Questions about Sony Zeiss 16-80 lens.

1, as a zoom lens, the quality is good. Wide angle to medium telephoto. First of all, the theme can cover the needs of daily life. The good thing is the resolution, which is compared with other grades of APS frame zoom lenses. Simply put, it is clearer. But if you want sharper background blur and better shooting ability in low light, 16-80 won't bring any improvement. If you want these effects, you can consider the latest DT 16-50/2.8 released by Sony.

2. If you used 18-55, and now you change it to 16-80, theoretically, your photo quality will be better than before. But if you want to take a good photo, besides the performance of the camera and the quality of the lens, you also need the photographer's personal skills (such as lighting and composition) and inspiration, or the soul you give to the photo (content wins). The performance of 60D is better than that of α450, but it has little effect on image quality. On the other hand, compared with 18- 135 of the same grade, the picture quality is still a little worse. Canon and Zeiss 16-80 are comparable to EF-S 15-85. The main reason is the resolution difference of the lens, that is, 16-80 and 15-85 are clearer than 18-55, 18- 135 and 18-200. So the conclusion is that the 60D picture quality of the combination of 18- 135 is not as good as the α450 of 16-80, but the α450 of DT 17-50/2.8 should be the best.

Welcome questions.