Canon, and it turns out that the introduction of V 10 is a big stink.

In the field of SLR, Fuji is not so fierce. It adopts "hermit crab tactics" and builds its own nest with Nikon's shell, which is neither too slow nor too dead. However, with its characteristics in portrait, Xiaoao Studio is ok.

6。 The lowest-key brand: Pentax

For it, I really want to shed a hero's tears. The technology is so excellent and the market performance is so poor. For DC consumption, we say that Sony is doing very well, Canon has excellent image quality, and Pentax is excellent in everything (excluding OEM). Look at the shake-head telephoto machine IOPT-X, 750 ... Needless to say, large and medium format, 135 format SLR, can be used by consumer machines. Unfortunately, in the promising SLR market, there are a bunch of inexplicable istD series with obscure names and average indicators (the picture quality is definitely not average! ), coupled with the scarcity of lens resources and poor market operation, made most parts of the country surrender. However, since the adoption of two SLR cameras to Samsung, Pentax seems to know everything, and now it seems to be slowly finding a feeling. The consumption from SLR K 100 to DC A 10 is remarkable. Unfortunately, there is not much time and space left for it. ...

7。 The brand with the strongest comprehensive strength: Sony

Before the merger of Ke Mei, Sony was already a mobile phone consumer of dc. When I first came into contact with dc, people around me said that Sony was the most professional in DC ... (Laughter) Although it was very popular in the market, Sony still lacked confidence. Although F7 17 was a great success, F828 was called Zibian King. Although it has mastered the manufacturing process of CCD, although it has been consumed, it plays SLR, hehe, your Sony is still young ~ ~ ~

However, after accepting Ke Mei, Sony suddenly became strong. It not only has mastered the core ccd technology, but also has skillful market operation (watching it play T series is just like Canon playing A series). Just like Cao Cao, who unified the north, he is full of ambition, grasping SLR in one hand and DC in the other, and both hands want to be hard. A 100 is comrade Cao Cao's gauntlet: "whoever is near gives up the crime of cutting, and Liu Cong gives up. Today, there are 800 people in the water conservancy army, and Fang and others will hunt in Wu ... ",but what is the record of A 100, the pioneer of the water conservancy army? Let's keep our eyes open and watch.

Ok, the ranking list ends here, but as a conclusion, I list two pairs of brands that are very predestined.

The first pair: Panasonic and Casio

To say that a few years ago, Panasonic was nothing, but it started with telephoto and anti-shake (it was not the first to introduce anti-shake, but it was the best to play anti-shake, and now it seems that it is shameful for DC not to shake it). Now it is actually a vassal, telephoto, wide angle, card, home, SLR, attacking everywhere, very nourishing; Moreover, after cooperating with Lycra, they actually pulled the tiger skin and sold it at a high price, but the consumers were surprisingly tolerant. Do you find it strange?

In any case, its road is getting wider and wider-"Our life is full of sunshine"

To say that Casio was also famous for a while a few years ago, rotating the lens to zoom. It is very interesting, at least one of the pioneers of DC market. It's a pity that it's Spring Festival in Wang Xiaoer, and it's getting worse every year. It was awesome in those days, including professional machines, telephoto machines and home computers. Which one can't live without it? But since the high-end P series, our "Guan Yu" has gone to "Maicheng", and now only the card machine is left. At the beginning, many professional card machine manufacturers were dismissive (such as our "Adou" Kodak and Nikon). Now everyone wants to squeeze in here, which is very dangerous.

Casio's road is getting narrower and narrower now-"Please don't hurt me again"

The second pair: Sanyo and Sigma

Sanyo only plays consumer dc, and Sima only plays SLR.

Sanyo is mainly OEM, and amateurs introduce razors by the way. It doesn't matter if you don't play well, the loss is not big anyway.

Sima focused on the camera. In order to match the lens, you can play SLR by the way. It doesn't matter if it doesn't sell well. Anyway, what you want is the effect of this music.