Which brand of consumer-grade SLR camera has higher cost performance and better shooting effect?

I play Nikon100 and D200, and I can't bear to sell the idle canon30D.

Anyone who really plays photography knows that 80% of the decisive factors in photographic imaging come from the lens. Hehe, mine is Nikon AF-S 24-70 mm f/2.8ED, one Nikon AF 24-85 mm f/2.8-4IF and one 80-200 F/2.8. Generally, three sheets are used. To tell the truth, I often use D 100, which is better than D200. What brand of machine to buy depends on which side you like. The machine depreciates quickly and the lens appreciates.

In fact, the backs of machines within 10,000 yuan are almost the same, and they are all plastic. Canon's advantages are that there are many lens choices, which are relatively cheap (except the red circle head) and the shutter response is fast; Nikon has bright colors, and the high-end fuselage is not as high as Canon's. Nikkor lens's low-end, mid-range and high-end lenses are better than Canon's lenses of the same level. In the past two years, Nicole has a product that can compete with Canon's high-end. Personally, I think Canon is better.

Nikon's entry-level fuselage is still very weak, basically belonging to SLR toys. The entry-level Canon low-end SLR at the same price is far better than Nikon's low-end SLR. 450D is a more mature Canon entry SLR back, far better than the original 300D and 350D. Go ahead, you can get a set of headphones (the market value is actually around 300 yuan) and play for a while. If you have money, you can change it to Canon EF 28- 135mm f/3.5-5.6, which is enough for your hobby of photography. Don't buy a head like Longteng. SLR is very professional. Longteng and Sigma are not without good brains, but they are generally strongly rejected by professional photography, so they are helpless. I bought a nice Li Tou when I was playing with the film machine, and I was despised for a long time.

Finally, encourage you to Canon, Canon. Why is Canon's fuselage outstanding? One is that Canon's electronic component is Niu B, and EOS5 in the film era was the most powerful automatic professional camera at that time. Secondly, canon's DiGIC chip is the core of canon 1Ds MarkII. With it, 1Ds MarkII can take 12 photos per second and store them instantly. It is amazing that each photo can reach 20-50 megabytes or more in TIFF or RAW format, and this volume will not be less than 40,000 so far.

(I originally replied to others, but it also applies to you, so I posted it! )

The people downstairs are very interesting, you know? Really understand? Old ideas from the' 80 s! Now the awesome enterprises are still1before the 1920s! Why does Nikon make its own CCD for optics? Only experts can keep an edge in this field. Ri 1, Qi 1, Fi 1, DS-2MBWc, ds-2mbv, DS-2MBW, these are the CCD numbers commonly used by Nikon. Ask Sony, hasn't the transfer to Nikon improved? There are three CCD companies in Japan, Canon, Fuji and Sony. Why does Nikon, who makes optics, have to do it by itself? Needless to say, Nikon, have you ever played Leica SLR R series cameras? Leica, Schneider and carl zeiss are the three most powerful optical companies in the world. Leica M series cameras are made in Germany, and Leica SLR R series cameras are all made in Japan, because they are digital! Top class is the top class and the most professional. Hasselblad in Sweden, Lulai and Leica in Germany, the most powerful camera manufacturers in the world, all make their own CCD, let alone CCD, and don't even produce their own digital backs. Why do digital back manufacturers like Fuji, Kodak and Freescale do it themselves? Lens and mechanical technology are the specialties of these camera manufacturers! You don't know how to pretend to know, and you fucking attack others. Sony also admires Canon, which is ridiculous. It is his electronic components that make Canon equal to Nikon in the film age. Canon takes the sports photography route. At that time, the lens and fuselage can't compete with Nikon (Nikon mainly takes still photography). CMOS was originally developed from the early optical compensation sensor. If you want to play with cameras, you should know that Canon gave priority to the shutter of electronic cameras in the early days, and the batteries were all made by yourself. You appreciate it more, don't you? Nonsense, there is nothing like his battery. In order to promote the motion shutter priority camera, he didn't build it himself. Who will build it for him? Nikon M2 is also the only camera that can reach the deepest part of the polar region today. Give back Sony A200, called Alpha, not A, but Greek! It's all fucking broken You are so learned! Can you ask Sony to build its own SLR? Why can't he make CCD? Yelling at me again? Don't say goodbye, I only know what I know but I don't know why. He doesn't cooperate with Minolta. Sony has only one CCD, and SLR needs sensors and mature and very powerful metering elements. This is not the basis of decades of optical cameras, and it is impossible to build them. In Japan, there are four metering mode elements, the most powerful Nikon's 256-zone 3D matrix metering, Minolta's 40-zone cellular metering, and Olympus's digital ESP metering. As for Canon's evaluation photometry and them, the number Alpha Greece is Konica Minolta's SLR camera number, and Sony borrowed it, and it's a fucking A! You are so talented!

It's a lie to give it back to us. I don't think you even know how this machine is constructed. It is also used for motor and dust removal. Have you ever used a digital camera that really removes dust? If you want to use it, you must know that it is useless. "It's expensive in Bisogni. Whoever buys it is stupid. " To tell the truth, you are too naive. You bought a SLR just to buy a CCD? Does CCD have more important performance than lens for SLR imaging quality? Then I'll tell you that most of sonyCCD are made in China, and according to our country's level, the lens of Nikon 10 years ago will not be made in another 50 years, let alone the new head of nano-layer, and Japan Optical Corporation will not be able to make the lens of Leica and Hasselblad in another 50 years. Like Swiss watches, they are all hand-ground, and Nikon is also hand-made. The most common Hasselblad is 30,000-40,000, and two-thirds of the price is on the lens. Nikon D3X and Canon 1Ds Mark III cost more than 40,000 yuan, with powerful image storage and processing capabilities, brand-new SLR sidelight system and all-metal mechanical precision parts. Not worth 1000 yuan for motor and COMS dust removal system. Besides, didn't you find that all of Nikon's more than 10 thousand dollars belong to COMS? What does this mean? CCD can't be restored in three colors, only COMS can. Do you admire Sony? At least use 10 different models of SLR in the future, and then use 120 to teach people a lesson! A little knowledge, not pretending to understand, is actually the most unfavorable to yourself!

In the camera era, Nikon and Canon cameras actually belong to Japanese 3-stream cameras and world 4-stream cameras. In Japan, Pentax is the top camera, followed by Fuji, Olympus and mamia. Minolta, Nikon, Canon, Ricoh, IELTS card, etc. It belongs to a third-rate camera. The first-class top cameras in the world are Leica, Lulai, Hasselblad and Contek (Carl Chase's own camera), except Hasselblad, which are all German cameras. Second-class cameras include Brownica, Schneider, Leica R series, Pentax, etc. The third-class cameras are Fuji and Olympus Mamiya in Japan, and the fourth-class cameras are Nikon and Canon.

Nikon started in nikkor lens, invested by Mitsubishi, and used Nikon lens in early Canon cameras. Nikon camera started from contax camera in Germany, is famous for AF camera, and is considered as the first-class in Japan in the later fuselage manufacturing. As the chief engineer of Nikon camera manufacturing, when he picked up Lycra M3, he described Japanese cameras as a mass of grass, and it was still unable to shorten the gap with German cameras even 10 years. German cameras mainly rely on advanced metal manufacturing technology, which are extremely complex and compact, with perfect seams, small size and durability. Furthermore, there is a nearly perfect lens manufacturing process. Leica camera is much smaller than Nikon camera, and its components are about 2/3 of Nikon camera's, but the complexity of functions and body buttons is far more than Nikon camera, or even twice as high. The manufacturing tolerance of Japanese cameras is three ten thousandths, while Leica is one ten thousandth. As far as waterproofing is concerned, Japanese cameras can be achieved by plastic edge sealing, while Lycra and Lulai can be achieved by minimizing the gap density of metal.

Tired! ! ! Sleep!