16-85 or 18-200, which lens is more practical? Note: If you plan to buy a head in your life.

It must be 16-85. There is nothing to say. This head is actually not cost-effective, but ... buy 18-200 is ok. After buying it, everyone can congratulate you. Your mid-range SLR has officially upgraded its telephoto machine.

The lens of 18-200 is suitable for users who have no requirements or care about the image quality. The purpose of using SLR is to shine. This lens is not as good as the telescope head at the end of 18- 105. The level exceeding 105 is close to telephoto, and there is no advantage except long focal length. A single lens can buy two telephoto lenses with good performance (or 35 times zoom), plus the fuselage. Congratulations, the most expensive telephoto machine in history was born.

Actually, your starting point is practicality. 16-85 is equivalent to the focal length of 24- 127, which is the most commonly used focal length. It has both super wide angle and telephoto, and can adapt to almost 90% occasions, unless you like to shoot birds, the moon or peep.