The difference between photography and portrait structure

First of all, the difference between painting and photography, camera composition.

Painting is a work of art and a collection. Paintings of various materials pursue longer preservation time, because they are ornaments with collection significance. Therefore, composition pays more attention to the integrity of the picture, which is a long-term visual consumption. Whether it is scenery, people or other subjects, the integrity of composition can be said to be the biggest difference from photography. Especially for portraits, the position of the subject of any master's portrait in the picture is properly arranged, and the golden section, the proportional relationship between the map and the ground (portrait and background), the distance from the subject to the edge of the picture, and the tangent shape will all be taken into account. In this kind of works, it is rare to divide the subject by the edge of the picture. Even if it is a bust, the division will avoid the head, joints and other positions, and will not spend too much energy on the main part of the edge of the picture.

And photography does not need to be taboo. In today's photography, photographers pay more attention to visual impact. If some compositions can bring more visual impact, even a picture with half a head cut off is effective. This kind of picture that does not pay attention to the integrity of composition is especially common in news and sports photography. This is a fast-food visual consumption, and it is also suitable for the present situation of visual aesthetic fatigue in modern society.

The difference between photography and camera composition, some people talk about the difference between audio-visual and static, and this is a defect in personal understanding. Others ask about composition, whether TV pictures match sounds, and what is the image of the silent film era?

Any picture has the function of visual communication (the deviation between communication and interpretation is not mentioned here). Painting and photography require that each painting can convey independent content. Therefore, in a limited picture, we have to consider the relationship between composition and content, even if it is a group of photos or a series of paintings. Photography can't require it to convey a content in every frame ... no matter whether the image is coherent in time and logic, or how different the camera's position, focal length and depth of field are. It is conveyed through a series of images. Therefore, it is not emphasized whether the composition of a minor clip is comfortable, and the communication mode of the camera also gives it a broader way of expression and composition.

At the same time, the development of modern photography, photography and painting art can make your question meaningless. Because there is no difference between painting and photography in composition, modern art has also begun to take the road of fast food. It's just that the means of communication are different, and no one will think about the difference in composition. On the contrary, it is limiting itself.