Which one is better, Tamron 90mm2.8 Macro or Tokina Micro?

I use Tamron, which is an old lens and its reputation among macro lenses is well-known. I am also very satisfied with its performance, and its usage rate is greater than that of Nikon's original AF60mm macro. I have seen the lens in the picture. The workmanship and feel are very good, and the materials used are also very solid. I have seen reviews of it on "Friends of Photography", and the reviews are very high. The image quality is said to be better than the Tamron lens. But I found that its popularity rate is far less than that of Tamron. Many netizens know little about it. It is a neglected lens.

A friend bought Tokina last year and I tested it. The optical quality is indeed very good, but it doesn't feel much better than my Tamron, certainly not worse. However, its lens is more beautiful than Tamron's, and its workmanship is better, and its feel is much better than Tamron's. At first glance, it looks like an original Nikon lens.