If the SLR camera and lens are poor, you might as well buy the best card camera, right?

No, the overall imaging level of a SLR is still much higher (the area of ??the photosensitive element is several to dozens of times that of a general camera). Even if it is a secondary factory lens, you can produce good pictures as long as you use a reasonable aperture (avoiding the maximum and minimum aperture) and reasonable settings. Ordinary cards are really incomparable. That is to say, quasi-professional-grade portable cameras that cost three or four thousand like Canon G12 and Panasonic LX5 can be compared slightly. However, it is inconvenient if the lens equipped is an 18-55 type lens. The large zoom lens of the card will still be more convenient.

Shiyixi District Photography’s answer really makes people don’t know what to say! Let’s not talk about whether we know it or not. I have been in this industry for some years. Don’t talk about whether you are a master or not, and don’t bring up anyone else’s issues. Here I and the person above are just analyzing the difference in objective card and SLR performance. Leica machines are more expensive than ordinary SLRs, but if you give them to a fool, they still won’t be able to take pictures. Therefore, under the premise of certain personnel skills, equipment will of course play a decisive factor. If I increase your D3X by three yuan and let you and Mr. Li Yuan go out to collect the cards and come back to participate in the competition, I'm afraid you may not win the prize, right?

I am here to answer questions only to help the poster solve problems and solve problems, not to quarrel with others.

Photography in Shiyixi District, please think about it slowly...